社交商务领域接受与使用研究综述

Q3 Computer Science
Nasibeh Pouti, M. Taghavifard, M. Taghva, M. Fathian
{"title":"社交商务领域接受与使用研究综述","authors":"Nasibeh Pouti, M. Taghavifard, M. Taghva, M. Fathian","doi":"10.7903/IJECS.1896","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Different studies have considered social commerce as a new paradigm in the field of business and commerce for about a decade and addressed the identification of factors affecting its acceptance. The present study sought to thoroughly review previous research related to the adoption of social commerce. For this purpose, a systematic review of the literature was used with primary and secondary search strategies by utilizing two approaches. First, two hundred sources were reviewed using criteria such as business transactions, social commerce approach, the applied social media, customer engagement cycle, value creation and value co-creation methods, as well as the type of business based on product or service offerings, the innovation space, the employed fundamental theories, and the research method of the studies. Then, the trends and findings from the observed results in the quantitative approach were analysed, followed by distinguishing three generations of social commerce acceptance studies that were conducted over this decade. The results revealed that trust, perceived usefulness, and socialization skills have the greatest impact on social commerce acceptance. Among the various platforms, social networks and microblogs, as well as some e-commerce sites equipped with social constructs were the most used cases in social commerce. The applied theories and models in acceptance studies varied extensively while the technology acceptance model, and the theories related to the planned behaviour, rational action, and social support were frequently used. In addition, different studies focused on user behaviour and the cognitive space of innovation and business-to-customer transactions, which mainly evaluated the sale of goods through social commerce while the scope of service provision was less prominent. Regarding the research method, most of the studies were non-experimental, descriptive, and survey and the main sources of the dissemination of social commerce acceptance research were journal articles.","PeriodicalId":38305,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Electronic Commerce Studies","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Comprehensive Literature Review of Acceptance and Usage Studies in the Social Commerce Field\",\"authors\":\"Nasibeh Pouti, M. Taghavifard, M. Taghva, M. Fathian\",\"doi\":\"10.7903/IJECS.1896\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Different studies have considered social commerce as a new paradigm in the field of business and commerce for about a decade and addressed the identification of factors affecting its acceptance. The present study sought to thoroughly review previous research related to the adoption of social commerce. For this purpose, a systematic review of the literature was used with primary and secondary search strategies by utilizing two approaches. First, two hundred sources were reviewed using criteria such as business transactions, social commerce approach, the applied social media, customer engagement cycle, value creation and value co-creation methods, as well as the type of business based on product or service offerings, the innovation space, the employed fundamental theories, and the research method of the studies. Then, the trends and findings from the observed results in the quantitative approach were analysed, followed by distinguishing three generations of social commerce acceptance studies that were conducted over this decade. The results revealed that trust, perceived usefulness, and socialization skills have the greatest impact on social commerce acceptance. Among the various platforms, social networks and microblogs, as well as some e-commerce sites equipped with social constructs were the most used cases in social commerce. The applied theories and models in acceptance studies varied extensively while the technology acceptance model, and the theories related to the planned behaviour, rational action, and social support were frequently used. In addition, different studies focused on user behaviour and the cognitive space of innovation and business-to-customer transactions, which mainly evaluated the sale of goods through social commerce while the scope of service provision was less prominent. Regarding the research method, most of the studies were non-experimental, descriptive, and survey and the main sources of the dissemination of social commerce acceptance research were journal articles.\",\"PeriodicalId\":38305,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Electronic Commerce Studies\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-12-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Electronic Commerce Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7903/IJECS.1896\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Computer Science\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Electronic Commerce Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7903/IJECS.1896","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Computer Science","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

近十年来,不同的研究将社会商业视为商业和商业领域的一种新范式,并探讨了影响其接受度的因素。本研究试图彻底回顾以往与采用社会商业有关的研究。为此,通过使用两种方法,对文献进行了系统综述,并采用了主要和次要搜索策略。首先,使用商业交易、社交商务方法、应用社交媒体、客户参与周期、价值创造和价值共创方法等标准,以及基于产品或服务的企业类型、创新空间、所采用的基本理论和研究方法,对200个来源进行了审查。然后,分析了定量方法中观察到的结果的趋势和发现,然后区分了这十年中进行的三代社会商业接受研究。结果表明,信任、感知有用性和社交技能对社会商业接受度的影响最大。在各种平台中,社交网络和微博,以及一些配备了社交结构的电子商务网站是社交商务中使用最多的案例。接受研究中的应用理论和模型多种多样,而技术接受模型以及与计划行为、理性行动和社会支持相关的理论被频繁使用。此外,不同的研究侧重于用户行为以及创新和企业与客户交易的认知空间,主要评估通过社交商务销售商品,而服务提供的范围则不那么突出。在研究方法方面,大多数研究都是非实验性的、描述性的和调查性的,社会商业接受研究传播的主要来源是期刊文章。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Comprehensive Literature Review of Acceptance and Usage Studies in the Social Commerce Field
Different studies have considered social commerce as a new paradigm in the field of business and commerce for about a decade and addressed the identification of factors affecting its acceptance. The present study sought to thoroughly review previous research related to the adoption of social commerce. For this purpose, a systematic review of the literature was used with primary and secondary search strategies by utilizing two approaches. First, two hundred sources were reviewed using criteria such as business transactions, social commerce approach, the applied social media, customer engagement cycle, value creation and value co-creation methods, as well as the type of business based on product or service offerings, the innovation space, the employed fundamental theories, and the research method of the studies. Then, the trends and findings from the observed results in the quantitative approach were analysed, followed by distinguishing three generations of social commerce acceptance studies that were conducted over this decade. The results revealed that trust, perceived usefulness, and socialization skills have the greatest impact on social commerce acceptance. Among the various platforms, social networks and microblogs, as well as some e-commerce sites equipped with social constructs were the most used cases in social commerce. The applied theories and models in acceptance studies varied extensively while the technology acceptance model, and the theories related to the planned behaviour, rational action, and social support were frequently used. In addition, different studies focused on user behaviour and the cognitive space of innovation and business-to-customer transactions, which mainly evaluated the sale of goods through social commerce while the scope of service provision was less prominent. Regarding the research method, most of the studies were non-experimental, descriptive, and survey and the main sources of the dissemination of social commerce acceptance research were journal articles.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Electronic Commerce Studies
International Journal of Electronic Commerce Studies Computer Science-Computer Science Applications
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The IJECS is a double-blind referred academic journal for all fields of Electronic Commerce. To serve as an international platform, the IJECS encourages manuscript submissions from authors all around the world. As a multi-discipline journal, The IJECS welcome both technology oriented and business oriented electronic commerce research articles. The purpose of the International Journal of Electronic Commerce Studies is to promote electronic commerce research and provide worldwide scholars a place to publish their innovative work in electronic commerce. To be published in the journal, the manuscript must make strong empirical, theoretical, or practical contributions and highlight the significance of the contributions to the electronic commerce field. Thus, preference is given to submissions that test, extend, or build strong theoretical frameworks for electronic commerce theory, electronic commerce system development, and electronic commerce practice. The journal is not tied to any particular national context; the geographic distribution of authors publishing in the journal came from countries around the world. Articles introducing cases of innovative applications in electronic commerce around the world are also published in the journal. The journal provides scholars opportunities to realize the electronic commerce research and development around the world. Articles in the International Journal of Electronic Commerce Studies will include, but are not limited to the following areas.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信