中空度和内腔结构对3D打印材料力学性能影响的研究

Q1 Engineering
Oliver Exley, Yasith S. Perera, Chamil Abeykoon
{"title":"中空度和内腔结构对3D打印材料力学性能影响的研究","authors":"Oliver Exley,&nbsp;Yasith S. Perera,&nbsp;Chamil Abeykoon","doi":"10.1016/j.ijlmm.2023.06.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Despite the wide growth of additive manufacturing, it is still very expensive to mass produce 3D-printed parts. The costs can be minimized if the quantity of material required to produce a part can be substantially reduced by introducing hollow cavities into the structure, without compromising its properties. This study investigates the effect of the degree of hollowness and different internal cavity structures on the mechanical properties of 3D-printed materials. Test specimens were prepared with four polymeric materials (i.e., acrylonitrile butadiene styrene (ABS), polylactic acid (PLA), carbon fiber-reinforced (CFR) ABS, and CFR PLA) using the fused deposition modeling 3D printing technique. Internal hollow cavities were introduced to the specimens during printing and the specimens were prepared with three different cavity structures (i.e., hexagonal honeycomb, circular drills, and squares), and the degree of hollowness was varied from 0% to 30% in 10% increments. Tensile and flexural properties of the 3D-printed specimens were evaluated and analyzed. The mechanical properties of all specimens were found to decrease with increasing hollowness levels, regardless of the type of material or the internal cavity structure. The hexagonal honeycomb structure showed the best tensile properties out of the three internal cavity structures, while the flexural properties were not significantly affected by the internal cavity structure. The material type had a significant impact on the mechanical properties with PLA exhibiting better tensile and flexural properties than ABS, while their carbon fire reinforced counterparts showed enhanced mechanical properties than pure ABS and PLA.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":52306,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Lightweight Materials and Manufacture","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2588840423000380/pdfft?md5=a012c5acc56d30c62ffb33efa5ccd02a&pid=1-s2.0-S2588840423000380-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Investigation of the effect of the degree of hollowness and internal cavity structure on the mechanical properties of 3D-printed parts\",\"authors\":\"Oliver Exley,&nbsp;Yasith S. Perera,&nbsp;Chamil Abeykoon\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ijlmm.2023.06.005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Despite the wide growth of additive manufacturing, it is still very expensive to mass produce 3D-printed parts. The costs can be minimized if the quantity of material required to produce a part can be substantially reduced by introducing hollow cavities into the structure, without compromising its properties. This study investigates the effect of the degree of hollowness and different internal cavity structures on the mechanical properties of 3D-printed materials. Test specimens were prepared with four polymeric materials (i.e., acrylonitrile butadiene styrene (ABS), polylactic acid (PLA), carbon fiber-reinforced (CFR) ABS, and CFR PLA) using the fused deposition modeling 3D printing technique. Internal hollow cavities were introduced to the specimens during printing and the specimens were prepared with three different cavity structures (i.e., hexagonal honeycomb, circular drills, and squares), and the degree of hollowness was varied from 0% to 30% in 10% increments. Tensile and flexural properties of the 3D-printed specimens were evaluated and analyzed. The mechanical properties of all specimens were found to decrease with increasing hollowness levels, regardless of the type of material or the internal cavity structure. The hexagonal honeycomb structure showed the best tensile properties out of the three internal cavity structures, while the flexural properties were not significantly affected by the internal cavity structure. The material type had a significant impact on the mechanical properties with PLA exhibiting better tensile and flexural properties than ABS, while their carbon fire reinforced counterparts showed enhanced mechanical properties than pure ABS and PLA.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":52306,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Lightweight Materials and Manufacture\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2588840423000380/pdfft?md5=a012c5acc56d30c62ffb33efa5ccd02a&pid=1-s2.0-S2588840423000380-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Lightweight Materials and Manufacture\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2588840423000380\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Engineering\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Lightweight Materials and Manufacture","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2588840423000380","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Engineering","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

尽管增材制造得到了广泛的发展,但批量生产3d打印部件仍然非常昂贵。如果在不影响其性能的情况下,通过在结构中引入空心腔,可以大大减少生产零件所需的材料数量,则可以将成本降至最低。本研究探讨了中空度和不同内腔结构对3d打印材料力学性能的影响。采用熔融沉积建模3D打印技术,采用丙烯腈-丁二烯-苯乙烯(ABS)、聚乳酸(PLA)、碳纤维增强(CFR) ABS和CFR PLA四种聚合物材料制备试件。在打印过程中,在试样中引入内部空腔,制备出三种不同的空腔结构(即六角形蜂窝、圆钻和方形),空腔度以10%的增量从0%到30%不等。对3d打印样品的拉伸和弯曲性能进行了评估和分析。无论材料类型或内腔结构如何,所有试样的力学性能都随着中空程度的增加而降低。在三种内腔结构中,六角形蜂窝结构的拉伸性能最好,而弯曲性能受内腔结构的影响不显著。材料类型对力学性能有显著影响,PLA的拉伸和弯曲性能优于ABS,而碳火增强材料的力学性能优于纯ABS和PLA。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Investigation of the effect of the degree of hollowness and internal cavity structure on the mechanical properties of 3D-printed parts

Despite the wide growth of additive manufacturing, it is still very expensive to mass produce 3D-printed parts. The costs can be minimized if the quantity of material required to produce a part can be substantially reduced by introducing hollow cavities into the structure, without compromising its properties. This study investigates the effect of the degree of hollowness and different internal cavity structures on the mechanical properties of 3D-printed materials. Test specimens were prepared with four polymeric materials (i.e., acrylonitrile butadiene styrene (ABS), polylactic acid (PLA), carbon fiber-reinforced (CFR) ABS, and CFR PLA) using the fused deposition modeling 3D printing technique. Internal hollow cavities were introduced to the specimens during printing and the specimens were prepared with three different cavity structures (i.e., hexagonal honeycomb, circular drills, and squares), and the degree of hollowness was varied from 0% to 30% in 10% increments. Tensile and flexural properties of the 3D-printed specimens were evaluated and analyzed. The mechanical properties of all specimens were found to decrease with increasing hollowness levels, regardless of the type of material or the internal cavity structure. The hexagonal honeycomb structure showed the best tensile properties out of the three internal cavity structures, while the flexural properties were not significantly affected by the internal cavity structure. The material type had a significant impact on the mechanical properties with PLA exhibiting better tensile and flexural properties than ABS, while their carbon fire reinforced counterparts showed enhanced mechanical properties than pure ABS and PLA.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Lightweight Materials and Manufacture
International Journal of Lightweight Materials and Manufacture Engineering-Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering
CiteScore
9.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
52
审稿时长
48 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信