新冠肺炎与工作和组织心理学的未来

IF 1.5 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED
A. Pérez-Nebra, Chrysavgi Sklaveniti, G. Islam, Ivana B. Petrović, J. Pickett, Makfire Alija, P. Matthijs Bal, Milena Tekeste, Milica Vukelić, S. Bazana, Zoe Sanderson
{"title":"新冠肺炎与工作和组织心理学的未来","authors":"A. Pérez-Nebra, Chrysavgi Sklaveniti, G. Islam, Ivana B. Petrović, J. Pickett, Makfire Alija, P. Matthijs Bal, Milena Tekeste, Milica Vukelić, S. Bazana, Zoe Sanderson","doi":"10.4102/sajip.v47i0.1854","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Orientation The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has caused a ‘coronafication’ of research and academia, including the instrumentalisation of academic research towards the demands of society and governments. Whilst an enormous number of special issues and articles are devoted on the topic, there are few fundamental reflections on how the current pandemic will affect science and work and organisational psychology in the long run. Research purpose The current overview, written by a group of members of the Future of Work and Organisational Psychology (FOWOP) Movement, focuses on the central issues relating to work and organisational psychology that have emerged as a result of the COVID-19 crisis. Motivation for the study The study discusses the inability of dominant theories in work and organisational psychology to understand contemporary problems and the need to advance the theoretical realm of work psychology. We also discuss the need for pluralism in methodologies to understand the post-COVID-19 workplace, the urgency of attending to neglected voices and populations during the COVID-19 crisis and teaching during COVID-19. Research approach/design and method This article uses conceptual argumentation. Main findings The COVID-19 crisis forces work psychology to address at least its theorising, methods, unheard voices and teaching in the COVID-19 crisis. Practical/managerial implications On the basis of this article, researchers and practitioners may be better aware of the neglected perspectives in the current pandemic. Contribution/value-add This article adds to the understanding of the future directions for a sustainable Work and Organisational Psychology as an applied scientific discipline during and beyond the COVID-19 crisis.","PeriodicalId":47235,"journal":{"name":"SA Journal of Industrial Psychology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"13","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"COVID-19 and the future of work and organisational psychology\",\"authors\":\"A. Pérez-Nebra, Chrysavgi Sklaveniti, G. Islam, Ivana B. Petrović, J. Pickett, Makfire Alija, P. Matthijs Bal, Milena Tekeste, Milica Vukelić, S. Bazana, Zoe Sanderson\",\"doi\":\"10.4102/sajip.v47i0.1854\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Orientation The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has caused a ‘coronafication’ of research and academia, including the instrumentalisation of academic research towards the demands of society and governments. Whilst an enormous number of special issues and articles are devoted on the topic, there are few fundamental reflections on how the current pandemic will affect science and work and organisational psychology in the long run. Research purpose The current overview, written by a group of members of the Future of Work and Organisational Psychology (FOWOP) Movement, focuses on the central issues relating to work and organisational psychology that have emerged as a result of the COVID-19 crisis. Motivation for the study The study discusses the inability of dominant theories in work and organisational psychology to understand contemporary problems and the need to advance the theoretical realm of work psychology. We also discuss the need for pluralism in methodologies to understand the post-COVID-19 workplace, the urgency of attending to neglected voices and populations during the COVID-19 crisis and teaching during COVID-19. Research approach/design and method This article uses conceptual argumentation. Main findings The COVID-19 crisis forces work psychology to address at least its theorising, methods, unheard voices and teaching in the COVID-19 crisis. Practical/managerial implications On the basis of this article, researchers and practitioners may be better aware of the neglected perspectives in the current pandemic. Contribution/value-add This article adds to the understanding of the future directions for a sustainable Work and Organisational Psychology as an applied scientific discipline during and beyond the COVID-19 crisis.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47235,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"SA Journal of Industrial Psychology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-05-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"13\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"SA Journal of Industrial Psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4102/sajip.v47i0.1854\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SA Journal of Industrial Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4102/sajip.v47i0.1854","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 13

摘要

方向2019冠状病毒病(新冠肺炎)大流行导致了研究和学术界的“冠状病毒化”,包括学术研究工具化以满足社会和政府的需求。虽然有大量的特刊和文章专门讨论这个话题,但从长远来看,对当前的疫情将如何影响科学、工作和组织心理学,几乎没有什么基本的思考。研究目的由未来工作与组织心理学(FOWOP)运动的一组成员撰写的最新综述,重点关注新冠肺炎危机导致的与工作和组织心理学相关的核心问题。本研究的动机本研究讨论了工作和组织心理学中的主导理论无法理解当代问题,以及推进工作心理学理论领域的必要性。我们还讨论了理解新冠肺炎后工作场所的方法多元化的必要性,新冠肺炎危机期间关注被忽视的声音和人群的紧迫性,以及新冠肺炎期间的教学。研究方法/设计和方法本文使用概念论证。主要发现新冠肺炎危机迫使工作心理学至少解决新冠肺炎危机中的理论、方法、闻所未闻的声音和教学问题。实践/管理意义在这篇文章的基础上,研究人员和从业者可能会更好地意识到当前疫情中被忽视的观点。贡献/价值-补充这篇文章增加了对新冠肺炎危机期间和之后可持续工作和组织心理学作为一门应用科学学科的未来方向的理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
COVID-19 and the future of work and organisational psychology
Orientation The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has caused a ‘coronafication’ of research and academia, including the instrumentalisation of academic research towards the demands of society and governments. Whilst an enormous number of special issues and articles are devoted on the topic, there are few fundamental reflections on how the current pandemic will affect science and work and organisational psychology in the long run. Research purpose The current overview, written by a group of members of the Future of Work and Organisational Psychology (FOWOP) Movement, focuses on the central issues relating to work and organisational psychology that have emerged as a result of the COVID-19 crisis. Motivation for the study The study discusses the inability of dominant theories in work and organisational psychology to understand contemporary problems and the need to advance the theoretical realm of work psychology. We also discuss the need for pluralism in methodologies to understand the post-COVID-19 workplace, the urgency of attending to neglected voices and populations during the COVID-19 crisis and teaching during COVID-19. Research approach/design and method This article uses conceptual argumentation. Main findings The COVID-19 crisis forces work psychology to address at least its theorising, methods, unheard voices and teaching in the COVID-19 crisis. Practical/managerial implications On the basis of this article, researchers and practitioners may be better aware of the neglected perspectives in the current pandemic. Contribution/value-add This article adds to the understanding of the future directions for a sustainable Work and Organisational Psychology as an applied scientific discipline during and beyond the COVID-19 crisis.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
14.30%
发文量
26
审稿时长
35 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信