心理困扰在亲密伴侣暴力受害和实施中的独特作用

IF 1 4区 心理学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
C. Segrin, R. A. Cooper
{"title":"心理困扰在亲密伴侣暴力受害和实施中的独特作用","authors":"C. Segrin, R. A. Cooper","doi":"10.1521/jscp.2022.41.4.398","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Intimate partner violence (IPV) reliably co-occurs with psychological distress. However, understanding the precise nature of the association between these two classes of variables, as potential cause or effect, is complicated by the fact that victimization of IPV is not often studied controlling for simultaneous perpetration, and vice versa. It is therefore important to control for one form of IPV when testing predictors of the other to accurately understand the extent to which psychological distress may predispose people to these serious interpersonal problems. Method: Two national survey studies were conducted to test the unique associations between victimization and perpetration of IPV with psychological distress. In the first study, 773 adults completed survey measures of IPV (victimization and perpetration) and psychological distress (depression and stress). In the second study, 389 participants completed the same measures as in Study 1, but at two waves separated by three months (T1-T2 follow-up rate 73%). Results: In study 1, both depression and stress were concurrently associated with perpetrating IPV, when controlling for victimization. However, only depression was associated with victimization, after controlling for perpetration. Results of study 2 showed that both depression and stress are prospectively associated with IPV victimization. However, they are not prospectively associated with IPV perpetration, net the effect of IPV victimization. Discussion: These results are consistent with the interactional model of depression by showing that people with depression, and high levels of stress, are at heightened risk for experiencing IPV, even after controlling for their own propensity to enact IPV.","PeriodicalId":48202,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Unique Effects of Psychological Distress in Victimization and Perpetration of Intimate Partner Violence\",\"authors\":\"C. Segrin, R. A. Cooper\",\"doi\":\"10.1521/jscp.2022.41.4.398\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction: Intimate partner violence (IPV) reliably co-occurs with psychological distress. However, understanding the precise nature of the association between these two classes of variables, as potential cause or effect, is complicated by the fact that victimization of IPV is not often studied controlling for simultaneous perpetration, and vice versa. It is therefore important to control for one form of IPV when testing predictors of the other to accurately understand the extent to which psychological distress may predispose people to these serious interpersonal problems. Method: Two national survey studies were conducted to test the unique associations between victimization and perpetration of IPV with psychological distress. In the first study, 773 adults completed survey measures of IPV (victimization and perpetration) and psychological distress (depression and stress). In the second study, 389 participants completed the same measures as in Study 1, but at two waves separated by three months (T1-T2 follow-up rate 73%). Results: In study 1, both depression and stress were concurrently associated with perpetrating IPV, when controlling for victimization. However, only depression was associated with victimization, after controlling for perpetration. Results of study 2 showed that both depression and stress are prospectively associated with IPV victimization. However, they are not prospectively associated with IPV perpetration, net the effect of IPV victimization. Discussion: These results are consistent with the interactional model of depression by showing that people with depression, and high levels of stress, are at heightened risk for experiencing IPV, even after controlling for their own propensity to enact IPV.\",\"PeriodicalId\":48202,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1521/jscp.2022.41.4.398\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1521/jscp.2022.41.4.398","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

引言:亲密伴侣暴力(IPV)确实与心理困扰同时发生。然而,要理解这两类变量之间关联的确切性质,即潜在的因果关系,就变得复杂起来,因为人们并不经常研究IPV的受害情况,以控制同时实施,反之亦然。因此,在测试另一种IPV的预测因素时,控制一种形式的IPV是很重要的,以准确了解心理困扰可能在多大程度上使人们容易出现这些严重的人际关系问题。方法:进行了两项全国性调查研究,以测试IPV的受害和实施与心理困扰之间的独特联系。在第一项研究中,773名成年人完成了IPV(受害和犯罪)和心理困扰(抑郁和压力)的调查测量。在第二项研究中,389名参与者完成了与研究1相同的测量,但在间隔三个月的两波测量中(T1-T2随访率73%)。结果:在研究1中,在控制受害情况时,抑郁和压力都与IPV的实施同时相关。然而,在控制了犯罪后,只有抑郁症与受害有关。研究2的结果表明,抑郁和压力都与IPV的受害有着前瞻性的相关性。然而,它们与IPV的实施没有前瞻性联系,净IPV受害的影响。讨论:这些结果与抑郁症的相互作用模型一致,表明患有抑郁症和高压力的人经历IPV的风险更高,即使在控制了他们自己实施IPV的倾向之后也是如此。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Unique Effects of Psychological Distress in Victimization and Perpetration of Intimate Partner Violence
Introduction: Intimate partner violence (IPV) reliably co-occurs with psychological distress. However, understanding the precise nature of the association between these two classes of variables, as potential cause or effect, is complicated by the fact that victimization of IPV is not often studied controlling for simultaneous perpetration, and vice versa. It is therefore important to control for one form of IPV when testing predictors of the other to accurately understand the extent to which psychological distress may predispose people to these serious interpersonal problems. Method: Two national survey studies were conducted to test the unique associations between victimization and perpetration of IPV with psychological distress. In the first study, 773 adults completed survey measures of IPV (victimization and perpetration) and psychological distress (depression and stress). In the second study, 389 participants completed the same measures as in Study 1, but at two waves separated by three months (T1-T2 follow-up rate 73%). Results: In study 1, both depression and stress were concurrently associated with perpetrating IPV, when controlling for victimization. However, only depression was associated with victimization, after controlling for perpetration. Results of study 2 showed that both depression and stress are prospectively associated with IPV victimization. However, they are not prospectively associated with IPV perpetration, net the effect of IPV victimization. Discussion: These results are consistent with the interactional model of depression by showing that people with depression, and high levels of stress, are at heightened risk for experiencing IPV, even after controlling for their own propensity to enact IPV.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
20
期刊介绍: This journal is devoted to the application of theory and research from social psychology toward the better understanding of human adaptation and adjustment, including both the alleviation of psychological problems and distress (e.g., psychopathology) and the enhancement of psychological well-being among the psychologically healthy. Topics of interest include (but are not limited to) traditionally defined psychopathology (e.g., depression), common emotional and behavioral problems in living (e.g., conflicts in close relationships), the enhancement of subjective well-being, and the processes of psychological change in everyday life (e.g., self-regulation) and professional settings (e.g., psychotherapy and counseling). Articles reporting the results of theory-driven empirical research are given priority, but theoretical articles, review articles, clinical case studies, and essays on professional issues are also welcome. Articles describing the development of new scales (personality or otherwise) or the revision of existing scales are not appropriate for this journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信