一种定位简单条形试验的方法,以提高试验效率,最大化葡萄园可变性的决策价值

IF 2.2 3区 农林科学 Q3 FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Xingyi Song, R. Bramley, K. Evans
{"title":"一种定位简单条形试验的方法,以提高试验效率,最大化葡萄园可变性的决策价值","authors":"Xingyi Song, R. Bramley, K. Evans","doi":"10.20870/oeno-one.2023.57.1.5542","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The main difficulties grapegrowers and consultants face in obtaining robust trial results include time and labour to collect data and land variability that confounds trial results. Spatial approaches that use whole-field designs, sensing technologies and geostatistical analysis enable more efficient data collection and account for the impact of spatial variation on crop responses while generating statistically robust results. However, the practical application of these approaches for vineyard trials requires affordable automation of measurements of viticultural variables and access to skills for geostatistics. A strip approach has been developed to simplify experimentation by allowing the farmer to use a single crop row to trial and analyse data in a spreadsheet. However, guidance is needed as to how to position trial strips in a vineyard block to reveal likely treatment effects across the entire block. Here, we investigated using a covariate to a response variable of interest to position a strip trial to infer treatment effects beyond the trial strip. Strip trials were simulated for two experiments: one comparing three treatments for vineyard floor management on grape yield and another comparing two spray programs for powdery mildew control. Useful covariates for yield or mildew severity were determined using correlation analyses. Trial results were analysed using a moving pairwise comparison of treatments and a moving average of the covariates. Simulated trial strips that incorporated a range of variation in a useful covariate close to that encountered in the whole block showed how yield or mildew severity varied with the covariates along the strips. Importantly, such results provided information about likely crop responses in other parts of the block according to variation in the covariates, thus contributing to better-informed decision-making. Compared to whole-field approaches, this strip approach is more efficient and simpler for growers to implement.","PeriodicalId":19510,"journal":{"name":"OENO One","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A method to position a simple strip trial to improve trial efficiency and maximise the value of vineyard variability for decision-making\",\"authors\":\"Xingyi Song, R. Bramley, K. Evans\",\"doi\":\"10.20870/oeno-one.2023.57.1.5542\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The main difficulties grapegrowers and consultants face in obtaining robust trial results include time and labour to collect data and land variability that confounds trial results. Spatial approaches that use whole-field designs, sensing technologies and geostatistical analysis enable more efficient data collection and account for the impact of spatial variation on crop responses while generating statistically robust results. However, the practical application of these approaches for vineyard trials requires affordable automation of measurements of viticultural variables and access to skills for geostatistics. A strip approach has been developed to simplify experimentation by allowing the farmer to use a single crop row to trial and analyse data in a spreadsheet. However, guidance is needed as to how to position trial strips in a vineyard block to reveal likely treatment effects across the entire block. Here, we investigated using a covariate to a response variable of interest to position a strip trial to infer treatment effects beyond the trial strip. Strip trials were simulated for two experiments: one comparing three treatments for vineyard floor management on grape yield and another comparing two spray programs for powdery mildew control. Useful covariates for yield or mildew severity were determined using correlation analyses. Trial results were analysed using a moving pairwise comparison of treatments and a moving average of the covariates. Simulated trial strips that incorporated a range of variation in a useful covariate close to that encountered in the whole block showed how yield or mildew severity varied with the covariates along the strips. Importantly, such results provided information about likely crop responses in other parts of the block according to variation in the covariates, thus contributing to better-informed decision-making. Compared to whole-field approaches, this strip approach is more efficient and simpler for growers to implement.\",\"PeriodicalId\":19510,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"OENO One\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"OENO One\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.20870/oeno-one.2023.57.1.5542\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"OENO One","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20870/oeno-one.2023.57.1.5542","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

葡萄种植者和顾问在获得可靠的试验结果方面面临的主要困难包括收集数据的时间和劳动力,以及混淆试验结果的土地变异性。使用整地设计、传感技术和地质统计分析的空间方法能够更有效地收集数据,并考虑到空间变化对作物反应的影响,同时产生统计上稳健的结果。然而,这些方法在葡萄园试验中的实际应用需要对葡萄栽培变量的测量进行负担得起的自动化,并获得地质统计学技能。已经开发了一种条形方法,通过允许农民使用单个作物行来试验和分析电子表格中的数据来简化实验。然而,需要指导如何在葡萄园区块中放置试验条,以揭示整个区块可能的治疗效果。在这里,我们研究了使用感兴趣的反应变量的协变来定位条形试验,以推断试验条形之外的治疗效果。模拟了两个试验的条带试验:一个试验比较了葡萄园地面管理对葡萄产量的三种处理,另一个试验则比较了两种喷雾方案对白粉病的控制。使用相关分析确定了产量或霉菌严重程度的有用协变量。使用治疗的移动成对比较和协变量的移动平均值来分析试验结果。模拟试验条带的有用协变量的变化范围与整个区块中遇到的协变量接近,显示了产量或霉菌严重程度如何随条带的协变量而变化。重要的是,这些结果根据协变量的变化提供了关于区块其他部分可能的作物反应的信息,从而有助于更好地进行知情决策。与整地方法相比,这种条带方法对种植者来说更有效、更简单。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A method to position a simple strip trial to improve trial efficiency and maximise the value of vineyard variability for decision-making
The main difficulties grapegrowers and consultants face in obtaining robust trial results include time and labour to collect data and land variability that confounds trial results. Spatial approaches that use whole-field designs, sensing technologies and geostatistical analysis enable more efficient data collection and account for the impact of spatial variation on crop responses while generating statistically robust results. However, the practical application of these approaches for vineyard trials requires affordable automation of measurements of viticultural variables and access to skills for geostatistics. A strip approach has been developed to simplify experimentation by allowing the farmer to use a single crop row to trial and analyse data in a spreadsheet. However, guidance is needed as to how to position trial strips in a vineyard block to reveal likely treatment effects across the entire block. Here, we investigated using a covariate to a response variable of interest to position a strip trial to infer treatment effects beyond the trial strip. Strip trials were simulated for two experiments: one comparing three treatments for vineyard floor management on grape yield and another comparing two spray programs for powdery mildew control. Useful covariates for yield or mildew severity were determined using correlation analyses. Trial results were analysed using a moving pairwise comparison of treatments and a moving average of the covariates. Simulated trial strips that incorporated a range of variation in a useful covariate close to that encountered in the whole block showed how yield or mildew severity varied with the covariates along the strips. Importantly, such results provided information about likely crop responses in other parts of the block according to variation in the covariates, thus contributing to better-informed decision-making. Compared to whole-field approaches, this strip approach is more efficient and simpler for growers to implement.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
OENO One
OENO One Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Food Science
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
13.80%
发文量
85
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍: OENO One is a peer-reviewed journal that publishes original research, reviews, mini-reviews, short communications, perspectives and spotlights in the areas of viticulture, grapevine physiology, genomics and genetics, oenology, winemaking technology and processes, wine chemistry and quality, analytical chemistry, microbiology, sensory and consumer sciences, safety and health. OENO One belongs to the International Viticulture and Enology Society - IVES, an academic association dedicated to viticulture and enology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信