考察印尼的传单效应:城乡土地和建筑税向地方政府转移后的证据

Raden Muhammad Afrizal, Khoirunurrofik Khoirunurrofik
{"title":"考察印尼的传单效应:城乡土地和建筑税向地方政府转移后的证据","authors":"Raden Muhammad Afrizal, Khoirunurrofik Khoirunurrofik","doi":"10.21787/jbp.14.2022.465-478","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In order to increase the tax power of local governments, the central government implemented a major reform in 2010 by transferring the Urban-Country Land and Buildings Tax (PBB-P2) to local governments. Although the tax contributes a significant portion of local government revenues, the spending behavior of local governments is questionable, and it is unclear whether public spending has been increased. This study examines the effect of strengthening PBB-P2 policy on increasing local revenue (PAD) and its impact on regional spending patterns, specifically whether there are still flypapers after policy reform. Applying a fixed-effects panel data method to Indonesian local governments from 2005 to 2020, we found that strengthening PBB-P2 policy had a significant positive impact on PAD. The positive effect was found to be significant one year (year +1) after policy implementation in each region, including for the province, district, and city, with the issuance of regional ordinances related to PBB-P2. Interestingly, the significant increase in PAD impacted regional spending patterns. Thus, the flypaper effect phenomenon did not exist from 2005 to 2020. This implies that the central government can selectively empower local governments to levy appropriate local taxes and user fees. This can be done by providing new local tax sources, restructuring tax types, simplifying usage fee types, and harmonizing regional government regulations with the central government.","PeriodicalId":52606,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Bina Praja","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Examining Flypaper Effect in Indonesia: Evidence After Transferring Urban-Rural Land and Building Tax to Locals Government\",\"authors\":\"Raden Muhammad Afrizal, Khoirunurrofik Khoirunurrofik\",\"doi\":\"10.21787/jbp.14.2022.465-478\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In order to increase the tax power of local governments, the central government implemented a major reform in 2010 by transferring the Urban-Country Land and Buildings Tax (PBB-P2) to local governments. Although the tax contributes a significant portion of local government revenues, the spending behavior of local governments is questionable, and it is unclear whether public spending has been increased. This study examines the effect of strengthening PBB-P2 policy on increasing local revenue (PAD) and its impact on regional spending patterns, specifically whether there are still flypapers after policy reform. Applying a fixed-effects panel data method to Indonesian local governments from 2005 to 2020, we found that strengthening PBB-P2 policy had a significant positive impact on PAD. The positive effect was found to be significant one year (year +1) after policy implementation in each region, including for the province, district, and city, with the issuance of regional ordinances related to PBB-P2. Interestingly, the significant increase in PAD impacted regional spending patterns. Thus, the flypaper effect phenomenon did not exist from 2005 to 2020. This implies that the central government can selectively empower local governments to levy appropriate local taxes and user fees. This can be done by providing new local tax sources, restructuring tax types, simplifying usage fee types, and harmonizing regional government regulations with the central government.\",\"PeriodicalId\":52606,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Jurnal Bina Praja\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Jurnal Bina Praja\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21787/jbp.14.2022.465-478\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Bina Praja","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21787/jbp.14.2022.465-478","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

为了增加地方政府的税收权力,中央政府在2010年实施了一项重大改革,将城乡土地和建筑税(PBB-P2)移交给地方政府。尽管该税在地方政府收入中占很大一部分,但地方政府的支出行为值得怀疑,也不清楚公共支出是否有所增加。本研究考察了加强PBB-P2政策对增加地方收入的影响及其对地区支出模式的影响,特别是政策改革后是否仍有传单。将固定效应面板数据方法应用于2005年至2020年的印尼地方政府,我们发现加强PBB-P2政策对PAD产生了显著的积极影响。随着与PBB-P2相关的地区法令的颁布,在每个地区(包括省、区和市)的政策实施一年后(一年+1),发现积极影响是显著的。有趣的是,PAD的大幅增长影响了区域支出模式。因此,从2005年到2020年,飞纸效应现象并不存在。这意味着中央政府可以选择性地授权地方政府征收适当的地方税和用户费。这可以通过提供新的地方税收来源、调整税收类型、简化使用费类型以及协调地区政府法规与中央政府来实现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Examining Flypaper Effect in Indonesia: Evidence After Transferring Urban-Rural Land and Building Tax to Locals Government
In order to increase the tax power of local governments, the central government implemented a major reform in 2010 by transferring the Urban-Country Land and Buildings Tax (PBB-P2) to local governments. Although the tax contributes a significant portion of local government revenues, the spending behavior of local governments is questionable, and it is unclear whether public spending has been increased. This study examines the effect of strengthening PBB-P2 policy on increasing local revenue (PAD) and its impact on regional spending patterns, specifically whether there are still flypapers after policy reform. Applying a fixed-effects panel data method to Indonesian local governments from 2005 to 2020, we found that strengthening PBB-P2 policy had a significant positive impact on PAD. The positive effect was found to be significant one year (year +1) after policy implementation in each region, including for the province, district, and city, with the issuance of regional ordinances related to PBB-P2. Interestingly, the significant increase in PAD impacted regional spending patterns. Thus, the flypaper effect phenomenon did not exist from 2005 to 2020. This implies that the central government can selectively empower local governments to levy appropriate local taxes and user fees. This can be done by providing new local tax sources, restructuring tax types, simplifying usage fee types, and harmonizing regional government regulations with the central government.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
26
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信