“它必须被保留”:阿道夫·博尔姆对勒科多尔的复兴

IF 0.2 3区 艺术学 0 MUSIC
Carolyn J. Watts
{"title":"“它必须被保留”:阿道夫·博尔姆对勒科多尔的复兴","authors":"Carolyn J. Watts","doi":"10.5406/19452349.39.4.05","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Upon the death of the impresario Serge Diaghilev in 1929, the Russian dancerchoreographer Adolph Bolm (1884–1951) penned a retrospective for an American publication, The Dance Magazine. Drawing from his tenure as premier danseur with the Ballets Russes from 1909 to 1917, he wrote of the late impresario’s character, accomplishments, and influence on the art world at large. The nowfamiliar tropes were rehearsed: Diaghilev was an autocratic “genius of the theater,” whose persistence and unfailing taste reinvigorated ballet in the West; Diaghilev mobilized Europe’s leading artistic figures for ballet, revolutionizing music and the scenic arts along the way; Diaghilev shone the spotlight on the male dancer and fostered the careers of the era’s leading Russian choreographers. Bolm ended his tribute with a simple, but imperative, appeal to his readers: “Diaghileff left a great legacy to the world of art, and it must be preserved.”1 How does one preserve a legacy? More crucially for Bolm, how does one preserve the legacy of a figure celebrated for his monumental impact on ballet, an artform notorious for its ephemerality? This question has long troubled dancemakers, old and new, from the fields of concert dance to folk dance.2 Diaghilev himself set up obstacles to these efforts by refusing to allow Ballets Russes productions to be filmed and failing to have the company’s choreographic works routinely notated. Nevertheless, the impresario’s trace remains in the vast array of musical scores, artworks, and photographs he commissioned during his career. The","PeriodicalId":43462,"journal":{"name":"AMERICAN MUSIC","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"\\\"It Must Be Preserved\\\": Adolph Bolm's Revival of Le Coq d'Or\",\"authors\":\"Carolyn J. Watts\",\"doi\":\"10.5406/19452349.39.4.05\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Upon the death of the impresario Serge Diaghilev in 1929, the Russian dancerchoreographer Adolph Bolm (1884–1951) penned a retrospective for an American publication, The Dance Magazine. Drawing from his tenure as premier danseur with the Ballets Russes from 1909 to 1917, he wrote of the late impresario’s character, accomplishments, and influence on the art world at large. The nowfamiliar tropes were rehearsed: Diaghilev was an autocratic “genius of the theater,” whose persistence and unfailing taste reinvigorated ballet in the West; Diaghilev mobilized Europe’s leading artistic figures for ballet, revolutionizing music and the scenic arts along the way; Diaghilev shone the spotlight on the male dancer and fostered the careers of the era’s leading Russian choreographers. Bolm ended his tribute with a simple, but imperative, appeal to his readers: “Diaghileff left a great legacy to the world of art, and it must be preserved.”1 How does one preserve a legacy? More crucially for Bolm, how does one preserve the legacy of a figure celebrated for his monumental impact on ballet, an artform notorious for its ephemerality? This question has long troubled dancemakers, old and new, from the fields of concert dance to folk dance.2 Diaghilev himself set up obstacles to these efforts by refusing to allow Ballets Russes productions to be filmed and failing to have the company’s choreographic works routinely notated. Nevertheless, the impresario’s trace remains in the vast array of musical scores, artworks, and photographs he commissioned during his career. The\",\"PeriodicalId\":43462,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"AMERICAN MUSIC\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"AMERICAN MUSIC\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5406/19452349.39.4.05\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"艺术学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"MUSIC\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AMERICAN MUSIC","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5406/19452349.39.4.05","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"艺术学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"MUSIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

1929年,经理人Serge Diaghilev去世后,俄罗斯舞蹈编舞家Adolph Bolm(1884–1951)为美国出版物《舞蹈杂志》撰写了一篇回顾展。他在1909年至1917年担任俄罗斯芭蕾舞团首席舞者期间,写下了这位已故经理人的性格、成就以及对整个艺术界的影响。现在熟悉的比喻被排练过:迪亚吉列夫是一位专制的“戏剧天才”,他的坚持和不懈的品味重振了西方芭蕾舞的活力;迪亚吉列夫动员了欧洲顶尖的芭蕾舞艺术人物,一路走来,音乐和风景艺术发生了革命性的变化;迪亚吉列夫将聚光灯对准了这位男舞者,并培养了当时俄罗斯顶尖编舞家的职业生涯。博尔姆在结束他的致敬时,向读者发出了一个简单但必要的呼吁:“迪亚吉列夫给艺术界留下了伟大的遗产,必须加以保护。”1如何保护遗产?对博姆来说,更重要的是,如何保护一个因其对芭蕾舞的巨大影响而闻名的人物的遗产,芭蕾舞是一种因其短暂性而臭名昭著的艺术形式?从音乐会舞蹈到民间舞蹈,这个问题一直困扰着新老舞蹈制作人。2迪亚吉列夫本人拒绝拍摄俄罗斯芭蕾舞团的作品,也没有对该公司的舞蹈作品进行常规注释,从而为这些努力设置了障碍。尽管如此,这位经理人的踪迹仍然存在于他职业生涯中委托制作的大量乐谱、艺术品和照片中。这个
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
"It Must Be Preserved": Adolph Bolm's Revival of Le Coq d'Or
Upon the death of the impresario Serge Diaghilev in 1929, the Russian dancerchoreographer Adolph Bolm (1884–1951) penned a retrospective for an American publication, The Dance Magazine. Drawing from his tenure as premier danseur with the Ballets Russes from 1909 to 1917, he wrote of the late impresario’s character, accomplishments, and influence on the art world at large. The nowfamiliar tropes were rehearsed: Diaghilev was an autocratic “genius of the theater,” whose persistence and unfailing taste reinvigorated ballet in the West; Diaghilev mobilized Europe’s leading artistic figures for ballet, revolutionizing music and the scenic arts along the way; Diaghilev shone the spotlight on the male dancer and fostered the careers of the era’s leading Russian choreographers. Bolm ended his tribute with a simple, but imperative, appeal to his readers: “Diaghileff left a great legacy to the world of art, and it must be preserved.”1 How does one preserve a legacy? More crucially for Bolm, how does one preserve the legacy of a figure celebrated for his monumental impact on ballet, an artform notorious for its ephemerality? This question has long troubled dancemakers, old and new, from the fields of concert dance to folk dance.2 Diaghilev himself set up obstacles to these efforts by refusing to allow Ballets Russes productions to be filmed and failing to have the company’s choreographic works routinely notated. Nevertheless, the impresario’s trace remains in the vast array of musical scores, artworks, and photographs he commissioned during his career. The
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
50.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Now in its 28th year, American Music publishes articles on American composers, performers, publishers, institutions, events, and the music industry, as well as book and recording reviews, bibliographies, and discographies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信