流行病时代情感探究的僵局

L. Smithers, Heidi Fischer, Faith Watrous
{"title":"流行病时代情感探究的僵局","authors":"L. Smithers, Heidi Fischer, Faith Watrous","doi":"10.1177/19408447221097634","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper puzzles through the doubled impasses of our affective inquiry into learning communities in a college setting. In so doing, we take on the incommensurabilities of our field site and post qualitative inquiry, providing an example of critical qualitative inquiry where theory and practice are made to work together at their limits, both compromising with each other, neither subordinated to the other. Affective inquiry, an instantiation of concept as method inquiry, itself was a search for the impasses of learning community life. When our observations were moved to Zoom as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic, we were faced with another impasse: how to attune to affect in this new and thoroughly datafied space? We open by theorizing affective inquiry and our doubled impasse, and we then explore three locations of these impasses in our fieldwork. We close with a reaffirmation of relentless experimentation.","PeriodicalId":90874,"journal":{"name":"International review of qualitative research : IRQR","volume":"16 1","pages":"128 - 145"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impasses of Affective Inquiry in Pandemic Times\",\"authors\":\"L. Smithers, Heidi Fischer, Faith Watrous\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/19408447221097634\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper puzzles through the doubled impasses of our affective inquiry into learning communities in a college setting. In so doing, we take on the incommensurabilities of our field site and post qualitative inquiry, providing an example of critical qualitative inquiry where theory and practice are made to work together at their limits, both compromising with each other, neither subordinated to the other. Affective inquiry, an instantiation of concept as method inquiry, itself was a search for the impasses of learning community life. When our observations were moved to Zoom as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic, we were faced with another impasse: how to attune to affect in this new and thoroughly datafied space? We open by theorizing affective inquiry and our doubled impasse, and we then explore three locations of these impasses in our fieldwork. We close with a reaffirmation of relentless experimentation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":90874,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International review of qualitative research : IRQR\",\"volume\":\"16 1\",\"pages\":\"128 - 145\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-05-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International review of qualitative research : IRQR\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/19408447221097634\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International review of qualitative research : IRQR","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/19408447221097634","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文试图通过对大学环境下的学习共同体进行情感探究的双重困境来解决问题。在这样做的过程中,我们承担了我们的现场和后定性调查的不可通约性,提供了一个批判性定性调查的例子,其中理论和实践在其极限下共同工作,两者相互妥协,两者都不隶属于另一方。情感探究是概念作为方法探究的一个实例,它本身就是对学习共同体生活僵局的探索。当我们的观察结果因COVID-19大流行而转移到Zoom时,我们面临着另一个僵局:如何在这个全新的、完全数据化的空间中进行调整以产生影响?我们首先将情感探究和我们的双重僵局理论化,然后在我们的田野调查中探索这些僵局的三个位置。最后,我们重申了不懈的实验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Impasses of Affective Inquiry in Pandemic Times
This paper puzzles through the doubled impasses of our affective inquiry into learning communities in a college setting. In so doing, we take on the incommensurabilities of our field site and post qualitative inquiry, providing an example of critical qualitative inquiry where theory and practice are made to work together at their limits, both compromising with each other, neither subordinated to the other. Affective inquiry, an instantiation of concept as method inquiry, itself was a search for the impasses of learning community life. When our observations were moved to Zoom as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic, we were faced with another impasse: how to attune to affect in this new and thoroughly datafied space? We open by theorizing affective inquiry and our doubled impasse, and we then explore three locations of these impasses in our fieldwork. We close with a reaffirmation of relentless experimentation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信