伊朗与“国际社会”：伊朗核计划谈判的后殖民分析*

IF 0.6 Q3 POLITICAL SCIENCE

Asian Journal of Political Science Pub Date : 2018-06-13 DOI:10.1080/02185377.2018.1481441

Shampa Biswas

{"title":"伊朗与“国际社会”：伊朗核计划谈判的后殖民分析*","authors":"Shampa Biswas","doi":"10.1080/02185377.2018.1481441","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This paper undertakes an analysis of the underlying presuppositions and terms of the international negotiations on the Iranian nuclear programme as covered in the mainstream Western media during 2013–14. Examining the deep-seated Orientalist presuppositions underlying the civilizational narrative through which the rivalry between the US/West and Iran is described, the paper argues that the notions of ‘nuclear responsibility’, ‘international community’, and ‘global peace’ generated by such representations obscure global power and hierarchy. In effect, such a discourse ensures that Iran remains caught in the spotlight of dangerous nuclear transgressions while the nuclear programme of a normative West is rendered unremarkable.","PeriodicalId":44333,"journal":{"name":"Asian Journal of Political Science","volume":"26 1","pages":"331 - 351"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/02185377.2018.1481441","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Iran v ‘the international community’: a postcolonial analysis of the negotiations on the Iranian nuclear program*\",\"authors\":\"Shampa Biswas\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/02185377.2018.1481441\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT This paper undertakes an analysis of the underlying presuppositions and terms of the international negotiations on the Iranian nuclear programme as covered in the mainstream Western media during 2013–14. Examining the deep-seated Orientalist presuppositions underlying the civilizational narrative through which the rivalry between the US/West and Iran is described, the paper argues that the notions of ‘nuclear responsibility’, ‘international community’, and ‘global peace’ generated by such representations obscure global power and hierarchy. In effect, such a discourse ensures that Iran remains caught in the spotlight of dangerous nuclear transgressions while the nuclear programme of a normative West is rendered unremarkable.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44333,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Asian Journal of Political Science\",\"volume\":\"26 1\",\"pages\":\"331 - 351\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-06-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/02185377.2018.1481441\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Asian Journal of Political Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/02185377.2018.1481441\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"POLITICAL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Journal of Political Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02185377.2018.1481441","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 2

摘要

本文分析了2013-14年西方主流媒体报道的伊朗核计划国际谈判的基本前提和条件。本文考察了东方主义者根深蒂固的预设，这些预设是描述美国/西方和伊朗之间竞争的文明叙事的基础，认为这种表述所产生的“核责任”、“国际社会”和“全球和平”的概念模糊了全球权力和等级制度。实际上，这样的言论确保了伊朗仍然处于危险的核违法行为的聚光灯下，而规范的西方的核计划却变得不起眼。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Iran v ‘the international community’: a postcolonial analysis of the negotiations on the Iranian nuclear program*

ABSTRACT This paper undertakes an analysis of the underlying presuppositions and terms of the international negotiations on the Iranian nuclear programme as covered in the mainstream Western media during 2013–14. Examining the deep-seated Orientalist presuppositions underlying the civilizational narrative through which the rivalry between the US/West and Iran is described, the paper argues that the notions of ‘nuclear responsibility’, ‘international community’, and ‘global peace’ generated by such representations obscure global power and hierarchy. In effect, such a discourse ensures that Iran remains caught in the spotlight of dangerous nuclear transgressions while the nuclear programme of a normative West is rendered unremarkable.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Asian Journal of Political Science POLITICAL SCIENCE-

CiteScore

2.00

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： Asian Journal of Political Science ( AJPS) is an international refereed journal affiliated to the Graduate School of Public Administration, Seoul National University. Published since 1993, AJPS is a leading journal on Asian politics and governance. It publishes high-quality original articles in major areas of political science, including comparative politics, political thought, international relations, public policy, and public administration, with specific reference to Asian regions and countries. AJPS aims to address some of the most contemporary political and administrative issues in Asia (especially in East, South, and Southeast Asia) at the local, national, and global levels. The journal can be of great value to academic experts, researchers, and students in the above areas of political science as well as to practical policy makers, state institutions, and international agencies.