社论:广告对消费者价格影响的新思考

IF 5.3 3区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS
C. R. Taylor
{"title":"社论:广告对消费者价格影响的新思考","authors":"C. R. Taylor","doi":"10.1080/02650487.2023.2183558","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"after years of following the academic literature on advertising, i continued to believe that the economic effects of advertising are one of the most understudied topics. in general, continued study of issues associated with society is needed, but it seems that in this context, economic issues are not studied as frequently as several other societal issues that are also important, and likely make for easier reading (see e.g., Kordrostami and laczniak 2022; Wulf, et al., 2022; Hartmann et al, 2022) for examples of strong work on current social issues). against this backdrop, i was pleased to see that the advertising association has published an update to laurence Green’s (2016) thoughtful white paper titled ‘does advertising increase Consumer Prices’, and i would like to use this space to encourage those who are interested to read it. as outlined by albion and Farris (1980), the debate over whether advertising expenditures in a product category lower or raise prices has often been addressed in the context of opposing views of advertising role in society. in short, the advertising = Market Power school argues that large advertising expenditures have several negative impacts on an industry, including higher barriers to entry and high concentration ratios, which facilitates collusion and enables the charging of higher prices (ornstein 1977). the advertising = information school suggests opposite effects, arguing that advertising increases consumer knowledge by providing information about product features, prices and quality, thereby reducing search costs and facilitating competition in a way that decreased industry concentration and leads to lower prices (Mcauliffe 1987). While it is beyond the scope of this editorial to discuss all prior research on the economic effects of advertising, my own prior review of academic literature suggests that the weight of the evidence, conducted mostly in the 1990s or before favors the notion that while the effect size may not be large, aggregate and expenditures in an industry place downward pressure on prices (taylor 2013). in spite of this, some studies or discussions continue to make opposite assumptions (rotfeld and taylor 2009). Green (2016) makes the same observation, stating, ‘the prosaic conclusion of “the man on the street” and of many commentators and even policymakers – that advertising puts prices up, if only to pay for the cost of the activity itself—is accepted without argument’. Green (2016) argues that the relationship between advertising and price is nuanced. on one hand, he notes, price should be viewed as something that advertising is able to influence and potentially bring more return on investment by reinforcing that a product is worth paying more for. on the other hand, Green observes that there are many other ways that advertising can lower prices, by promoting competition among brands or retailers, and by contributing to economies of scale and greater innovation. He also notes that advertising helps fund media consumption. the arguments for both the upward and downward pressures is more fully fleshed out in the 2006 white paper and is worth the read. https://doi.org/10.1080/02650487.2023.2183558","PeriodicalId":48111,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Advertising","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Editorial: New Thoughts on Advertising’s Impact on Consumer Prices\",\"authors\":\"C. R. Taylor\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/02650487.2023.2183558\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"after years of following the academic literature on advertising, i continued to believe that the economic effects of advertising are one of the most understudied topics. in general, continued study of issues associated with society is needed, but it seems that in this context, economic issues are not studied as frequently as several other societal issues that are also important, and likely make for easier reading (see e.g., Kordrostami and laczniak 2022; Wulf, et al., 2022; Hartmann et al, 2022) for examples of strong work on current social issues). against this backdrop, i was pleased to see that the advertising association has published an update to laurence Green’s (2016) thoughtful white paper titled ‘does advertising increase Consumer Prices’, and i would like to use this space to encourage those who are interested to read it. as outlined by albion and Farris (1980), the debate over whether advertising expenditures in a product category lower or raise prices has often been addressed in the context of opposing views of advertising role in society. in short, the advertising = Market Power school argues that large advertising expenditures have several negative impacts on an industry, including higher barriers to entry and high concentration ratios, which facilitates collusion and enables the charging of higher prices (ornstein 1977). the advertising = information school suggests opposite effects, arguing that advertising increases consumer knowledge by providing information about product features, prices and quality, thereby reducing search costs and facilitating competition in a way that decreased industry concentration and leads to lower prices (Mcauliffe 1987). While it is beyond the scope of this editorial to discuss all prior research on the economic effects of advertising, my own prior review of academic literature suggests that the weight of the evidence, conducted mostly in the 1990s or before favors the notion that while the effect size may not be large, aggregate and expenditures in an industry place downward pressure on prices (taylor 2013). in spite of this, some studies or discussions continue to make opposite assumptions (rotfeld and taylor 2009). Green (2016) makes the same observation, stating, ‘the prosaic conclusion of “the man on the street” and of many commentators and even policymakers – that advertising puts prices up, if only to pay for the cost of the activity itself—is accepted without argument’. Green (2016) argues that the relationship between advertising and price is nuanced. on one hand, he notes, price should be viewed as something that advertising is able to influence and potentially bring more return on investment by reinforcing that a product is worth paying more for. on the other hand, Green observes that there are many other ways that advertising can lower prices, by promoting competition among brands or retailers, and by contributing to economies of scale and greater innovation. He also notes that advertising helps fund media consumption. the arguments for both the upward and downward pressures is more fully fleshed out in the 2006 white paper and is worth the read. https://doi.org/10.1080/02650487.2023.2183558\",\"PeriodicalId\":48111,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Advertising\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-02-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Advertising\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/02650487.2023.2183558\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Advertising","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02650487.2023.2183558","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在研究了多年关于广告的学术文献之后,我仍然认为广告的经济效应是最未被充分研究的话题之一。总的来说,需要继续研究与社会相关的问题,但在这种情况下,经济问题的研究频率似乎不如其他几个同样重要的社会问题那么高,而且可能更容易阅读(参见例如Kordrostami和laczniak 2022;Wulf等,2022;Hartmann et al, 2022),例如对当前社会问题的强有力工作。在这样的背景下,我很高兴看到广告协会出版了劳伦斯·格林(2016)深思熟虑的白皮书的更新,题为“广告是否增加了消费者价格”,我想利用这个空间鼓励那些有兴趣的人阅读它。正如albion和Farris(1980)所概述的那样,关于某类产品的广告支出是降低了价格还是提高了价格的争论,往往是在反对广告在社会中的作用的背景下进行的。简而言之,广告=市场力量学派认为,大量的广告支出对一个行业有几个负面影响,包括更高的进入壁垒和高集中度,这有利于串通并使价格更高(ornstein 1977)。广告=信息学派提出了相反的效果,认为广告通过提供有关产品特征、价格和质量的信息来增加消费者的知识,从而降低搜索成本,促进竞争,从而降低行业集中度,导致价格降低(Mcauliffe 1987)。虽然讨论所有关于广告经济影响的先前研究超出了这篇社论的范围,但我自己先前对学术文献的回顾表明,大多数在20世纪90年代或之前进行的证据的权重倾向于这样一种观点,即虽然效应大小可能不大,但行业的总支出对价格施加了下行压力(taylor 2013)。尽管如此,一些研究或讨论继续做出相反的假设(rotfeld and Taylor 2009)。Green(2016)也提出了同样的观点,他说:“‘街上的人’和许多评论家甚至政策制定者的平淡结论——广告推高了价格,即使只是为了支付活动本身的成本——是毫无争议地被接受的。”Green(2016)认为,广告和价格之间的关系是微妙的。一方面,他指出,价格应该被视为广告能够影响的东西,并有可能通过强化一种产品值得付出更多的钱来带来更多的投资回报。另一方面,格林指出,广告还可以通过许多其他方式降低价格,比如促进品牌或零售商之间的竞争,促进规模经济和更大的创新。他还指出,广告有助于为媒体消费提供资金。关于上行压力和下行压力的论证在2006年的白皮书中得到了更充分的阐述,值得一读。https://doi.org/10.1080/02650487.2023.2183558
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Editorial: New Thoughts on Advertising’s Impact on Consumer Prices
after years of following the academic literature on advertising, i continued to believe that the economic effects of advertising are one of the most understudied topics. in general, continued study of issues associated with society is needed, but it seems that in this context, economic issues are not studied as frequently as several other societal issues that are also important, and likely make for easier reading (see e.g., Kordrostami and laczniak 2022; Wulf, et al., 2022; Hartmann et al, 2022) for examples of strong work on current social issues). against this backdrop, i was pleased to see that the advertising association has published an update to laurence Green’s (2016) thoughtful white paper titled ‘does advertising increase Consumer Prices’, and i would like to use this space to encourage those who are interested to read it. as outlined by albion and Farris (1980), the debate over whether advertising expenditures in a product category lower or raise prices has often been addressed in the context of opposing views of advertising role in society. in short, the advertising = Market Power school argues that large advertising expenditures have several negative impacts on an industry, including higher barriers to entry and high concentration ratios, which facilitates collusion and enables the charging of higher prices (ornstein 1977). the advertising = information school suggests opposite effects, arguing that advertising increases consumer knowledge by providing information about product features, prices and quality, thereby reducing search costs and facilitating competition in a way that decreased industry concentration and leads to lower prices (Mcauliffe 1987). While it is beyond the scope of this editorial to discuss all prior research on the economic effects of advertising, my own prior review of academic literature suggests that the weight of the evidence, conducted mostly in the 1990s or before favors the notion that while the effect size may not be large, aggregate and expenditures in an industry place downward pressure on prices (taylor 2013). in spite of this, some studies or discussions continue to make opposite assumptions (rotfeld and taylor 2009). Green (2016) makes the same observation, stating, ‘the prosaic conclusion of “the man on the street” and of many commentators and even policymakers – that advertising puts prices up, if only to pay for the cost of the activity itself—is accepted without argument’. Green (2016) argues that the relationship between advertising and price is nuanced. on one hand, he notes, price should be viewed as something that advertising is able to influence and potentially bring more return on investment by reinforcing that a product is worth paying more for. on the other hand, Green observes that there are many other ways that advertising can lower prices, by promoting competition among brands or retailers, and by contributing to economies of scale and greater innovation. He also notes that advertising helps fund media consumption. the arguments for both the upward and downward pressures is more fully fleshed out in the 2006 white paper and is worth the read. https://doi.org/10.1080/02650487.2023.2183558
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
13.90
自引率
19.40%
发文量
66
期刊介绍:
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信