用于大型装配焊接顺序规划的计算工具开发

IF 0.5 4区 工程技术 Q4 ENGINEERING, MARINE
C. R. Fisher, Lori L. Denault, S. Rhodes, Jonathan T. Finley, Y. Gooroochurn
{"title":"用于大型装配焊接顺序规划的计算工具开发","authors":"C. R. Fisher, Lori L. Denault, S. Rhodes, Jonathan T. Finley, Y. Gooroochurn","doi":"10.5957/JSPD.11170054","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"For the U.S. Navy, the use of computational simulations is prevalent for structural finite-element analysis but not for shop floor fabrication during construction. However, prevention and mitigation of welding-induced deformation creates a significant manufacturing challenge during fabrication of major ship assemblies, especially for thin-plate steel construction. The objective of this project was to improve weld sequence planning (WSP) capabilities for major ship assemblies through the development of a quick and user-friendly WSP software tool. An approximately 5× reduction in analysis time (from model setup through solve time) was realized through process automation, development of a weld joint database, and two-step weld sequence optimization algorithms. Physical testing of tank-like structures validated the computational tool, which established high correlation between measured and predicted distortion results. Sequence optimization analysis for an eggcrate structure showed a 43% reduction in maximum distortion from the two-step optimization process within the WSP tool. The end goal of this program is improved confidence in, and use of, computational weld mechanics techniques to more cost-effectively serve the U.S. Navy enterprise.\n \n \n Within shipbuilding, the construction of major ship assemblies (e.g., foundation tanks, bulkheads, and deck plating) can result in significant welding-induced deformation, especially in thin-plate steel construction (Spraragen & Ettinger 1950). Prevention and mitigation of this distortion typically creates a significant manufacturing challenge to the fabrication shop floor in terms of impact to cost and schedule. In addition, the skilled trades do not typically have weld sequence and clamping plans for major structures, instead relying on trade knowledge (i.e., prior experience paired with trial and error) with limited documentation across successive (but corollary) builds.\n A more rigorous approach using computational weld mechanics (CWM) techniques would involve finite-element analysis (FEA) of the welded component. CWM techniques enable better documentation (possessing a digital component) and sequence optimization for distortion reduction. However, current FEA tools using a transient heat source model and an implicit solver require days, weeks, or even months to prepare the computational model, run the simulation, and analyze the results for major ship assemblies because of their size relative to the size of weld beads. This lengthy calculation time is not feasible for use in a shipyard environment. In addition, the users of the transient heat source FEA tools are typically highly trained, with PhD.-level experience in computational simulation, and are not typically found on the production floor of most shipyards.\n","PeriodicalId":48791,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Ship Production and Design","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2019-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Computational Tool Development for Weld Sequence Planning in Major Assemblies\",\"authors\":\"C. R. Fisher, Lori L. Denault, S. Rhodes, Jonathan T. Finley, Y. Gooroochurn\",\"doi\":\"10.5957/JSPD.11170054\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"For the U.S. Navy, the use of computational simulations is prevalent for structural finite-element analysis but not for shop floor fabrication during construction. However, prevention and mitigation of welding-induced deformation creates a significant manufacturing challenge during fabrication of major ship assemblies, especially for thin-plate steel construction. The objective of this project was to improve weld sequence planning (WSP) capabilities for major ship assemblies through the development of a quick and user-friendly WSP software tool. An approximately 5× reduction in analysis time (from model setup through solve time) was realized through process automation, development of a weld joint database, and two-step weld sequence optimization algorithms. Physical testing of tank-like structures validated the computational tool, which established high correlation between measured and predicted distortion results. Sequence optimization analysis for an eggcrate structure showed a 43% reduction in maximum distortion from the two-step optimization process within the WSP tool. The end goal of this program is improved confidence in, and use of, computational weld mechanics techniques to more cost-effectively serve the U.S. Navy enterprise.\\n \\n \\n Within shipbuilding, the construction of major ship assemblies (e.g., foundation tanks, bulkheads, and deck plating) can result in significant welding-induced deformation, especially in thin-plate steel construction (Spraragen & Ettinger 1950). Prevention and mitigation of this distortion typically creates a significant manufacturing challenge to the fabrication shop floor in terms of impact to cost and schedule. In addition, the skilled trades do not typically have weld sequence and clamping plans for major structures, instead relying on trade knowledge (i.e., prior experience paired with trial and error) with limited documentation across successive (but corollary) builds.\\n A more rigorous approach using computational weld mechanics (CWM) techniques would involve finite-element analysis (FEA) of the welded component. CWM techniques enable better documentation (possessing a digital component) and sequence optimization for distortion reduction. However, current FEA tools using a transient heat source model and an implicit solver require days, weeks, or even months to prepare the computational model, run the simulation, and analyze the results for major ship assemblies because of their size relative to the size of weld beads. This lengthy calculation time is not feasible for use in a shipyard environment. In addition, the users of the transient heat source FEA tools are typically highly trained, with PhD.-level experience in computational simulation, and are not typically found on the production floor of most shipyards.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":48791,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Ship Production and Design\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Ship Production and Design\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5957/JSPD.11170054\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, MARINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Ship Production and Design","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5957/JSPD.11170054","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MARINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

对于美国海军来说,计算模拟的使用普遍用于结构有限元分析,但不用于施工期间的车间制造。然而,预防和减轻焊接引起的变形在主要船舶组件的制造过程中造成了重大的制造挑战,特别是对于薄板钢结构。该项目的目标是通过开发快速且用户友好的WSP软件工具,提高主要船舶组件的焊接顺序规划(WSP)能力。通过过程自动化、开发焊缝数据库和两步焊接顺序优化算法,将分析时间(从模型建立到求解时间)减少了约5倍。罐式结构的物理测试验证了计算工具的有效性,该工具在测量和预测畸变结果之间建立了高度相关性。对一个卵箱结构的序列优化分析表明,在WSP工具内进行的两步优化过程中,最大畸变减少了43%。该项目的最终目标是提高对计算焊接力学技术的信心和使用,以更经济有效地为美国海军企业服务。在造船业中,主要船舶组件的建造(例如,基础水箱,舱壁和甲板电镀)可能导致严重的焊接引起的变形,特别是在薄板钢结构中(Spraragen & Ettinger 1950)。预防和减轻这种变形通常会对制造车间的成本和进度产生重大的制造挑战。此外,技术熟练的工人通常没有主要结构的焊接顺序和夹紧计划,而是依靠行业知识(即,之前的经验与试错相结合),在连续(但必然)的构建中提供有限的文档。使用计算焊接力学(CWM)技术的更严格的方法将涉及焊接部件的有限元分析(FEA)。CWM技术可以实现更好的文档(拥有数字组件)和序列优化,以减少失真。然而,目前使用瞬态热源模型和隐式求解器的有限元分析工具需要几天、几周甚至几个月的时间来准备计算模型、运行模拟,并分析主要船舶组件的结果,因为它们的尺寸相对于焊珠的尺寸。这种冗长的计算时间在船厂环境中是不可行的。此外,瞬态热源有限元分析工具的用户通常训练有素,具有博士学位。在计算模拟方面的水平经验,并且在大多数造船厂的生产车间中通常找不到。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Computational Tool Development for Weld Sequence Planning in Major Assemblies
For the U.S. Navy, the use of computational simulations is prevalent for structural finite-element analysis but not for shop floor fabrication during construction. However, prevention and mitigation of welding-induced deformation creates a significant manufacturing challenge during fabrication of major ship assemblies, especially for thin-plate steel construction. The objective of this project was to improve weld sequence planning (WSP) capabilities for major ship assemblies through the development of a quick and user-friendly WSP software tool. An approximately 5× reduction in analysis time (from model setup through solve time) was realized through process automation, development of a weld joint database, and two-step weld sequence optimization algorithms. Physical testing of tank-like structures validated the computational tool, which established high correlation between measured and predicted distortion results. Sequence optimization analysis for an eggcrate structure showed a 43% reduction in maximum distortion from the two-step optimization process within the WSP tool. The end goal of this program is improved confidence in, and use of, computational weld mechanics techniques to more cost-effectively serve the U.S. Navy enterprise. Within shipbuilding, the construction of major ship assemblies (e.g., foundation tanks, bulkheads, and deck plating) can result in significant welding-induced deformation, especially in thin-plate steel construction (Spraragen & Ettinger 1950). Prevention and mitigation of this distortion typically creates a significant manufacturing challenge to the fabrication shop floor in terms of impact to cost and schedule. In addition, the skilled trades do not typically have weld sequence and clamping plans for major structures, instead relying on trade knowledge (i.e., prior experience paired with trial and error) with limited documentation across successive (but corollary) builds. A more rigorous approach using computational weld mechanics (CWM) techniques would involve finite-element analysis (FEA) of the welded component. CWM techniques enable better documentation (possessing a digital component) and sequence optimization for distortion reduction. However, current FEA tools using a transient heat source model and an implicit solver require days, weeks, or even months to prepare the computational model, run the simulation, and analyze the results for major ship assemblies because of their size relative to the size of weld beads. This lengthy calculation time is not feasible for use in a shipyard environment. In addition, the users of the transient heat source FEA tools are typically highly trained, with PhD.-level experience in computational simulation, and are not typically found on the production floor of most shipyards.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
19
期刊介绍: Original and timely technical papers addressing problems of shipyard techniques and production of merchant and naval ships appear in this quarterly publication. Since its inception, the Journal of Ship Production and Design (formerly the Journal of Ship Production) has been a forum for peer-reviewed, professionally edited papers from academic and industry sources. As such it has influenced the worldwide development of ship production engineering as a fully qualified professional discipline. The expanded scope seeks papers in additional areas, specifically ship design, including design for production, plus other marine technology topics, such as ship operations, shipping economics, and safety. Each issue contains a well-rounded selection of technical papers relevant to marine professionals.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信