总编辑寄语

F. Waldenberger
{"title":"总编辑寄语","authors":"F. Waldenberger","doi":"10.1080/18692729.2023.2175424","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Dear reader, Mega-events draw international attention. They also provide a prism or lens through which social, political and economic conditions and structures of the host nation become diffracted and more clearly visible. The Tokyo 2020–21 Olympic and Paralympic Games were no exception. Asked about what we associate with the games today, most of us will probably mention the COVID-19 pandemic. The games fell twice victim to the pandemic, first in 2020, when the mega-event had to be postponed, and second in 2021, when it was finally held without on-site spectators. For people living in Tokyo, it was a surreal experience. The games were shielded from them. They were turned into a pure media event. The pandemic changed Japan’s early enthusiasm for the games into opposition. Had there been a referendum, Tokyo 2020 might have been called off. But in the end, the Japanese and Tokyo metropolitan governments had to surrender to their contractual obligations dictated by the IOC. The research papers collected in this special issue look back from very different, but mostly critical angles: the planning phase of the games in the context of Tokyo’s urban development strategy; the rituals surrounding the games, the narratives created by them and their impact on the how the event will be remembered; the political polarization created by holding the event as seen in online communication channels; anti-Olympic activism in the context of Japan’s recent history of political protests; the ambiguous attitudes towards both the 1964 and the 2020 games as seen through the manga Akira and its creator Ōtomo Katsuhiro. Two articles attempt to explicitly evaluate the games. The first assesses success and failure by looking at various evaluation criteria and by examining different stakeholder groups. The second paper portrays the event as a manifestation of “capitalist realism” driven by financial interests. The research papers are complemented by two short commentaries, which point to various negative news surrounding the games including corruption charges. Again, this issue also contains book reviews. The topics of the four reviewed publications cover Japan’s earthquake resilience, coral reef conservation in Okinawa, and regional revitalization through urban-rural migration, entrepreneurship and internationalization. Let me finish with a positive note on the development of our journal. The journal continues to be accessible through more than 2,600 institutions via subscriptions and","PeriodicalId":37204,"journal":{"name":"Contemporary Japan","volume":"35 1","pages":"1 - 2"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Message from the editor-in-chief\",\"authors\":\"F. Waldenberger\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/18692729.2023.2175424\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Dear reader, Mega-events draw international attention. They also provide a prism or lens through which social, political and economic conditions and structures of the host nation become diffracted and more clearly visible. The Tokyo 2020–21 Olympic and Paralympic Games were no exception. Asked about what we associate with the games today, most of us will probably mention the COVID-19 pandemic. The games fell twice victim to the pandemic, first in 2020, when the mega-event had to be postponed, and second in 2021, when it was finally held without on-site spectators. For people living in Tokyo, it was a surreal experience. The games were shielded from them. They were turned into a pure media event. The pandemic changed Japan’s early enthusiasm for the games into opposition. Had there been a referendum, Tokyo 2020 might have been called off. But in the end, the Japanese and Tokyo metropolitan governments had to surrender to their contractual obligations dictated by the IOC. The research papers collected in this special issue look back from very different, but mostly critical angles: the planning phase of the games in the context of Tokyo’s urban development strategy; the rituals surrounding the games, the narratives created by them and their impact on the how the event will be remembered; the political polarization created by holding the event as seen in online communication channels; anti-Olympic activism in the context of Japan’s recent history of political protests; the ambiguous attitudes towards both the 1964 and the 2020 games as seen through the manga Akira and its creator Ōtomo Katsuhiro. Two articles attempt to explicitly evaluate the games. The first assesses success and failure by looking at various evaluation criteria and by examining different stakeholder groups. The second paper portrays the event as a manifestation of “capitalist realism” driven by financial interests. The research papers are complemented by two short commentaries, which point to various negative news surrounding the games including corruption charges. Again, this issue also contains book reviews. The topics of the four reviewed publications cover Japan’s earthquake resilience, coral reef conservation in Okinawa, and regional revitalization through urban-rural migration, entrepreneurship and internationalization. Let me finish with a positive note on the development of our journal. The journal continues to be accessible through more than 2,600 institutions via subscriptions and\",\"PeriodicalId\":37204,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Contemporary Japan\",\"volume\":\"35 1\",\"pages\":\"1 - 2\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Contemporary Japan\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/18692729.2023.2175424\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contemporary Japan","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/18692729.2023.2175424","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

亲爱的读者,大型活动吸引了国际关注。它们还提供了一个棱镜或透镜,通过这个棱镜,东道国的社会、政治和经济状况和结构变得更加清晰可见。2020-21年东京奥运会和残奥会也不例外。当被问及我们今天会联想到什么时,我们大多数人可能会提到COVID-19大流行。奥运会两次成为疫情的受害者,第一次是在2020年,当时这项大型赛事不得不推迟,第二次是在2021年,当时它最终在没有现场观众的情况下举行。对于住在东京的人来说,这是一种超现实的体验。游戏被屏蔽在他们的视线之外。它们变成了纯粹的媒体事件。疫情让日本人从最初对奥运会的热情变成了反对。如果举行全民公投,2020年东京奥运会可能会取消。但最终,日本和东京都政府不得不屈服于国际奥委会规定的合同义务。本期特刊收集的研究论文从非常不同的角度回顾,但大多是关键的角度:在东京城市发展战略的背景下,奥运会的规划阶段;围绕着奥运会的仪式、它们所创造的故事以及它们对人们如何记住奥运会的影响;从网络传播渠道来看,举办活动所造成的政治两极分化;在日本近期政治抗议历史背景下的反奥运激进主义;通过漫画《明》及其创作者Ōtomo胜宏,人们对1964年奥运会和2020年奥运会的暧昧态度。有两篇文章试图明确地评价这些游戏。第一种方法通过查看各种评估标准和检查不同的利益相关者群体来评估成功和失败。第二篇论文将这一事件描述为由金融利益驱动的“资本主义现实主义”的表现。研究报告附有两篇简短的评论,其中指出了围绕奥运会的各种负面新闻,包括腐败指控。同样,这一期也包含书评。经过审查的四份出版物的主题包括日本的地震复原力、冲绳的珊瑚礁保护以及通过城乡移民、企业家精神和国际化实现区域振兴。最后,让我对我们杂志的发展做一个积极的评价。2600多家机构仍可通过订阅和订阅方式获取该期刊
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Message from the editor-in-chief
Dear reader, Mega-events draw international attention. They also provide a prism or lens through which social, political and economic conditions and structures of the host nation become diffracted and more clearly visible. The Tokyo 2020–21 Olympic and Paralympic Games were no exception. Asked about what we associate with the games today, most of us will probably mention the COVID-19 pandemic. The games fell twice victim to the pandemic, first in 2020, when the mega-event had to be postponed, and second in 2021, when it was finally held without on-site spectators. For people living in Tokyo, it was a surreal experience. The games were shielded from them. They were turned into a pure media event. The pandemic changed Japan’s early enthusiasm for the games into opposition. Had there been a referendum, Tokyo 2020 might have been called off. But in the end, the Japanese and Tokyo metropolitan governments had to surrender to their contractual obligations dictated by the IOC. The research papers collected in this special issue look back from very different, but mostly critical angles: the planning phase of the games in the context of Tokyo’s urban development strategy; the rituals surrounding the games, the narratives created by them and their impact on the how the event will be remembered; the political polarization created by holding the event as seen in online communication channels; anti-Olympic activism in the context of Japan’s recent history of political protests; the ambiguous attitudes towards both the 1964 and the 2020 games as seen through the manga Akira and its creator Ōtomo Katsuhiro. Two articles attempt to explicitly evaluate the games. The first assesses success and failure by looking at various evaluation criteria and by examining different stakeholder groups. The second paper portrays the event as a manifestation of “capitalist realism” driven by financial interests. The research papers are complemented by two short commentaries, which point to various negative news surrounding the games including corruption charges. Again, this issue also contains book reviews. The topics of the four reviewed publications cover Japan’s earthquake resilience, coral reef conservation in Okinawa, and regional revitalization through urban-rural migration, entrepreneurship and internationalization. Let me finish with a positive note on the development of our journal. The journal continues to be accessible through more than 2,600 institutions via subscriptions and
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Contemporary Japan
Contemporary Japan Arts and Humanities-History
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信