脉动气流注入气膜冷却的有效性(综述)

IF 0.9 Q4 ENERGY & FUELS
A. V. Shchukin, A. V. Il’inkov, V. V. Takmovtsev, I. A. Popov, A. L. Tukmakov, A. V. Starodumov
{"title":"脉动气流注入气膜冷却的有效性(综述)","authors":"A. V. Shchukin,&nbsp;A. V. Il’inkov,&nbsp;V. V. Takmovtsev,&nbsp;I. A. Popov,&nbsp;A. L. Tukmakov,&nbsp;A. V. Starodumov","doi":"10.1134/S0040601523090069","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>An analytical review is presented of scientific publications with the results of physical and numerical simulation of the effect of the pulsating cooling air flow on the effectiveness of thermal cooling η, specifically on the airfoil part of turbine blades. The tests carried out under nearly full-scale conditions have revealed positive, variable, or negative effects of pulsations on the effectiveness of the film cooling. It has been found that a positive or negative effect of pulsations superimposed on the injected air flow is determined by the transport mechanisms in the film-cooling system, which are observed without pulsations. At the same time, fan-shaped holes give a higher local effectiveness of the film cooling compared to classical cylindrical holes not only in the steady-state case without changing the coolant flowrate but also in the case with pulsating flow injection. In the steady-state case, this occurs at a blowing ratio of <i>m</i> = 1.0, and that with the pulsating flow injection is at <i>m</i> = 1.5 and 2.0. This is caused by the more uniform coverage by the gas-air mixture of the cooled surface downstream of the section with pulsating air flow injection. Moreover, at <i>m</i> = 1.5 for holes of both shapes, the pulsating coolant flow with <i>m</i> = 1.5 offers a higher spanwise averaged effectiveness of film cooling, <span>\\(\\bar {\\eta },\\)</span> than the injected steady flow does. The examined methods for predicting the effect of pulsating flow injection on <span>\\(\\eta \\)</span> require only knowledge of the steady flow behavior and enable us to assess when pulsing would be beneficial or detrimental for the effectiveness of film cooling.</p>","PeriodicalId":799,"journal":{"name":"Thermal Engineering","volume":"70 9","pages":"639 - 649"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Effectiveness of Film Cooling with Injection of Pulsating Air Flow (Review)\",\"authors\":\"A. V. Shchukin,&nbsp;A. V. Il’inkov,&nbsp;V. V. Takmovtsev,&nbsp;I. A. Popov,&nbsp;A. L. Tukmakov,&nbsp;A. V. Starodumov\",\"doi\":\"10.1134/S0040601523090069\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>An analytical review is presented of scientific publications with the results of physical and numerical simulation of the effect of the pulsating cooling air flow on the effectiveness of thermal cooling η, specifically on the airfoil part of turbine blades. The tests carried out under nearly full-scale conditions have revealed positive, variable, or negative effects of pulsations on the effectiveness of the film cooling. It has been found that a positive or negative effect of pulsations superimposed on the injected air flow is determined by the transport mechanisms in the film-cooling system, which are observed without pulsations. At the same time, fan-shaped holes give a higher local effectiveness of the film cooling compared to classical cylindrical holes not only in the steady-state case without changing the coolant flowrate but also in the case with pulsating flow injection. In the steady-state case, this occurs at a blowing ratio of <i>m</i> = 1.0, and that with the pulsating flow injection is at <i>m</i> = 1.5 and 2.0. This is caused by the more uniform coverage by the gas-air mixture of the cooled surface downstream of the section with pulsating air flow injection. Moreover, at <i>m</i> = 1.5 for holes of both shapes, the pulsating coolant flow with <i>m</i> = 1.5 offers a higher spanwise averaged effectiveness of film cooling, <span>\\\\(\\\\bar {\\\\eta },\\\\)</span> than the injected steady flow does. The examined methods for predicting the effect of pulsating flow injection on <span>\\\\(\\\\eta \\\\)</span> require only knowledge of the steady flow behavior and enable us to assess when pulsing would be beneficial or detrimental for the effectiveness of film cooling.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":799,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Thermal Engineering\",\"volume\":\"70 9\",\"pages\":\"639 - 649\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Thermal Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1134/S0040601523090069\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ENERGY & FUELS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Thermal Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1134/S0040601523090069","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文分析了脉动冷却气流对热冷却η效率的影响,特别是对涡轮叶片翼型部分进行了物理和数值模拟。在几乎全尺寸条件下进行的测试揭示了脉动对膜冷却有效性的积极、可变或消极影响。研究发现,在没有脉动的情况下,气膜冷却系统中的输运机制决定了叠加在注入气流上的脉动的积极或消极影响。与此同时,无论是在不改变冷却剂流量的稳态情况下,还是在脉动流喷射情况下,扇形孔都比经典圆柱孔具有更高的局部膜冷却效率。在稳态情况下,这种情况发生在吹气比m = 1.0时,而在脉动流动情况下,这种情况发生在m = 1.5和2.0时。这是由于使用脉动气流注入的截面下游冷却表面的气体-空气混合物覆盖更均匀。此外,对于两种形状的孔,在m = 1.5时,m = 1.5的脉动冷却剂流提供了更高的展向平均膜冷却效率,\(\bar {\eta },\)比注入的稳定流。预测脉动流动注射对\(\eta \)的影响所检验的方法只需要了解稳态流动行为,并使我们能够评估何时脉动对膜冷却的有效性有益或有害。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

The Effectiveness of Film Cooling with Injection of Pulsating Air Flow (Review)

The Effectiveness of Film Cooling with Injection of Pulsating Air Flow (Review)

An analytical review is presented of scientific publications with the results of physical and numerical simulation of the effect of the pulsating cooling air flow on the effectiveness of thermal cooling η, specifically on the airfoil part of turbine blades. The tests carried out under nearly full-scale conditions have revealed positive, variable, or negative effects of pulsations on the effectiveness of the film cooling. It has been found that a positive or negative effect of pulsations superimposed on the injected air flow is determined by the transport mechanisms in the film-cooling system, which are observed without pulsations. At the same time, fan-shaped holes give a higher local effectiveness of the film cooling compared to classical cylindrical holes not only in the steady-state case without changing the coolant flowrate but also in the case with pulsating flow injection. In the steady-state case, this occurs at a blowing ratio of m = 1.0, and that with the pulsating flow injection is at m = 1.5 and 2.0. This is caused by the more uniform coverage by the gas-air mixture of the cooled surface downstream of the section with pulsating air flow injection. Moreover, at m = 1.5 for holes of both shapes, the pulsating coolant flow with m = 1.5 offers a higher spanwise averaged effectiveness of film cooling, \(\bar {\eta },\) than the injected steady flow does. The examined methods for predicting the effect of pulsating flow injection on \(\eta \) require only knowledge of the steady flow behavior and enable us to assess when pulsing would be beneficial or detrimental for the effectiveness of film cooling.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
20.00%
发文量
94
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信