跨性别医学:性别治疗的出现与实践

IF 1.4 Q2 ETHICS
Sarah Dahlen
{"title":"跨性别医学:性别治疗的出现与实践","authors":"Sarah Dahlen","doi":"10.1080/20502877.2021.2024022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"advances and applications of palliative care, contributes to non-medical suicides, and creates financial conflicts of interest, for example. Whatever one thinks about the question of ‘dignity,’ Kaczor argues that the extended burdens of euthanasia outweigh the possible benefits. The chapters on conscientious objection focus specifically on conscientious objection to abortion, though Kaczor’s arguments have broader application. He defends conscientious objection against several arguments. He points out, for example, that appeals to professional standards to deny conscientious objection are self-refuting, since professional standards of medical associations presently allow for conscientious objection. Furthermore, abortion is not self-evidently medically beneficial – abortion interrupts the healthy functioning of a uterus, abortion never benefits the fetus, and there is empirical evidence that abortions are more detrimental to women’s health than pregnancy. Kaczor also argues that there are costs to denying conscientious objection, especially to minority populations, since it would decrease general health care supply. Whether one thinks these costs are too great, however, will depend on what one thinks about the necessity of widespread access to abortion. He then argues that such considerations are ultimately beside the point. The relevant issue is not patient interests or the availability of services (since the decisions and rights of physicians often override such considerations), but whether an objector (or an objecting institution) should be forced to perform or participate (even by proxy) in what they believe is murder. Disputes in Bioethics works best as a way for those already acquainted with the basic issues of bioethics to get a sense of the contemporary literature on a variety of topics from the perspective of natural law theory. The essays are insightful and wide-ranging, with helpful discussions of concepts that are too often taken for granted. It is especially well-suited for upper-division undergraduates, graduate students, and researchers interested in bioethics.","PeriodicalId":43760,"journal":{"name":"New Bioethics-A Multidisciplinary Journal of Biotechnology and the Body","volume":"28 1","pages":"86 - 90"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Trans Medicine: The Emergence and Practice of Treating Gender\",\"authors\":\"Sarah Dahlen\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/20502877.2021.2024022\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"advances and applications of palliative care, contributes to non-medical suicides, and creates financial conflicts of interest, for example. Whatever one thinks about the question of ‘dignity,’ Kaczor argues that the extended burdens of euthanasia outweigh the possible benefits. The chapters on conscientious objection focus specifically on conscientious objection to abortion, though Kaczor’s arguments have broader application. He defends conscientious objection against several arguments. He points out, for example, that appeals to professional standards to deny conscientious objection are self-refuting, since professional standards of medical associations presently allow for conscientious objection. Furthermore, abortion is not self-evidently medically beneficial – abortion interrupts the healthy functioning of a uterus, abortion never benefits the fetus, and there is empirical evidence that abortions are more detrimental to women’s health than pregnancy. Kaczor also argues that there are costs to denying conscientious objection, especially to minority populations, since it would decrease general health care supply. Whether one thinks these costs are too great, however, will depend on what one thinks about the necessity of widespread access to abortion. He then argues that such considerations are ultimately beside the point. The relevant issue is not patient interests or the availability of services (since the decisions and rights of physicians often override such considerations), but whether an objector (or an objecting institution) should be forced to perform or participate (even by proxy) in what they believe is murder. Disputes in Bioethics works best as a way for those already acquainted with the basic issues of bioethics to get a sense of the contemporary literature on a variety of topics from the perspective of natural law theory. The essays are insightful and wide-ranging, with helpful discussions of concepts that are too often taken for granted. It is especially well-suited for upper-division undergraduates, graduate students, and researchers interested in bioethics.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43760,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"New Bioethics-A Multidisciplinary Journal of Biotechnology and the Body\",\"volume\":\"28 1\",\"pages\":\"86 - 90\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"New Bioethics-A Multidisciplinary Journal of Biotechnology and the Body\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/20502877.2021.2024022\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ETHICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"New Bioethics-A Multidisciplinary Journal of Biotechnology and the Body","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/20502877.2021.2024022","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ETHICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

例如,姑息治疗的进步和应用助长了非医疗性自杀,并造成了经济利益冲突。无论人们如何看待“尊严”问题,卡佐尔认为,安乐死带来的长期负担超过了可能带来的好处。关于良心反对的章节特别关注良心反对堕胎,尽管卡佐尔的论点有更广泛的应用。他为出于良心的反对辩护,反驳了几个论点。例如,他指出,呼吁以专业标准来否认出于良心拒服兵役是自相矛盾的,因为目前医学协会的专业标准允许出于良心拒服兵役。此外,堕胎在医学上并不是不言而喻的有益——堕胎会中断子宫的健康功能,堕胎对胎儿永远没有好处,而且有经验证据表明,堕胎对妇女健康的危害比怀孕更大。卡佐尔还认为,拒绝出于良心拒服兵役是有代价的,尤其是对少数族裔来说,因为这会减少一般医疗保健的供应。然而,人们是否认为这些成本太大,将取决于人们如何看待广泛堕胎的必要性。然后,他辩称,这些考虑最终都无关紧要。相关的问题不是病人的利益或服务的可获得性(因为医生的决定和权利往往凌驾于这些考虑之上),而是反对者(或反对的机构)是否应该被强迫执行或参与(甚至通过代理)他们认为是谋杀的行为。《生命伦理学之争》为那些已经熟悉生命伦理学基本问题的人提供了一种从自然法理论的角度来了解当代文献中各种主题的最佳途径。这些文章见解深刻,涉及面广,对经常被视为理所当然的概念进行了有益的讨论。它特别适合高年级本科生、研究生和对生物伦理学感兴趣的研究人员。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Trans Medicine: The Emergence and Practice of Treating Gender
advances and applications of palliative care, contributes to non-medical suicides, and creates financial conflicts of interest, for example. Whatever one thinks about the question of ‘dignity,’ Kaczor argues that the extended burdens of euthanasia outweigh the possible benefits. The chapters on conscientious objection focus specifically on conscientious objection to abortion, though Kaczor’s arguments have broader application. He defends conscientious objection against several arguments. He points out, for example, that appeals to professional standards to deny conscientious objection are self-refuting, since professional standards of medical associations presently allow for conscientious objection. Furthermore, abortion is not self-evidently medically beneficial – abortion interrupts the healthy functioning of a uterus, abortion never benefits the fetus, and there is empirical evidence that abortions are more detrimental to women’s health than pregnancy. Kaczor also argues that there are costs to denying conscientious objection, especially to minority populations, since it would decrease general health care supply. Whether one thinks these costs are too great, however, will depend on what one thinks about the necessity of widespread access to abortion. He then argues that such considerations are ultimately beside the point. The relevant issue is not patient interests or the availability of services (since the decisions and rights of physicians often override such considerations), but whether an objector (or an objecting institution) should be forced to perform or participate (even by proxy) in what they believe is murder. Disputes in Bioethics works best as a way for those already acquainted with the basic issues of bioethics to get a sense of the contemporary literature on a variety of topics from the perspective of natural law theory. The essays are insightful and wide-ranging, with helpful discussions of concepts that are too often taken for granted. It is especially well-suited for upper-division undergraduates, graduate students, and researchers interested in bioethics.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
16.70%
发文量
45
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信