凯尔特世界的记忆和远见:从中世纪晚期到现代时期的观点

IF 0.5 2区 历史学 Q1 HISTORY
M. Carew
{"title":"凯尔特世界的记忆和远见:从中世纪晚期到现代时期的观点","authors":"M. Carew","doi":"10.1080/14780038.2022.2148610","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"thetic qualities, often noted in the records: for instance, a royal letter requested the replacement of the wooden gatehouse at Worcester Castle with a ‘fine and beautiful’ stone one (p.158), and the king’s expenditure upon landscape features with economic value – fishponds, dovecots, and of course hunting parks – are carefully scrutinised. Nor was court life confined to permanent residences such as palaces and fortresses: an array of expensive pavilions eased the discomforts of John’s campaigns, while his incessant travels were reflected in the prominence of palfreys (riding horses) in royal financial transactions. The court culture that emerges from Thomas’ meticulous study is one where, he argues, ‘soft power’ played an important part. Ceremonies, public gestures, and symbolic gift-giving formed an integral part of the exercise of royal power, but John’s personal flaws and crass misjudgements frequently undercut his acts of largesse, limiting his attempts to use conspicuous display to bind his courtiers to him; unsurprisingly, many joined the great revolt against him. The book’s final chapter compares John’s with other courts, both from his own time, including in the Byzantine and Islamic spheres, and from other periods: Thomas concludes that despite regional variations, much of the protocol and practice of John’s court was similar to contemporary courts elsewhere in Europe and in the Mediterranean countries, but pales in comparison with late medieval and early modern court culture. Here the author engages with Norbert Elias’s argument that early modern European princely courts had a ‘civilising process’ that tamed previously turbulent warrior aristocracies: while recognising the limitations of using a single reign to test Elias’s interpretations, Thomas argues instead that the courts of the early thirteenth century should be seen as just one stage in a much longer process of evolution from early medieval courts to their lavish Renaissance and early modern counterparts. The intricacies of one court from that process are revealed here in vivid detail, thanks in part to the very records that have distracted historians from its cultural life until now.","PeriodicalId":45240,"journal":{"name":"Cultural & Social History","volume":"19 1","pages":"606 - 608"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Memory and Foresight in the Celtic World: Perspectives from the Late Medieval through Modern Periods\",\"authors\":\"M. Carew\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/14780038.2022.2148610\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"thetic qualities, often noted in the records: for instance, a royal letter requested the replacement of the wooden gatehouse at Worcester Castle with a ‘fine and beautiful’ stone one (p.158), and the king’s expenditure upon landscape features with economic value – fishponds, dovecots, and of course hunting parks – are carefully scrutinised. Nor was court life confined to permanent residences such as palaces and fortresses: an array of expensive pavilions eased the discomforts of John’s campaigns, while his incessant travels were reflected in the prominence of palfreys (riding horses) in royal financial transactions. The court culture that emerges from Thomas’ meticulous study is one where, he argues, ‘soft power’ played an important part. Ceremonies, public gestures, and symbolic gift-giving formed an integral part of the exercise of royal power, but John’s personal flaws and crass misjudgements frequently undercut his acts of largesse, limiting his attempts to use conspicuous display to bind his courtiers to him; unsurprisingly, many joined the great revolt against him. The book’s final chapter compares John’s with other courts, both from his own time, including in the Byzantine and Islamic spheres, and from other periods: Thomas concludes that despite regional variations, much of the protocol and practice of John’s court was similar to contemporary courts elsewhere in Europe and in the Mediterranean countries, but pales in comparison with late medieval and early modern court culture. Here the author engages with Norbert Elias’s argument that early modern European princely courts had a ‘civilising process’ that tamed previously turbulent warrior aristocracies: while recognising the limitations of using a single reign to test Elias’s interpretations, Thomas argues instead that the courts of the early thirteenth century should be seen as just one stage in a much longer process of evolution from early medieval courts to their lavish Renaissance and early modern counterparts. The intricacies of one court from that process are revealed here in vivid detail, thanks in part to the very records that have distracted historians from its cultural life until now.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45240,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cultural & Social History\",\"volume\":\"19 1\",\"pages\":\"606 - 608\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cultural & Social History\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/14780038.2022.2148610\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"历史学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HISTORY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cultural & Social History","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14780038.2022.2148610","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

记录中经常提到的审美品质:例如,一封皇家信件要求将伍斯特城堡的木制门楼换成“精美而美丽”的石头门楼(第158页),国王在具有经济价值的景观上的支出——鱼塘、鸽舍,当然还有狩猎公园——都被仔细审查。宫廷生活也不局限于宫殿和堡垒这样的永久住所:一排昂贵的亭子缓解了约翰竞选时的不适,而他不间断的旅行则反映在皇家金融交易中骑马的突出地位。托马斯认为,在他细致的研究中出现的宫廷文化中,“软实力”发挥了重要作用。仪式,公共姿态和象征性的礼物赠送是王权行使的组成部分,但约翰的个人缺陷和严重的错误判断经常削弱他的慷慨行为,限制了他利用显眼的展示来束缚他的朝臣的尝试;不出所料,许多人加入了反对他的大起义。这本书的最后一章将约翰的宫廷与其他宫廷进行了比较,包括他自己的时代,包括拜占庭和伊斯兰领域,以及其他时期:托马斯得出结论,尽管地区差异,约翰宫廷的许多礼仪和做法与欧洲其他地方和地中海国家的当代宫廷相似,但与中世纪晚期和现代早期的宫廷文化相比就相形见绌了。在这里,作者与诺伯特·埃利亚斯(Norbert Elias)的论点进行了接触,即早期现代欧洲王权宫廷有一个“文明过程”,驯服了以前动荡不安的战士贵族:虽然认识到使用单一统治来检验埃利亚斯的解释的局限性,但托马斯认为,13世纪早期的宫廷应该被视为从早期中世纪宫廷到奢华的文艺复兴时期和早期现代对手的漫长进化过程中的一个阶段。其中一个宫廷在这一过程中错综复杂的细节在这里得到了生动的揭示,部分原因是这些记录一直让历史学家们从它的文化生活中分心,直到现在。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Memory and Foresight in the Celtic World: Perspectives from the Late Medieval through Modern Periods
thetic qualities, often noted in the records: for instance, a royal letter requested the replacement of the wooden gatehouse at Worcester Castle with a ‘fine and beautiful’ stone one (p.158), and the king’s expenditure upon landscape features with economic value – fishponds, dovecots, and of course hunting parks – are carefully scrutinised. Nor was court life confined to permanent residences such as palaces and fortresses: an array of expensive pavilions eased the discomforts of John’s campaigns, while his incessant travels were reflected in the prominence of palfreys (riding horses) in royal financial transactions. The court culture that emerges from Thomas’ meticulous study is one where, he argues, ‘soft power’ played an important part. Ceremonies, public gestures, and symbolic gift-giving formed an integral part of the exercise of royal power, but John’s personal flaws and crass misjudgements frequently undercut his acts of largesse, limiting his attempts to use conspicuous display to bind his courtiers to him; unsurprisingly, many joined the great revolt against him. The book’s final chapter compares John’s with other courts, both from his own time, including in the Byzantine and Islamic spheres, and from other periods: Thomas concludes that despite regional variations, much of the protocol and practice of John’s court was similar to contemporary courts elsewhere in Europe and in the Mediterranean countries, but pales in comparison with late medieval and early modern court culture. Here the author engages with Norbert Elias’s argument that early modern European princely courts had a ‘civilising process’ that tamed previously turbulent warrior aristocracies: while recognising the limitations of using a single reign to test Elias’s interpretations, Thomas argues instead that the courts of the early thirteenth century should be seen as just one stage in a much longer process of evolution from early medieval courts to their lavish Renaissance and early modern counterparts. The intricacies of one court from that process are revealed here in vivid detail, thanks in part to the very records that have distracted historians from its cultural life until now.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
16.70%
发文量
72
期刊介绍: Cultural & Social History is published on behalf of the Social History Society (SHS). Members receive the journal as part of their membership package. To join the Society, please download an application form on the Society"s website and follow the instructions provided.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信