走向水电共益:基于LCA和DEA的生态效益评价

IF 9.8 1区 社会学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
Xincong Liu , Yaqin Jiang , Xiangyu Zheng , Wenyue Hou , Xiehang Chen , Shijiang Xiao , Xiaohong Zhang , Shihuai Deng , Jingjing Hao , Huawei Luo , Hengyu Pan
{"title":"走向水电共益:基于LCA和DEA的生态效益评价","authors":"Xincong Liu ,&nbsp;Yaqin Jiang ,&nbsp;Xiangyu Zheng ,&nbsp;Wenyue Hou ,&nbsp;Xiehang Chen ,&nbsp;Shijiang Xiao ,&nbsp;Xiaohong Zhang ,&nbsp;Shihuai Deng ,&nbsp;Jingjing Hao ,&nbsp;Huawei Luo ,&nbsp;Hengyu Pan","doi":"10.1016/j.eiar.2023.107208","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>China is ambitious to develop renewable energy for the commitment of carbon neutralization in 2060. Hydropower has been regarded as one important solution to mitigate greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions by replacing fossil fuels, while the related ecological impacts hinder its sustainable development. This study proposes a framework to integrate life cycle analysis<span><span> and ecosystem service assessment by evaluating 43 case hydropower plants (HPs) in China. Combining with the super slacks-based measurement model, the ecological efficiency of HPs is evaluated to provide optimizing pathways. The results show most </span>environmental impacts<span><span> of the whole HP life cycle are from the preparation and construction stages of HPs. The ecosystem service losses (ESLs) are mainly from the losses of biodiversity and water supply. The first cascade HP generally has a smaller ecological efficiency than downstream HPs. Furthermore, the current pricing structure of the studied HPs does not adequately account for the associated ESLs. It suggests that consumers in transmission destinations should bear a higher cost to address the ecological impacts of HP operations. Consequently, there is a need to revise the pricing mechanisms to reflect and internalize the ecological costs more accurately. Finally, based on the results, policy implications for achieving “co-benefit” of </span>hydropower development and ecosystem protection were raised: (a) conducting the comprehensive and systematic evaluation of HPs including LCA and ESL assessment before HP planning; (b) ensuring the connectivity of natural flow and the preservation of fish areas; (c) revising the pricing mechanisms of hydropower based on the fair price.</span></span></p></div>","PeriodicalId":309,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Impact Assessment Review","volume":"102 ","pages":"Article 107208"},"PeriodicalIF":9.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Moving towards co-benefits of hydropower: Ecological efficiency evaluation based on LCA and DEA\",\"authors\":\"Xincong Liu ,&nbsp;Yaqin Jiang ,&nbsp;Xiangyu Zheng ,&nbsp;Wenyue Hou ,&nbsp;Xiehang Chen ,&nbsp;Shijiang Xiao ,&nbsp;Xiaohong Zhang ,&nbsp;Shihuai Deng ,&nbsp;Jingjing Hao ,&nbsp;Huawei Luo ,&nbsp;Hengyu Pan\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.eiar.2023.107208\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>China is ambitious to develop renewable energy for the commitment of carbon neutralization in 2060. Hydropower has been regarded as one important solution to mitigate greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions by replacing fossil fuels, while the related ecological impacts hinder its sustainable development. This study proposes a framework to integrate life cycle analysis<span><span> and ecosystem service assessment by evaluating 43 case hydropower plants (HPs) in China. Combining with the super slacks-based measurement model, the ecological efficiency of HPs is evaluated to provide optimizing pathways. The results show most </span>environmental impacts<span><span> of the whole HP life cycle are from the preparation and construction stages of HPs. The ecosystem service losses (ESLs) are mainly from the losses of biodiversity and water supply. The first cascade HP generally has a smaller ecological efficiency than downstream HPs. Furthermore, the current pricing structure of the studied HPs does not adequately account for the associated ESLs. It suggests that consumers in transmission destinations should bear a higher cost to address the ecological impacts of HP operations. Consequently, there is a need to revise the pricing mechanisms to reflect and internalize the ecological costs more accurately. Finally, based on the results, policy implications for achieving “co-benefit” of </span>hydropower development and ecosystem protection were raised: (a) conducting the comprehensive and systematic evaluation of HPs including LCA and ESL assessment before HP planning; (b) ensuring the connectivity of natural flow and the preservation of fish areas; (c) revising the pricing mechanisms of hydropower based on the fair price.</span></span></p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":309,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Environmental Impact Assessment Review\",\"volume\":\"102 \",\"pages\":\"Article 107208\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Environmental Impact Assessment Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0195925523001749\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Impact Assessment Review","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0195925523001749","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

中国雄心勃勃地发展可再生能源,以实现到2060年实现碳中和的承诺。水电已被视为替代化石燃料减少温室气体排放的重要解决方案之一,但相关的生态影响阻碍了水电的可持续发展。本研究通过对中国43座水电站的生态系统服务评价,提出了一个生命周期分析与生态系统服务评价相结合的框架。结合基于超松弛测度模型,评价了hp的生态效率,给出了优化路径。结果表明,HP全生命周期的环境影响主要发生在HP的制备和构建阶段。生态系统服务功能损失主要来源于生物多样性的丧失和水源的流失。第一梯级HP的生态效率一般低于下游HP。此外,所研究的hp的当前定价结构并没有充分考虑相关的esl。这表明,输电目的地的消费者应该承担更高的成本,以解决惠普运营的生态影响。因此,有必要修改定价机制,以更准确地反映和内部化生态成本。最后,在此基础上提出了实现水电开发与生态系统保护“协同效益”的政策启示:(a)在水电规划前对水电项目进行全面系统的评价,包括LCA和ESL评价;(b)确保自然水流的连通性和保存鱼类区;(三)以公平价格为基础,修订水电定价机制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Moving towards co-benefits of hydropower: Ecological efficiency evaluation based on LCA and DEA

China is ambitious to develop renewable energy for the commitment of carbon neutralization in 2060. Hydropower has been regarded as one important solution to mitigate greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions by replacing fossil fuels, while the related ecological impacts hinder its sustainable development. This study proposes a framework to integrate life cycle analysis and ecosystem service assessment by evaluating 43 case hydropower plants (HPs) in China. Combining with the super slacks-based measurement model, the ecological efficiency of HPs is evaluated to provide optimizing pathways. The results show most environmental impacts of the whole HP life cycle are from the preparation and construction stages of HPs. The ecosystem service losses (ESLs) are mainly from the losses of biodiversity and water supply. The first cascade HP generally has a smaller ecological efficiency than downstream HPs. Furthermore, the current pricing structure of the studied HPs does not adequately account for the associated ESLs. It suggests that consumers in transmission destinations should bear a higher cost to address the ecological impacts of HP operations. Consequently, there is a need to revise the pricing mechanisms to reflect and internalize the ecological costs more accurately. Finally, based on the results, policy implications for achieving “co-benefit” of hydropower development and ecosystem protection were raised: (a) conducting the comprehensive and systematic evaluation of HPs including LCA and ESL assessment before HP planning; (b) ensuring the connectivity of natural flow and the preservation of fish areas; (c) revising the pricing mechanisms of hydropower based on the fair price.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
12.60
自引率
10.10%
发文量
200
审稿时长
33 days
期刊介绍: Environmental Impact Assessment Review is an interdisciplinary journal that serves a global audience of practitioners, policymakers, and academics involved in assessing the environmental impact of policies, projects, processes, and products. The journal focuses on innovative theory and practice in environmental impact assessment (EIA). Papers are expected to present innovative ideas, be topical, and coherent. The journal emphasizes concepts, methods, techniques, approaches, and systems related to EIA theory and practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信