绿色金融对中国绿色建筑发展的支持:效果、机制及政策启示

IF 9.2 2区 经济学 Q1 ECONOMICS
Wenhua He , Pei Liu , Borong Lin , Hao Zhou , Xuesheng Chen
{"title":"绿色金融对中国绿色建筑发展的支持:效果、机制及政策启示","authors":"Wenhua He ,&nbsp;Pei Liu ,&nbsp;Borong Lin ,&nbsp;Hao Zhou ,&nbsp;Xuesheng Chen","doi":"10.1016/j.enpol.2022.112973","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The building sector accounts for a major portion of China's total energy use and energy-related CO<sub>2</sub><span><span> emissions. Promoting the development of green buildings (GBs) via the application of green financial instruments (GFIs, including green fiscal investment, green credit, green insurance, and green bonds) is crucial for China to achieve carbon mitigation goals. This study explores the effect and mechanism of GFIs on supporting the development of GBs using time series </span>econometrics<span>. Results show that the overall green finance system exhibits significant supporting effects on the development of GBs. Among four types of GFIs, green fiscal investment plays a critical and an indispensable role. The effects of alternative GFI combinations on GB development are compared. The combination of green fiscal investment, insurance, and credit shows the most satisfactory supporting effect. In this combination, insurance plays a bridging role, as it better ensures that GBs' actual energy performance meets expected performance, thus promoting green credit financing for GBs. However, the results also indicate that the current green finance market is still in a government-driven pattern. To facilitate its transformation to a market-driven pattern, policies should focus on designing more targeted GFI-combination products, bridging GBs' performance gaps, and updating GBs' rating system.</span></span></p></div>","PeriodicalId":11672,"journal":{"name":"Energy Policy","volume":"165 ","pages":"Article 112973"},"PeriodicalIF":9.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"17","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Green finance support for development of green buildings in China: Effect, mechanism, and policy implications\",\"authors\":\"Wenhua He ,&nbsp;Pei Liu ,&nbsp;Borong Lin ,&nbsp;Hao Zhou ,&nbsp;Xuesheng Chen\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.enpol.2022.112973\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The building sector accounts for a major portion of China's total energy use and energy-related CO<sub>2</sub><span><span> emissions. Promoting the development of green buildings (GBs) via the application of green financial instruments (GFIs, including green fiscal investment, green credit, green insurance, and green bonds) is crucial for China to achieve carbon mitigation goals. This study explores the effect and mechanism of GFIs on supporting the development of GBs using time series </span>econometrics<span>. Results show that the overall green finance system exhibits significant supporting effects on the development of GBs. Among four types of GFIs, green fiscal investment plays a critical and an indispensable role. The effects of alternative GFI combinations on GB development are compared. The combination of green fiscal investment, insurance, and credit shows the most satisfactory supporting effect. In this combination, insurance plays a bridging role, as it better ensures that GBs' actual energy performance meets expected performance, thus promoting green credit financing for GBs. However, the results also indicate that the current green finance market is still in a government-driven pattern. To facilitate its transformation to a market-driven pattern, policies should focus on designing more targeted GFI-combination products, bridging GBs' performance gaps, and updating GBs' rating system.</span></span></p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11672,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Energy Policy\",\"volume\":\"165 \",\"pages\":\"Article 112973\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"17\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Energy Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301421522001987\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Policy","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301421522001987","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 17

摘要

建筑行业占中国能源使用总量和能源相关二氧化碳排放量的很大一部分。通过绿色金融工具(gfi,包括绿色财政投资、绿色信贷、绿色保险和绿色债券)的应用来促进绿色建筑的发展,对于中国实现碳减排目标至关重要。本研究运用时间序列计量经济学的方法,探讨了金融融资平台对中小企业发展的支持作用及其机制。结果表明,整体绿色金融体系对政府债券的发展具有显著的支撑作用。在四种类型的金融融资中,绿色财政投资发挥着至关重要和不可或缺的作用。比较了不同GFI组合对GB发展的影响。绿色财政投资、保险和信贷相结合的支持效果最为理想。在这种组合中,保险发挥了桥梁作用,因为它更好地确保了政府债券的实际能源绩效符合预期绩效,从而促进了政府债券的绿色信贷融资。然而,研究结果也表明,当前的绿色金融市场仍处于政府驱动的模式。为促进其向市场驱动模式转变,政策应侧重于设计更有针对性的gfi组合产品,弥合gfi的绩效差距,并更新gfi评级体系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Green finance support for development of green buildings in China: Effect, mechanism, and policy implications

The building sector accounts for a major portion of China's total energy use and energy-related CO2 emissions. Promoting the development of green buildings (GBs) via the application of green financial instruments (GFIs, including green fiscal investment, green credit, green insurance, and green bonds) is crucial for China to achieve carbon mitigation goals. This study explores the effect and mechanism of GFIs on supporting the development of GBs using time series econometrics. Results show that the overall green finance system exhibits significant supporting effects on the development of GBs. Among four types of GFIs, green fiscal investment plays a critical and an indispensable role. The effects of alternative GFI combinations on GB development are compared. The combination of green fiscal investment, insurance, and credit shows the most satisfactory supporting effect. In this combination, insurance plays a bridging role, as it better ensures that GBs' actual energy performance meets expected performance, thus promoting green credit financing for GBs. However, the results also indicate that the current green finance market is still in a government-driven pattern. To facilitate its transformation to a market-driven pattern, policies should focus on designing more targeted GFI-combination products, bridging GBs' performance gaps, and updating GBs' rating system.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Energy Policy
Energy Policy 管理科学-环境科学
CiteScore
17.30
自引率
5.60%
发文量
540
审稿时长
7.9 months
期刊介绍: Energy policy is the manner in which a given entity (often governmental) has decided to address issues of energy development including energy conversion, distribution and use as well as reduction of greenhouse gas emissions in order to contribute to climate change mitigation. The attributes of energy policy may include legislation, international treaties, incentives to investment, guidelines for energy conservation, taxation and other public policy techniques. Energy policy is closely related to climate change policy because totalled worldwide the energy sector emits more greenhouse gas than other sectors.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信