查尔斯·赫顿和1783-84年的“分歧”:科学网络及其失败

IF 0.4 3区哲学 Q3 HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE

Notes and Records-The Royal Society Journal of the History of Science Pub Date : 2017-03-20 DOI:10.1098/rsnr.2016.0016

B. Wardhaugh

{"title":"查尔斯·赫顿和1783-84年的“分歧”:科学网络及其失败","authors":"B. Wardhaugh","doi":"10.1098/rsnr.2016.0016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper proposes a fresh look at the ‘Dissensions’ that held up scientific business at the Royal Society during the spring of 1784. It focuses attention on the career and personal networks of Charles Hutton, whose dismissal from the role of Foreign Secretary ignited the row. It shows that the incident had no single cause but was the outcome of several factors that made Hutton intolerable to Joseph Banks, President of the Society, and of several factors that made Banks unpopular as President among a group of about 40 otherwise rather disparate Fellows.","PeriodicalId":49744,"journal":{"name":"Notes and Records-The Royal Society Journal of the History of Science","volume":"71 1","pages":"41 - 59"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2017-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1098/rsnr.2016.0016","citationCount":"11","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Charles Hutton and the ‘Dissensions’ of 1783–84: scientific networking and its failures\",\"authors\":\"B. Wardhaugh\",\"doi\":\"10.1098/rsnr.2016.0016\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper proposes a fresh look at the ‘Dissensions’ that held up scientific business at the Royal Society during the spring of 1784. It focuses attention on the career and personal networks of Charles Hutton, whose dismissal from the role of Foreign Secretary ignited the row. It shows that the incident had no single cause but was the outcome of several factors that made Hutton intolerable to Joseph Banks, President of the Society, and of several factors that made Banks unpopular as President among a group of about 40 otherwise rather disparate Fellows.\",\"PeriodicalId\":49744,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Notes and Records-The Royal Society Journal of the History of Science\",\"volume\":\"71 1\",\"pages\":\"41 - 59\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-03-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1098/rsnr.2016.0016\",\"citationCount\":\"11\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Notes and Records-The Royal Society Journal of the History of Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1098/rsnr.2016.0016\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"哲学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Notes and Records-The Royal Society Journal of the History of Science","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1098/rsnr.2016.0016","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 11

摘要

本文对1784年春季阻碍英国皇家学会科学业务的“分歧”提出了新的看法。它将注意力集中在查尔斯·赫顿的职业和个人网络上，他被解除外交大臣的职务引发了争议。它表明，这起事件没有单一的原因，而是几个因素的结果，这些因素使赫顿对协会主席约瑟夫·班克斯无法容忍，也有几个因素使班克斯在大约40名不同的研究员中不受欢迎。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Charles Hutton and the ‘Dissensions’ of 1783–84: scientific networking and its failures

This paper proposes a fresh look at the ‘Dissensions’ that held up scientific business at the Royal Society during the spring of 1784. It focuses attention on the career and personal networks of Charles Hutton, whose dismissal from the role of Foreign Secretary ignited the row. It shows that the incident had no single cause but was the outcome of several factors that made Hutton intolerable to Joseph Banks, President of the Society, and of several factors that made Banks unpopular as President among a group of about 40 otherwise rather disparate Fellows.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Notes and Records-The Royal Society Journal of the History of Science 综合性期刊-科学史与科学哲学

CiteScore

1.50

自引率

0.00%

发文量

审稿时长

>12 weeks

期刊介绍： Notes and Records is an international journal which publishes original research in the history of science, technology and medicine. In addition to publishing peer-reviewed research articles in all areas of the history of science, technology and medicine, Notes and Records welcomes other forms of contribution including: research notes elucidating recent archival discoveries (in the collections of the Royal Society and elsewhere); news of research projects and online and other resources of interest to historians; essay reviews, on material relating primarily to the history of the Royal Society; and recollections or autobiographical accounts written by Fellows and others recording important moments in science from the recent past.