社交焦虑障碍的患病率和社会人口学相关性:一项全国重点调查

Q1 Psychology
A. Ambusaidi, S. Al-Huseini, Hiba Alshaqsi, Manal AlGhafri, M. Chan, N. Al-Sibani, S. Al-Adawi, M. Qoronfleh
{"title":"社交焦虑障碍的患病率和社会人口学相关性:一项全国重点调查","authors":"A. Ambusaidi, S. Al-Huseini, Hiba Alshaqsi, Manal AlGhafri, M. Chan, N. Al-Sibani, S. Al-Adawi, M. Qoronfleh","doi":"10.1177/24705470221081215","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background Social Anxiety Disorder (SAD) is among the most common anxiety disorders worldwide with data largely emerging from the Euro-American and Pacific Rim populations. In contrast, there is a dearth of studies among the populations of Arabian Gulf countries including Oman. This study has two interrelated aims: (i) to explore the prevalence of SAD among Omani adults, and (ii) to tease out the links between socio-demographic factors and SAD in Oman. Methods A cross-sectional study via an online survey was conducted among 1019 adult Omani nationals residing in Oman. The presence of SAD was assessed using the Arabic version of the Liebowitz Social Anxiety Scale (LSAS). Results Nearly half the participants (45.9%, n = 468) exhibited “caseness” for SAD as defined by LSAS. In the multivariate logistic analysis, participants below 40 years of age were 1.6 times (OR = 1.568, p = .026) more likely to have caseness for SAD than those who were 40 and older. Women were 1.3 times (OR = 1.348, p = .038) more likely to exhibit caseness for SAD than men. Participants who had secondary or undergraduate education were respectively 1.5 times (OR = 1.45, p = .014) and 2.5 times (OR = 2.509, p < .001) to have caseness for SAD than those who were graduates. Conclusion The present data suggest that 45.9% of the participants reached the cut-off for caseness in LSAS, which is high compared to reports from other populations. The present accrued frequency is discussed within the context of the accrued response rate, socio-cultural factors as well as the tendency for self-reported measures to “produce” spurious results is also highlighted which, in turn, calls for studies that adopt more inclusive survey methods.","PeriodicalId":52315,"journal":{"name":"Chronic Stress","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Prevalence and Sociodemographic Correlates of Social Anxiety Disorder: A Focused National Survey\",\"authors\":\"A. Ambusaidi, S. Al-Huseini, Hiba Alshaqsi, Manal AlGhafri, M. Chan, N. Al-Sibani, S. Al-Adawi, M. Qoronfleh\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/24705470221081215\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background Social Anxiety Disorder (SAD) is among the most common anxiety disorders worldwide with data largely emerging from the Euro-American and Pacific Rim populations. In contrast, there is a dearth of studies among the populations of Arabian Gulf countries including Oman. This study has two interrelated aims: (i) to explore the prevalence of SAD among Omani adults, and (ii) to tease out the links between socio-demographic factors and SAD in Oman. Methods A cross-sectional study via an online survey was conducted among 1019 adult Omani nationals residing in Oman. The presence of SAD was assessed using the Arabic version of the Liebowitz Social Anxiety Scale (LSAS). Results Nearly half the participants (45.9%, n = 468) exhibited “caseness” for SAD as defined by LSAS. In the multivariate logistic analysis, participants below 40 years of age were 1.6 times (OR = 1.568, p = .026) more likely to have caseness for SAD than those who were 40 and older. Women were 1.3 times (OR = 1.348, p = .038) more likely to exhibit caseness for SAD than men. Participants who had secondary or undergraduate education were respectively 1.5 times (OR = 1.45, p = .014) and 2.5 times (OR = 2.509, p < .001) to have caseness for SAD than those who were graduates. Conclusion The present data suggest that 45.9% of the participants reached the cut-off for caseness in LSAS, which is high compared to reports from other populations. The present accrued frequency is discussed within the context of the accrued response rate, socio-cultural factors as well as the tendency for self-reported measures to “produce” spurious results is also highlighted which, in turn, calls for studies that adopt more inclusive survey methods.\",\"PeriodicalId\":52315,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Chronic Stress\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Chronic Stress\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/24705470221081215\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Psychology\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chronic Stress","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/24705470221081215","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Psychology","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

背景社交焦虑症(SAD)是世界范围内最常见的焦虑症之一,数据主要来自欧美和环太平洋地区的人群。相比之下,对包括阿曼在内的阿拉伯湾国家人口的研究却很少。本研究有两个相互关联的目的:(i)探讨阿曼成年人SAD的患病率,以及(ii)梳理阿曼社会人口因素与SAD之间的联系。方法通过在线调查对1019名居住在阿曼的成年阿曼国民进行横断面研究。SAD的存在使用阿拉伯版本的Liebowitz社会焦虑量表(LSAS)进行评估。结果近一半的参与者(45.9% = 468)对LSAS定义的SAD表现出“个案性”。在多变量逻辑分析中,40岁以下的参与者是1.6倍(OR = 1.568,p = .026)比40岁及以上的人更有可能患有SAD。女性为1.3倍(OR = 1.348,p = .038)比男性更有可能表现出SAD病例。受过中等或本科教育的参与者分别是1.5倍(or = 1.45,p= .014)和2.5倍(OR = 2.509,p < .001)比那些毕业生有SAD的案例。结论目前的数据表明,45.9%的参与者达到了LSAS病例数的临界值,与其他人群的报告相比,这一数字很高。目前的累积频率是在累积回复率的背景下讨论的,社会文化因素以及自我报告的措施“产生”虚假结果的趋势也得到了强调,这反过来要求研究采用更具包容性的调查方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Prevalence and Sociodemographic Correlates of Social Anxiety Disorder: A Focused National Survey
Background Social Anxiety Disorder (SAD) is among the most common anxiety disorders worldwide with data largely emerging from the Euro-American and Pacific Rim populations. In contrast, there is a dearth of studies among the populations of Arabian Gulf countries including Oman. This study has two interrelated aims: (i) to explore the prevalence of SAD among Omani adults, and (ii) to tease out the links between socio-demographic factors and SAD in Oman. Methods A cross-sectional study via an online survey was conducted among 1019 adult Omani nationals residing in Oman. The presence of SAD was assessed using the Arabic version of the Liebowitz Social Anxiety Scale (LSAS). Results Nearly half the participants (45.9%, n = 468) exhibited “caseness” for SAD as defined by LSAS. In the multivariate logistic analysis, participants below 40 years of age were 1.6 times (OR = 1.568, p = .026) more likely to have caseness for SAD than those who were 40 and older. Women were 1.3 times (OR = 1.348, p = .038) more likely to exhibit caseness for SAD than men. Participants who had secondary or undergraduate education were respectively 1.5 times (OR = 1.45, p = .014) and 2.5 times (OR = 2.509, p < .001) to have caseness for SAD than those who were graduates. Conclusion The present data suggest that 45.9% of the participants reached the cut-off for caseness in LSAS, which is high compared to reports from other populations. The present accrued frequency is discussed within the context of the accrued response rate, socio-cultural factors as well as the tendency for self-reported measures to “produce” spurious results is also highlighted which, in turn, calls for studies that adopt more inclusive survey methods.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Chronic Stress
Chronic Stress Psychology-Clinical Psychology
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
25
审稿时长
6 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信