{"title":"低视力辅助与康复患者初始视力对视力预后的影响","authors":"A. Deniz, Adibelli Fatih Mehmet","doi":"10.23937/2378-346X/1410087","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: To analyze the initial visual acuities of cases referred to our clinic due to low vision and the effect on visual prognosis. Materials and methods: A retrospective evaluation was carried out on 869 eyes of 464 patients who were referred to our center due to low vision between December 2010 and May 2015. Distance acuities of the patients were measured with a distant vision chart prepared for patients with low vision, and the near acuities were measured with a Jaeger near vision chart. Patients with logMAR ≥ 0.5 [snellen ≤ 20/63] visual acuity were included in the study. Cases were separated into 4 groups according to initial distant acuity and 3 groups according to the initial near acuity values. In the statistical analysis, a value of p < 0.05 was accepted as statistically significant. Results: The mean distant acuity of the cases was found to be 0.13 ± 0.11 (Snellen) (mean logMAR 0.9) and 0.55 ± 0.29 (Snellen) (mean logMAR 0.3) respectively before and after the low vision aid (LVA) examination. The mean near acuity of the cases was J 13.93 ± 4.21 (mean logMAR 0.8) and J 7.76 ± 4.51 (mean logMAR 0.4) respectively before and after the LVA. Initial distant visual acuity was logMAR > 1.3 [Snellen < 20/400] in 14%, logMAR 1.3-1.0 [snellen 20/400-20/200] in 48%, logMAR 0.7-1.0 [snellen 20/200-20/100] in 22% and logMAR < 0.7 [> snellen 20/100] in 16% of the cases. In total, it was seen that the visual acuity of 62% of the cases was at the level of “legally blind” (logMAR ≥ 1.0) [snellen ≤ 20/200]. The distant and near visual acuities before LVA were determined as the factors that had the greatest effect on the improvement of distant and near acuities of the patients. Conclusion: The visual acuity at the time of application is the primary factor affecting LVA success. In this study, the visual acuity of the cases referred to our center for LVA was evaluated as quite low, sufficient time could not be allocated to cases due to intense polyclinic conditions and patients were referred late. With earlier referral, it would be possible to enable patients to remain more self-sufficient.","PeriodicalId":91712,"journal":{"name":"International journal of ophthalmology and clinical research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Effect of Initial Visual Acuity on Visual Prognosis in Low Vision Aid and Rehabilitation Cases\",\"authors\":\"A. Deniz, Adibelli Fatih Mehmet\",\"doi\":\"10.23937/2378-346X/1410087\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Purpose: To analyze the initial visual acuities of cases referred to our clinic due to low vision and the effect on visual prognosis. Materials and methods: A retrospective evaluation was carried out on 869 eyes of 464 patients who were referred to our center due to low vision between December 2010 and May 2015. Distance acuities of the patients were measured with a distant vision chart prepared for patients with low vision, and the near acuities were measured with a Jaeger near vision chart. Patients with logMAR ≥ 0.5 [snellen ≤ 20/63] visual acuity were included in the study. Cases were separated into 4 groups according to initial distant acuity and 3 groups according to the initial near acuity values. In the statistical analysis, a value of p < 0.05 was accepted as statistically significant. Results: The mean distant acuity of the cases was found to be 0.13 ± 0.11 (Snellen) (mean logMAR 0.9) and 0.55 ± 0.29 (Snellen) (mean logMAR 0.3) respectively before and after the low vision aid (LVA) examination. The mean near acuity of the cases was J 13.93 ± 4.21 (mean logMAR 0.8) and J 7.76 ± 4.51 (mean logMAR 0.4) respectively before and after the LVA. Initial distant visual acuity was logMAR > 1.3 [Snellen < 20/400] in 14%, logMAR 1.3-1.0 [snellen 20/400-20/200] in 48%, logMAR 0.7-1.0 [snellen 20/200-20/100] in 22% and logMAR < 0.7 [> snellen 20/100] in 16% of the cases. In total, it was seen that the visual acuity of 62% of the cases was at the level of “legally blind” (logMAR ≥ 1.0) [snellen ≤ 20/200]. The distant and near visual acuities before LVA were determined as the factors that had the greatest effect on the improvement of distant and near acuities of the patients. Conclusion: The visual acuity at the time of application is the primary factor affecting LVA success. In this study, the visual acuity of the cases referred to our center for LVA was evaluated as quite low, sufficient time could not be allocated to cases due to intense polyclinic conditions and patients were referred late. With earlier referral, it would be possible to enable patients to remain more self-sufficient.\",\"PeriodicalId\":91712,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International journal of ophthalmology and clinical research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-06-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International journal of ophthalmology and clinical research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.23937/2378-346X/1410087\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of ophthalmology and clinical research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23937/2378-346X/1410087","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:分析因视力低下而转诊到我们诊所的病例的初始视力及其对视力预后的影响。材料和方法:对2010年12月至2015年5月期间因视力低下转诊至我中心的464名患者中的869只眼进行回顾性评估。用为低视力患者准备的远视图测量患者的距离敏锐度,用Jaeger近视图测量近距离敏锐度。logMAR≥0.5[snellen≤20/63]视力的患者被纳入研究。根据初始远视敏锐度将病例分为4组,根据初始近敏锐度分为3组。在统计分析中,p<0.05的值被认为具有统计学意义。结果:在低视力辅助检查前后,患者的平均远视敏锐度分别为0.13±0.11(Snellen)(平均logMAR 0.9)和0.55±0.29(Snelle)(平均log MAR 0.3)。LVA前后的平均近敏度分别为J 13.93±4.21(平均logMAR 0.8)和J 7.76±4.51(平均log MAR 0.4)。14%的病例的初始远视敏锐度为logMAR>1.3[Snellen<20/400],48%的病例为logMAR1.3-1.0[Snellen 20/400-20/200],22%的病例为LogMAR0.7-1.0[Sneellen 20/200-20/100],16%的病例为logMAR<0.7[>Snellen 20/100]。总的来说,62%的病例的视力处于“合法失明”水平(logMAR≥1.0)[snellen≤20/200]。LVA前的远视和近视敏锐度被确定为对患者远视和近视敏锐度改善影响最大的因素。结论:应用时的视力是影响LVA成功的主要因素。在这项研究中,转诊到我们中心的LVA病例的视力被评估为非常低,由于综合诊所条件恶劣,无法为病例分配足够的时间,患者转诊较晚。通过尽早转诊,患者将有可能保持更自给自足的状态。
The Effect of Initial Visual Acuity on Visual Prognosis in Low Vision Aid and Rehabilitation Cases
Purpose: To analyze the initial visual acuities of cases referred to our clinic due to low vision and the effect on visual prognosis. Materials and methods: A retrospective evaluation was carried out on 869 eyes of 464 patients who were referred to our center due to low vision between December 2010 and May 2015. Distance acuities of the patients were measured with a distant vision chart prepared for patients with low vision, and the near acuities were measured with a Jaeger near vision chart. Patients with logMAR ≥ 0.5 [snellen ≤ 20/63] visual acuity were included in the study. Cases were separated into 4 groups according to initial distant acuity and 3 groups according to the initial near acuity values. In the statistical analysis, a value of p < 0.05 was accepted as statistically significant. Results: The mean distant acuity of the cases was found to be 0.13 ± 0.11 (Snellen) (mean logMAR 0.9) and 0.55 ± 0.29 (Snellen) (mean logMAR 0.3) respectively before and after the low vision aid (LVA) examination. The mean near acuity of the cases was J 13.93 ± 4.21 (mean logMAR 0.8) and J 7.76 ± 4.51 (mean logMAR 0.4) respectively before and after the LVA. Initial distant visual acuity was logMAR > 1.3 [Snellen < 20/400] in 14%, logMAR 1.3-1.0 [snellen 20/400-20/200] in 48%, logMAR 0.7-1.0 [snellen 20/200-20/100] in 22% and logMAR < 0.7 [> snellen 20/100] in 16% of the cases. In total, it was seen that the visual acuity of 62% of the cases was at the level of “legally blind” (logMAR ≥ 1.0) [snellen ≤ 20/200]. The distant and near visual acuities before LVA were determined as the factors that had the greatest effect on the improvement of distant and near acuities of the patients. Conclusion: The visual acuity at the time of application is the primary factor affecting LVA success. In this study, the visual acuity of the cases referred to our center for LVA was evaluated as quite low, sufficient time could not be allocated to cases due to intense polyclinic conditions and patients were referred late. With earlier referral, it would be possible to enable patients to remain more self-sufficient.