锂离子电池和钠离子电池用生物质负极材料的技术经济对比和生命周期分析

IF 6.5 3区 材料科学 Q2 GREEN & SUSTAINABLE SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Federico Trotta, George Jing Wang, Zhenyu Guo, Zhen Xu, Maria Crespo Ribadeneyra, Heather Au, Jacqueline Sophie Edge, Maria Magdalena Titirici, Laura Lander
{"title":"锂离子电池和钠离子电池用生物质负极材料的技术经济对比和生命周期分析","authors":"Federico Trotta,&nbsp;George Jing Wang,&nbsp;Zhenyu Guo,&nbsp;Zhen Xu,&nbsp;Maria Crespo Ribadeneyra,&nbsp;Heather Au,&nbsp;Jacqueline Sophie Edge,&nbsp;Maria Magdalena Titirici,&nbsp;Laura Lander","doi":"10.1002/adsu.202200047","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The transition towards renewable energy and electric transportation depends on the development of efficient energy storage technologies. Lithium-ion batteries (LIBs) have gained increasing popularity despite rising prices and uncertainty around sourcing the component materials. This has recently prompted the development of alternative alkali batteries, such as sodium-ion batteries (SIBs). However, despite academic efforts focused on optimizing technical performance, few have studied the underlying economic and environmental impacts of alkali batteries. Therefore, this research examines the techno-economic and environmental performance of SIBs, using a “cradle-to-gate” life cycle assessment of cell manufacturing, comparing sodium-ion half cells (coin cells) with their lithium counterparts. An optimal charge capacity of 312.4 mAh g<sup>−1</sup> for sodium-ion half-cells has been achieved using glucose-derived hard-carbons, a 45% charge capacity increase compared to lithium. Sodium half-cells are shown to be 18% cheaper compared to lithium. From the life cycle analysis, it is found that sodium-ion half-cells show the lowest environmental footprint across all impact categories compared to lithium. It can be concluded that sodium is a credible alternative to LIBs with a preference for SIBs when environmental factors are jointly considered with techno-economics.</p>","PeriodicalId":7294,"journal":{"name":"Advanced Sustainable Systems","volume":"6 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Comparative Techno-Economic and Lifecycle Analysis of Biomass-Derived Anode Materials for Lithium- and Sodium-Ion Batteries\",\"authors\":\"Federico Trotta,&nbsp;George Jing Wang,&nbsp;Zhenyu Guo,&nbsp;Zhen Xu,&nbsp;Maria Crespo Ribadeneyra,&nbsp;Heather Au,&nbsp;Jacqueline Sophie Edge,&nbsp;Maria Magdalena Titirici,&nbsp;Laura Lander\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/adsu.202200047\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>The transition towards renewable energy and electric transportation depends on the development of efficient energy storage technologies. Lithium-ion batteries (LIBs) have gained increasing popularity despite rising prices and uncertainty around sourcing the component materials. This has recently prompted the development of alternative alkali batteries, such as sodium-ion batteries (SIBs). However, despite academic efforts focused on optimizing technical performance, few have studied the underlying economic and environmental impacts of alkali batteries. Therefore, this research examines the techno-economic and environmental performance of SIBs, using a “cradle-to-gate” life cycle assessment of cell manufacturing, comparing sodium-ion half cells (coin cells) with their lithium counterparts. An optimal charge capacity of 312.4 mAh g<sup>−1</sup> for sodium-ion half-cells has been achieved using glucose-derived hard-carbons, a 45% charge capacity increase compared to lithium. Sodium half-cells are shown to be 18% cheaper compared to lithium. From the life cycle analysis, it is found that sodium-ion half-cells show the lowest environmental footprint across all impact categories compared to lithium. It can be concluded that sodium is a credible alternative to LIBs with a preference for SIBs when environmental factors are jointly considered with techno-economics.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7294,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Advanced Sustainable Systems\",\"volume\":\"6 6\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-04-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Advanced Sustainable Systems\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"88\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/adsu.202200047\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"材料科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GREEN & SUSTAINABLE SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advanced Sustainable Systems","FirstCategoryId":"88","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/adsu.202200047","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GREEN & SUSTAINABLE SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

向可再生能源和电力运输的过渡取决于高效储能技术的发展。尽管锂离子电池(LIBs)的价格不断上涨,零部件材料的采购也存在不确定性,但它越来越受欢迎。这促使了替代碱电池的发展,例如钠离子电池(SIBs)。然而,尽管学术界致力于优化技术性能,但很少有人研究碱电池潜在的经济和环境影响。因此,本研究考察了sib的技术经济和环境性能,使用电池制造的“从摇篮到门”生命周期评估,比较钠离子半电池(硬币电池)和锂电池。使用葡萄糖衍生的硬碳,钠离子半电池的最佳充电容量为312.4 mAh g−1,与锂电池相比,充电容量增加了45%。钠半电池比锂电池便宜18%。从生命周期分析中发现,与锂电池相比,钠离子半电池在所有影响类别中表现出最低的环境足迹。综上所述,在综合考虑环境因素和技术经济因素的情况下,钠是lib的可靠替代品,且更倾向于SIBs。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

A Comparative Techno-Economic and Lifecycle Analysis of Biomass-Derived Anode Materials for Lithium- and Sodium-Ion Batteries

A Comparative Techno-Economic and Lifecycle Analysis of Biomass-Derived Anode Materials for Lithium- and Sodium-Ion Batteries

The transition towards renewable energy and electric transportation depends on the development of efficient energy storage technologies. Lithium-ion batteries (LIBs) have gained increasing popularity despite rising prices and uncertainty around sourcing the component materials. This has recently prompted the development of alternative alkali batteries, such as sodium-ion batteries (SIBs). However, despite academic efforts focused on optimizing technical performance, few have studied the underlying economic and environmental impacts of alkali batteries. Therefore, this research examines the techno-economic and environmental performance of SIBs, using a “cradle-to-gate” life cycle assessment of cell manufacturing, comparing sodium-ion half cells (coin cells) with their lithium counterparts. An optimal charge capacity of 312.4 mAh g−1 for sodium-ion half-cells has been achieved using glucose-derived hard-carbons, a 45% charge capacity increase compared to lithium. Sodium half-cells are shown to be 18% cheaper compared to lithium. From the life cycle analysis, it is found that sodium-ion half-cells show the lowest environmental footprint across all impact categories compared to lithium. It can be concluded that sodium is a credible alternative to LIBs with a preference for SIBs when environmental factors are jointly considered with techno-economics.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Advanced Sustainable Systems
Advanced Sustainable Systems Environmental Science-General Environmental Science
CiteScore
10.80
自引率
4.20%
发文量
186
期刊介绍: Advanced Sustainable Systems, a part of the esteemed Advanced portfolio, serves as an interdisciplinary sustainability science journal. It focuses on impactful research in the advancement of sustainable, efficient, and less wasteful systems and technologies. Aligned with the UN's Sustainable Development Goals, the journal bridges knowledge gaps between fundamental research, implementation, and policy-making. Covering diverse topics such as climate change, food sustainability, environmental science, renewable energy, water, urban development, and socio-economic challenges, it contributes to the understanding and promotion of sustainable systems.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信