加用多种新型药物二级预防动脉粥样硬化性心血管疾病的估计总治疗效益

IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Robert W. Ariss, Rajesh Gupta
{"title":"加用多种新型药物二级预防动脉粥样硬化性心血管疾病的估计总治疗效益","authors":"Robert W. Ariss, Rajesh Gupta","doi":"10.1177/10742484221084772","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: Interest in improving residual cardiovascular (CV) risk by targeting multiple causative pathways has been growing. Several medications including icosapent ethyl, rivaroxaban, and ezetimibe have been shown to individually improve outcomes in the secondary prevention of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) beyond conventional therapy consisting of aspirin and statins. While each drug has been shown to individually improve outcomes, the expected treatment benefit of the combined use of these drugs for enhanced secondary prevention of ASCVD is not known. Methods: In this cross-trial analysis, we estimated the aggregate treatment effect of comprehensive medical therapy consisting of icosapent ethyl, rivaroxaban, and ezetimibe added to background aspirin and statin therapy through established methods of indirect comparisons of the results of three key clinical trials (REDUCE-IT [n = 8,179], COMPASS [n = 27,395], and IMPROVE-IT [n = 18,144]). The primary endpoint was a composite of cardiovascular death, non-fatal myocardial infarction (MI), or non-fatal stroke. Secondary endpoints included each individual component of the primary endpoint. Results: The hazard ratio (HR) of the imputed aggregate treatment effects for enhanced secondary prevention of ASCVD with comprehensive disease modifying therapy compared to aspirin and statin alone for the primary endpoint was 0.51 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.42-0.61). The HR for CV death was 0.62 (95% CI 0.46-0.85), non-fatal MI was 0.52 (95% CI 0.40-0.69), and non-fatal stroke was 0.35 (95% CI 0.23-0.54). The results were similar in sensitivity analyses. Conclusion: The estimated aggregate treatment effect of enhanced secondary prevention of ASCVD through comprehensive medical therapy is substantial. This exploratory analysis supports further study of comprehensive therapy to reduce residual CV risk for the secondary prevention of ASCVD.","PeriodicalId":15281,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology and Therapeutics","volume":"27 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Estimated Aggregate Treatment Benefit With Addition of Multiple Novel Medications for Secondary Prevention of Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease\",\"authors\":\"Robert W. Ariss, Rajesh Gupta\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/10742484221084772\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Purpose: Interest in improving residual cardiovascular (CV) risk by targeting multiple causative pathways has been growing. Several medications including icosapent ethyl, rivaroxaban, and ezetimibe have been shown to individually improve outcomes in the secondary prevention of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) beyond conventional therapy consisting of aspirin and statins. While each drug has been shown to individually improve outcomes, the expected treatment benefit of the combined use of these drugs for enhanced secondary prevention of ASCVD is not known. Methods: In this cross-trial analysis, we estimated the aggregate treatment effect of comprehensive medical therapy consisting of icosapent ethyl, rivaroxaban, and ezetimibe added to background aspirin and statin therapy through established methods of indirect comparisons of the results of three key clinical trials (REDUCE-IT [n = 8,179], COMPASS [n = 27,395], and IMPROVE-IT [n = 18,144]). The primary endpoint was a composite of cardiovascular death, non-fatal myocardial infarction (MI), or non-fatal stroke. Secondary endpoints included each individual component of the primary endpoint. Results: The hazard ratio (HR) of the imputed aggregate treatment effects for enhanced secondary prevention of ASCVD with comprehensive disease modifying therapy compared to aspirin and statin alone for the primary endpoint was 0.51 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.42-0.61). The HR for CV death was 0.62 (95% CI 0.46-0.85), non-fatal MI was 0.52 (95% CI 0.40-0.69), and non-fatal stroke was 0.35 (95% CI 0.23-0.54). The results were similar in sensitivity analyses. Conclusion: The estimated aggregate treatment effect of enhanced secondary prevention of ASCVD through comprehensive medical therapy is substantial. This exploratory analysis supports further study of comprehensive therapy to reduce residual CV risk for the secondary prevention of ASCVD.\",\"PeriodicalId\":15281,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology and Therapeutics\",\"volume\":\"27 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology and Therapeutics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/10742484221084772\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology and Therapeutics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10742484221084772","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:通过针对多种致病途径来改善剩余心血管(CV)风险的兴趣越来越大。几种药物,包括伊沙喷二乙基、利伐沙班和依折替米贝,已被证明在动脉粥样硬化性心血管疾病(ASCVD)的二级预防中,比阿司匹林和他汀类药物的常规治疗更能单独改善预后。虽然每种药物已被证明可以单独改善预后,但联合使用这些药物增强ASCVD二级预防的预期治疗益处尚不清楚。方法:在交叉试验分析中,我们通过建立的三个关键临床试验(REDUCE-IT [n = 8,179]、COMPASS [n = 27,395]和IMPROVE-IT [n = 18,144])的间接比较方法,估计了在阿司匹林和他汀类药物的背景治疗中加入伊沙苯乙酯、利伐沙班和依折替米贝的综合药物治疗的总体治疗效果。主要终点为心血管死亡、非致死性心肌梗死(MI)或非致死性卒中的复合终点。次要终点包括主要终点的每个单独组成部分。结果:与阿司匹林和他汀类药物单独用于主要终点相比,综合疾病改善治疗增强ASCVD二级预防的估算总体治疗效果的风险比(HR)为0.51(95%可信区间[CI] 0.42-0.61)。CV死亡的HR为0.62 (95% CI 0.46-0.85),非致死性MI为0.52 (95% CI 0.40-0.69),非致死性卒中为0.35 (95% CI 0.23-0.54)。敏感性分析结果相似。结论:通过综合药物治疗加强ASCVD二级预防的综合治疗效果是可观的。该探索性分析支持进一步研究降低ASCVD二级预防残余CV风险的综合治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Estimated Aggregate Treatment Benefit With Addition of Multiple Novel Medications for Secondary Prevention of Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease
Purpose: Interest in improving residual cardiovascular (CV) risk by targeting multiple causative pathways has been growing. Several medications including icosapent ethyl, rivaroxaban, and ezetimibe have been shown to individually improve outcomes in the secondary prevention of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) beyond conventional therapy consisting of aspirin and statins. While each drug has been shown to individually improve outcomes, the expected treatment benefit of the combined use of these drugs for enhanced secondary prevention of ASCVD is not known. Methods: In this cross-trial analysis, we estimated the aggregate treatment effect of comprehensive medical therapy consisting of icosapent ethyl, rivaroxaban, and ezetimibe added to background aspirin and statin therapy through established methods of indirect comparisons of the results of three key clinical trials (REDUCE-IT [n = 8,179], COMPASS [n = 27,395], and IMPROVE-IT [n = 18,144]). The primary endpoint was a composite of cardiovascular death, non-fatal myocardial infarction (MI), or non-fatal stroke. Secondary endpoints included each individual component of the primary endpoint. Results: The hazard ratio (HR) of the imputed aggregate treatment effects for enhanced secondary prevention of ASCVD with comprehensive disease modifying therapy compared to aspirin and statin alone for the primary endpoint was 0.51 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.42-0.61). The HR for CV death was 0.62 (95% CI 0.46-0.85), non-fatal MI was 0.52 (95% CI 0.40-0.69), and non-fatal stroke was 0.35 (95% CI 0.23-0.54). The results were similar in sensitivity analyses. Conclusion: The estimated aggregate treatment effect of enhanced secondary prevention of ASCVD through comprehensive medical therapy is substantial. This exploratory analysis supports further study of comprehensive therapy to reduce residual CV risk for the secondary prevention of ASCVD.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
33
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology and Therapeutics (JCPT) is a peer-reviewed journal that publishes original basic human studies, animal studies, and bench research with potential clinical application to cardiovascular pharmacology and therapeutics. Experimental studies focus on translational research. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信