过渡时期司法中的住房、土地和财产权

IF 1.7 1区 社会学 Q2 INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS
J. Unruh, M. A. Abdul-Jalil
{"title":"过渡时期司法中的住房、土地和财产权","authors":"J. Unruh, M. A. Abdul-Jalil","doi":"10.1093/IJTJ/IJAB004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"I N T R O D U C T I O N Housing, land and property (HLP) raise some of the most provocative and contentious issues in transitional justice scholarship and practice. HLP-related forced displacement, damage and destruction and restitution for historical injustices are at the heart of many transitional justice policy debates, with repercussions for responses by the international community, governments and civil society. Transitional justice scholarship has made great strides in trying to answer fundamental questions concerning injustices related to HLP and economic, social and cultural rights – and the questions are many. Does transitional justice provide a sufficient foundation for understanding how best to respond to HLP grievances? Are the human rights-based legal frameworks used in transitional justice prejudiced in how they shape our understanding of HLP problems, and do they provide appropriate redress across a variety of cultural and historical trajectories? What is the place of traditional, indigenous and customary laws and norms in transitional justice efforts relating to HLP? Transitional justice has always given prominence to the symbolic value of measures of justice and redress. Does this lens attend to the various forms of injustice in the context of HLP grievances and the material and spatial needs of the aggrieved? Can it help make sense of both the individual and the group identities embedded in HLP questions? Since HLP issues are highly politicized and ritualized in political discourse, how can local actors reclaim HLP problem definitions and proposed solutions from political entrepreneurs? Does transitional justice provide effective avenues for marginalized groups to engage in current debates, voice their experiences and participate in processes of restitution? This Special Issue of IJTJ seeks to deepen the debate on these issues and contribute to answering some of the questions facing scholars and practitioners working on HLP in transitional contexts.","PeriodicalId":46927,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Transitional Justice","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Housing, Land and Property Rights in Transitional Justice\",\"authors\":\"J. Unruh, M. A. Abdul-Jalil\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/IJTJ/IJAB004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"I N T R O D U C T I O N Housing, land and property (HLP) raise some of the most provocative and contentious issues in transitional justice scholarship and practice. HLP-related forced displacement, damage and destruction and restitution for historical injustices are at the heart of many transitional justice policy debates, with repercussions for responses by the international community, governments and civil society. Transitional justice scholarship has made great strides in trying to answer fundamental questions concerning injustices related to HLP and economic, social and cultural rights – and the questions are many. Does transitional justice provide a sufficient foundation for understanding how best to respond to HLP grievances? Are the human rights-based legal frameworks used in transitional justice prejudiced in how they shape our understanding of HLP problems, and do they provide appropriate redress across a variety of cultural and historical trajectories? What is the place of traditional, indigenous and customary laws and norms in transitional justice efforts relating to HLP? Transitional justice has always given prominence to the symbolic value of measures of justice and redress. Does this lens attend to the various forms of injustice in the context of HLP grievances and the material and spatial needs of the aggrieved? Can it help make sense of both the individual and the group identities embedded in HLP questions? Since HLP issues are highly politicized and ritualized in political discourse, how can local actors reclaim HLP problem definitions and proposed solutions from political entrepreneurs? Does transitional justice provide effective avenues for marginalized groups to engage in current debates, voice their experiences and participate in processes of restitution? This Special Issue of IJTJ seeks to deepen the debate on these issues and contribute to answering some of the questions facing scholars and practitioners working on HLP in transitional contexts.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46927,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Transitional Justice\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-05-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Transitional Justice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/IJTJ/IJAB004\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Transitional Justice","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/IJTJ/IJAB004","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

I N T R O D U C T I O N住房、土地和财产(HLP)提出了过渡时期司法学术和实践中一些最具挑衅性和争议性的问题。与HLP有关的强迫流离失所、破坏和破坏以及对历史不公正的恢复是许多过渡时期司法政策辩论的核心,对国际社会、政府和民间社会的反应产生了影响。过渡时期司法学术在试图回答与人权高专办以及经济、社会和文化权利有关的不公正的根本问题方面取得了长足进步,问题很多。过渡时期司法是否为理解如何最好地回应HLP的不满提供了充分的基础?过渡时期司法中使用的基于人权的法律框架在塑造我们对HLP问题的理解方面是否存在偏见,它们是否在各种文化和历史轨迹中提供了适当的补救?传统、土著和习惯法律和规范在与人权高专办有关的过渡司法工作中的地位如何?过渡时期司法始终突出司法和补救措施的象征性价值。这个镜头是否关注了HLP申诉背景下的各种形式的不公正以及被申诉人的物质和空间需求?它能帮助理解HLP问题中嵌入的个人和群体身份吗?由于HLP问题在政治话语中高度政治化和仪式化,当地行动者如何从政治企业家那里收回HLP问题的定义和提出的解决方案?过渡时期司法是否为边缘化群体提供了参与当前辩论、表达经验和参与归还进程的有效途径?本期IJTJ特刊旨在加深对这些问题的辩论,并有助于回答在过渡背景下从事HLP工作的学者和从业者面临的一些问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Housing, Land and Property Rights in Transitional Justice
I N T R O D U C T I O N Housing, land and property (HLP) raise some of the most provocative and contentious issues in transitional justice scholarship and practice. HLP-related forced displacement, damage and destruction and restitution for historical injustices are at the heart of many transitional justice policy debates, with repercussions for responses by the international community, governments and civil society. Transitional justice scholarship has made great strides in trying to answer fundamental questions concerning injustices related to HLP and economic, social and cultural rights – and the questions are many. Does transitional justice provide a sufficient foundation for understanding how best to respond to HLP grievances? Are the human rights-based legal frameworks used in transitional justice prejudiced in how they shape our understanding of HLP problems, and do they provide appropriate redress across a variety of cultural and historical trajectories? What is the place of traditional, indigenous and customary laws and norms in transitional justice efforts relating to HLP? Transitional justice has always given prominence to the symbolic value of measures of justice and redress. Does this lens attend to the various forms of injustice in the context of HLP grievances and the material and spatial needs of the aggrieved? Can it help make sense of both the individual and the group identities embedded in HLP questions? Since HLP issues are highly politicized and ritualized in political discourse, how can local actors reclaim HLP problem definitions and proposed solutions from political entrepreneurs? Does transitional justice provide effective avenues for marginalized groups to engage in current debates, voice their experiences and participate in processes of restitution? This Special Issue of IJTJ seeks to deepen the debate on these issues and contribute to answering some of the questions facing scholars and practitioners working on HLP in transitional contexts.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
31.20%
发文量
37
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信