“太不成熟,不适合从政?”2011 - 2020年,俄罗斯青少年抗议者眼中的政治机构

IF 1.6 3区 社会学 Q2 SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY
S. Erpyleva
{"title":"“太不成熟,不适合从政?”2011 - 2020年,俄罗斯青少年抗议者眼中的政治机构","authors":"S. Erpyleva","doi":"10.1177/09075682231182111","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper bridges empirical research on children’s political participation and theoretical debates on the concept of agency in Childhood studies. It takes insights from the internal criticism of the essentialist conception of agency in Childhood studies and develops it further. Based on an analysis of in-depth interviews with adolescent participants of anti-regime protests in two periods of recent Russian history—i.e., 2011–13 and 2017–20—it compares how these two cohorts of politically active children constructed their political agency. It suggests that the authoritarian and depoliticized context of Russian society affects the construction of agency by child activists in ways we do not see in Western democracies. It thus challenges the main concepts of agency in Childhood studies, including the “critical” ones.","PeriodicalId":47764,"journal":{"name":"Childhood-A Global Journal of Child Research","volume":"30 1","pages":"219 - 234"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"“Too immature for politics?” Political agency in the eyes of Russian adolescent protesters, 2011–20\",\"authors\":\"S. Erpyleva\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/09075682231182111\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper bridges empirical research on children’s political participation and theoretical debates on the concept of agency in Childhood studies. It takes insights from the internal criticism of the essentialist conception of agency in Childhood studies and develops it further. Based on an analysis of in-depth interviews with adolescent participants of anti-regime protests in two periods of recent Russian history—i.e., 2011–13 and 2017–20—it compares how these two cohorts of politically active children constructed their political agency. It suggests that the authoritarian and depoliticized context of Russian society affects the construction of agency by child activists in ways we do not see in Western democracies. It thus challenges the main concepts of agency in Childhood studies, including the “critical” ones.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47764,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Childhood-A Global Journal of Child Research\",\"volume\":\"30 1\",\"pages\":\"219 - 234\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Childhood-A Global Journal of Child Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/09075682231182111\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Childhood-A Global Journal of Child Research","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/09075682231182111","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文将儿童政治参与的实证研究与儿童研究中代理概念的理论争论结合起来。它借鉴了对儿童研究本质主义能动性概念的内部批评,并对其进行了进一步的发展。基于对俄罗斯近代史上两个时期反政权抗议青少年参与者的深度访谈分析——即:它比较了这两组政治活跃儿童如何构建他们的政治机构。它表明,俄罗斯社会的威权主义和非政治化背景,以我们在西方民主国家看不到的方式,影响着儿童活动家的机构建构。因此,它挑战了儿童研究中的主体概念,包括“批判性”概念。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
“Too immature for politics?” Political agency in the eyes of Russian adolescent protesters, 2011–20
This paper bridges empirical research on children’s political participation and theoretical debates on the concept of agency in Childhood studies. It takes insights from the internal criticism of the essentialist conception of agency in Childhood studies and develops it further. Based on an analysis of in-depth interviews with adolescent participants of anti-regime protests in two periods of recent Russian history—i.e., 2011–13 and 2017–20—it compares how these two cohorts of politically active children constructed their political agency. It suggests that the authoritarian and depoliticized context of Russian society affects the construction of agency by child activists in ways we do not see in Western democracies. It thus challenges the main concepts of agency in Childhood studies, including the “critical” ones.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Childhood-A Global Journal of Child Research
Childhood-A Global Journal of Child Research SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
15.80%
发文量
43
期刊介绍: Childhood is a major international peer reviewed journal and a forum for research relating to children in global society that spans divisions between geographical regions, disciplines, and social and cultural contexts. Childhood publishes theoretical and empirical articles, reviews and scholarly comments on children"s social relations and culture, with an emphasis on their rights and generational position in society.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信