学校干预的持续时间重要吗?使用动态方法促进质量和公平的有效性和可持续性

IF 2.8 3区教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH

School Effectiveness and School Improvement Pub Date : 2021-05-13 DOI:10.1080/09243453.2021.1923534

L. Kyriakides, P. Antoniou, A. Dimosthenous

{"title":"学校干预的持续时间重要吗?使用动态方法促进质量和公平的有效性和可持续性","authors":"L. Kyriakides, P. Antoniou, A. Dimosthenous","doi":"10.1080/09243453.2021.1923534","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This paper investigates the sustainability and the impact of offering the dynamic approach (DA) to schools for more than 1 year in improving student achievement in mathematics (quality) and reducing the impact of socioeconomic status (SES) on achievement (equity). A sample of 56 schools in socially disadvantaged areas in three countries (i.e., Cyprus, Greece, and Ireland) and their Grade 4 and 5 students (n = 2,844) participated in this study. Two experimental groups used DA to develop school improvement strategies and action plans. The first experimental group, which employed DA for only 1 school year, was more effective than the control group in promoting student achievement in mathematics and reducing the impact of SES on achievement both at the end of the 1st and 2nd implementation year. Schools which made use of DA for 2 years were found to be the most effective at the end of the 2nd year.","PeriodicalId":47698,"journal":{"name":"School Effectiveness and School Improvement","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/09243453.2021.1923534","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Does the duration of school interventions matter? The effectiveness and sustainability of using the dynamic approach to promote quality and equity\",\"authors\":\"L. Kyriakides, P. Antoniou, A. Dimosthenous\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/09243453.2021.1923534\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT This paper investigates the sustainability and the impact of offering the dynamic approach (DA) to schools for more than 1 year in improving student achievement in mathematics (quality) and reducing the impact of socioeconomic status (SES) on achievement (equity). A sample of 56 schools in socially disadvantaged areas in three countries (i.e., Cyprus, Greece, and Ireland) and their Grade 4 and 5 students (n = 2,844) participated in this study. Two experimental groups used DA to develop school improvement strategies and action plans. The first experimental group, which employed DA for only 1 school year, was more effective than the control group in promoting student achievement in mathematics and reducing the impact of SES on achievement both at the end of the 1st and 2nd implementation year. Schools which made use of DA for 2 years were found to be the most effective at the end of the 2nd year.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47698,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"School Effectiveness and School Improvement\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-05-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/09243453.2021.1923534\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"School Effectiveness and School Improvement\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/09243453.2021.1923534\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"School Effectiveness and School Improvement","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09243453.2021.1923534","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 4

摘要

摘要本文调查了向学校提供动态方法（DA）一年以上的可持续性和影响，以提高学生的数学成绩（质量），减少社会经济地位（SES）对成绩（公平）的影响。来自三个国家（即塞浦路斯、希腊和爱尔兰）社会弱势地区的56所学校及其四年级和五年级学生（n=2844）的样本参与了这项研究。两个实验小组使用DA来制定学校改进策略和行动计划。第一个实验组只使用了一学年的DA，在第一年和第二年实施结束时，在促进学生数学成绩和减少SES对成绩的影响方面比对照组更有效。使用DA两年的学校在第二年年底被发现是最有效的。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Does the duration of school interventions matter? The effectiveness and sustainability of using the dynamic approach to promote quality and equity

ABSTRACT This paper investigates the sustainability and the impact of offering the dynamic approach (DA) to schools for more than 1 year in improving student achievement in mathematics (quality) and reducing the impact of socioeconomic status (SES) on achievement (equity). A sample of 56 schools in socially disadvantaged areas in three countries (i.e., Cyprus, Greece, and Ireland) and their Grade 4 and 5 students (n = 2,844) participated in this study. Two experimental groups used DA to develop school improvement strategies and action plans. The first experimental group, which employed DA for only 1 school year, was more effective than the control group in promoting student achievement in mathematics and reducing the impact of SES on achievement both at the end of the 1st and 2nd implementation year. Schools which made use of DA for 2 years were found to be the most effective at the end of the 2nd year.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

School Effectiveness and School Improvement EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-

CiteScore

6.60

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： School Effectiveness and School Improvement presents information on educational effectiveness, practice and policy-making across primary, secondary and higher education. The Editors believe that the educational progress of all students, regardless of family background and economic status, is the key indicator of effectiveness and improvement in schools. The journal strives to explore this idea with manuscripts that cover a range of subjects within the area of educational effectiveness at the classroom, school or system level, including, but not limited to: •Effective pedagogy •Classroom climate •School ethos and leadership •School improvement and reform programmes •Systemwide policy and reform