代理话语与数学教学中的等级再现

IF 2.3 1区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL
Nicole Louie
{"title":"代理话语与数学教学中的等级再现","authors":"Nicole Louie","doi":"10.1080/07370008.2019.1677664","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract There is widespread agreement that students should be supported to experience intellectual agency. However, “traditional,” teacher-centered forms of instruction tend to limit students’ opportunities to exercise agency, and many studies have shown that such instruction is highly resistant to change, particularly in mathematics. This article examines how teachers at five elementary schools used discourses emphasizing student agency to make sense of their mathematics instruction, in the context of a professional development program that highlighted fostering agency as a means for advancing equity. The author finds that although teachers took up agency-focused discourse in meaningful ways, they simultaneously perpetuated the assumption that some children are smarter and more capable than others. This illustrates ideological dimensions of instructional change and stability at the level of teachers’ everyday work. Approaches to student-centered reforms that do not attend to these dimensions may fall short of their aspirations to serve “all students” well.","PeriodicalId":47945,"journal":{"name":"Cognition and Instruction","volume":"38 1","pages":"1 - 26"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/07370008.2019.1677664","citationCount":"28","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Agency Discourse and the Reproduction of Hierarchy in Mathematics Instruction\",\"authors\":\"Nicole Louie\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/07370008.2019.1677664\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract There is widespread agreement that students should be supported to experience intellectual agency. However, “traditional,” teacher-centered forms of instruction tend to limit students’ opportunities to exercise agency, and many studies have shown that such instruction is highly resistant to change, particularly in mathematics. This article examines how teachers at five elementary schools used discourses emphasizing student agency to make sense of their mathematics instruction, in the context of a professional development program that highlighted fostering agency as a means for advancing equity. The author finds that although teachers took up agency-focused discourse in meaningful ways, they simultaneously perpetuated the assumption that some children are smarter and more capable than others. This illustrates ideological dimensions of instructional change and stability at the level of teachers’ everyday work. Approaches to student-centered reforms that do not attend to these dimensions may fall short of their aspirations to serve “all students” well.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47945,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cognition and Instruction\",\"volume\":\"38 1\",\"pages\":\"1 - 26\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-01-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/07370008.2019.1677664\",\"citationCount\":\"28\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cognition and Instruction\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/07370008.2019.1677664\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cognition and Instruction","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/07370008.2019.1677664","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 28

摘要

摘要人们普遍认为,应该支持学生体验智力能动性。然而,“传统的”以教师为中心的教学形式往往会限制学生行使代理权的机会,许多研究表明,这种教学非常抗拒改变,尤其是在数学方面。本文考察了五所小学的教师如何在专业发展计划的背景下,利用强调学生代理的话语来理解他们的数学教学,该计划强调培养代理是促进公平的一种手段。作者发现,尽管教师们以有意义的方式进行了以机构为中心的讨论,但他们同时也延续了这样一种假设,即一些孩子比其他孩子更聪明、更有能力。这说明了教师日常工作层面的教学变革和稳定的意识形态层面。不关注这些方面的以学生为中心的改革方法可能达不到他们为“所有学生”提供良好服务的愿望。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Agency Discourse and the Reproduction of Hierarchy in Mathematics Instruction
Abstract There is widespread agreement that students should be supported to experience intellectual agency. However, “traditional,” teacher-centered forms of instruction tend to limit students’ opportunities to exercise agency, and many studies have shown that such instruction is highly resistant to change, particularly in mathematics. This article examines how teachers at five elementary schools used discourses emphasizing student agency to make sense of their mathematics instruction, in the context of a professional development program that highlighted fostering agency as a means for advancing equity. The author finds that although teachers took up agency-focused discourse in meaningful ways, they simultaneously perpetuated the assumption that some children are smarter and more capable than others. This illustrates ideological dimensions of instructional change and stability at the level of teachers’ everyday work. Approaches to student-centered reforms that do not attend to these dimensions may fall short of their aspirations to serve “all students” well.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.90
自引率
12.10%
发文量
22
期刊介绍: Among education journals, Cognition and Instruction"s distinctive niche is rigorous study of foundational issues concerning the mental, socio-cultural, and mediational processes and conditions of learning and intellectual competence. For these purposes, both “cognition” and “instruction” must be interpreted broadly. The journal preferentially attends to the “how” of learning and intellectual practices. A balance of well-reasoned theory and careful and reflective empirical technique is typical.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信