循环系统死亡后的肺捐献:不受控制的捐献者的单中心经验

Q4 Medicine
Eleonora Faccioli, Vincenzo Verzeletti, Federico Rea, Marco Schiavon
{"title":"循环系统死亡后的肺捐献:不受控制的捐献者的单中心经验","authors":"Eleonora Faccioli,&nbsp;Vincenzo Verzeletti,&nbsp;Federico Rea,&nbsp;Marco Schiavon","doi":"10.1016/j.tpr.2022.100117","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Organ shortage represents one of the main issues associated with lung transplantation (LTx). Over the years, in an attempt to increase the donor pool, the use of donors after cardiac death (DCDs) has gradually increased, with good results that bode well for their wider use in the future.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>In this work, our experience with DCDs is presented. In addition, a brief literature review on controlled (c) and uncontrolled (u) DCDs was performed on the studies published in the last four years.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>From 2018 to 2022 our center performed three LTx with DCDs. All the donors were uDCDs (Maastricht class II). The median warm ischemic time of the graft was 160 min. In all the three LTx, lungs were reconditioned using portable Ex-Vivo-Lung-Perfusion (EVLP) system (Organ Care System, OCS, TransMedics) for a median time of 535 min. All the three LTx were performed with an intraoperative veno-arterial extra-corporeal membrane oxygenation (V-A ECMO), which was prolonged postoperatively in one patient.</p><p>Grade 3 primary graft disfunction (PGD) at 72 h was observed in one patient. No signs of acute rejection were observed in any patient at the surveillance transbronchial biopsies. One patient died 317 after LTx for consequences of a lung adenocarcinoma diagnosed in the native lung, while the other two are still alive with a preserved graft function.</p></div><div><h3>Summary</h3><p>The most recent studies confirm similar results between DCDs and DBDs in terms of survival and graft function. Good results can also be achieved in uDCDs if standardized protocols are followed and graft function is monitored by EVLP.</p><p>Hence, the use of DCDs represents a valid solution to expand the donor pool.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":37786,"journal":{"name":"Transplantation Reports","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2451959622000257/pdfft?md5=bdbdf0f4b6f389e0d7b7664d4c5fed00&pid=1-s2.0-S2451959622000257-main.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Lung donation after circulatory death: A single-centre experience with uncontrolled donors with some considerations\",\"authors\":\"Eleonora Faccioli,&nbsp;Vincenzo Verzeletti,&nbsp;Federico Rea,&nbsp;Marco Schiavon\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.tpr.2022.100117\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Organ shortage represents one of the main issues associated with lung transplantation (LTx). Over the years, in an attempt to increase the donor pool, the use of donors after cardiac death (DCDs) has gradually increased, with good results that bode well for their wider use in the future.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>In this work, our experience with DCDs is presented. In addition, a brief literature review on controlled (c) and uncontrolled (u) DCDs was performed on the studies published in the last four years.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>From 2018 to 2022 our center performed three LTx with DCDs. All the donors were uDCDs (Maastricht class II). The median warm ischemic time of the graft was 160 min. In all the three LTx, lungs were reconditioned using portable Ex-Vivo-Lung-Perfusion (EVLP) system (Organ Care System, OCS, TransMedics) for a median time of 535 min. All the three LTx were performed with an intraoperative veno-arterial extra-corporeal membrane oxygenation (V-A ECMO), which was prolonged postoperatively in one patient.</p><p>Grade 3 primary graft disfunction (PGD) at 72 h was observed in one patient. No signs of acute rejection were observed in any patient at the surveillance transbronchial biopsies. One patient died 317 after LTx for consequences of a lung adenocarcinoma diagnosed in the native lung, while the other two are still alive with a preserved graft function.</p></div><div><h3>Summary</h3><p>The most recent studies confirm similar results between DCDs and DBDs in terms of survival and graft function. Good results can also be achieved in uDCDs if standardized protocols are followed and graft function is monitored by EVLP.</p><p>Hence, the use of DCDs represents a valid solution to expand the donor pool.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":37786,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Transplantation Reports\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2451959622000257/pdfft?md5=bdbdf0f4b6f389e0d7b7664d4c5fed00&pid=1-s2.0-S2451959622000257-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Transplantation Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2451959622000257\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transplantation Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2451959622000257","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

器官短缺是肺移植(LTx)的主要问题之一。多年来,为了增加供体池,心脏死亡后供体(dcd)的使用逐渐增加,取得了良好的效果,预示着未来更广泛的使用。方法在本工作中,介绍了我们在dcd方面的经验。此外,对过去四年发表的研究进行了受控(c)和非受控(u) dcd的简要文献综述。结果2018年至2022年,我中心采用dcd进行了3例LTx手术。所有供体均为udcd (Maastricht II类)。移植物的中位热缺血时间为160分钟。在所有3例LTx中,使用便携式离体肺灌注(EVLP)系统(器官护理系统,OCS, TransMedics)进行肺修复,中位时间为535分钟。所有3例LTx均采用术中静脉-动脉体外膜外氧合(V-A ECMO)进行,其中1例患者术后延长了这一时间。1例患者72小时出现3级原发性移植物功能障碍(PGD)。在经支气管活检的监测中,没有观察到急性排斥反应的迹象。一名患者在移植后317年死于肺腺癌的后果,而另外两名患者仍然存活,并保留了移植功能。最近的研究证实了dcd和dbd在存活和移植物功能方面的相似结果。如果遵循标准化方案并通过EVLP监测移植物功能,udcd也可以取得良好的效果。因此,使用dcd是扩大捐助者池的有效解决办法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Lung donation after circulatory death: A single-centre experience with uncontrolled donors with some considerations

Introduction

Organ shortage represents one of the main issues associated with lung transplantation (LTx). Over the years, in an attempt to increase the donor pool, the use of donors after cardiac death (DCDs) has gradually increased, with good results that bode well for their wider use in the future.

Methods

In this work, our experience with DCDs is presented. In addition, a brief literature review on controlled (c) and uncontrolled (u) DCDs was performed on the studies published in the last four years.

Results

From 2018 to 2022 our center performed three LTx with DCDs. All the donors were uDCDs (Maastricht class II). The median warm ischemic time of the graft was 160 min. In all the three LTx, lungs were reconditioned using portable Ex-Vivo-Lung-Perfusion (EVLP) system (Organ Care System, OCS, TransMedics) for a median time of 535 min. All the three LTx were performed with an intraoperative veno-arterial extra-corporeal membrane oxygenation (V-A ECMO), which was prolonged postoperatively in one patient.

Grade 3 primary graft disfunction (PGD) at 72 h was observed in one patient. No signs of acute rejection were observed in any patient at the surveillance transbronchial biopsies. One patient died 317 after LTx for consequences of a lung adenocarcinoma diagnosed in the native lung, while the other two are still alive with a preserved graft function.

Summary

The most recent studies confirm similar results between DCDs and DBDs in terms of survival and graft function. Good results can also be achieved in uDCDs if standardized protocols are followed and graft function is monitored by EVLP.

Hence, the use of DCDs represents a valid solution to expand the donor pool.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Transplantation Reports
Transplantation Reports Medicine-Transplantation
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
24
审稿时长
101 days
期刊介绍: To provide to national and regional audiences experiences unique to them or confirming of broader concepts originating in large controlled trials. All aspects of organ, tissue and cell transplantation clinically and experimentally. Transplantation Reports will provide in-depth representation of emerging preclinical, impactful and clinical experiences. -Original basic or clinical science articles that represent initial limited experiences as preliminary reports. -Clinical trials of therapies previously well documented in large trials but now tested in limited, special, ethnic or clinically unique patient populations. -Case studies that confirm prior reports but have occurred in patients displaying unique clinical characteristics such as ethnicities or rarely associated co-morbidities. Transplantation Reports offers these benefits: -Fast and fair peer review -Rapid, article-based publication -Unrivalled visibility and exposure for your research -Immediate, free and permanent access to your paper on Science Direct -Immediately citable using the article DOI
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信