国际研究:关于什么是重要的争论

IF 3.8 Q2 MANAGEMENT
J. Stewart
{"title":"国际研究:关于什么是重要的争论","authors":"J. Stewart","doi":"10.1080/13678868.2023.2210463","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"I have opened this piece with ‘background’ to help prepare the reader for what follows. I had the pleasure of writing one of the perspectives in the first issue of this journal, and since then I have written a couple more (Stewart 1998, 2005; Elliott and Stewart 2017). The first issue piece was in a section labelled ‘Soapbox’. That label is an appropriate description of each of my previous contributions and also appropriate to what follows. My intention is to be provocative, beginning by saying I wish to challenge lazy thinking about the meaning of a term in use every day in academia but without much, if any, questioning of what is meant when it is used. If you are willing to be challenged, read on.","PeriodicalId":47369,"journal":{"name":"HUMAN RESOURCE DEVELOPMENT INTERNATIONAL","volume":"26 1","pages":"241 - 245"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"International research: a polemic on what counts\",\"authors\":\"J. Stewart\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/13678868.2023.2210463\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"I have opened this piece with ‘background’ to help prepare the reader for what follows. I had the pleasure of writing one of the perspectives in the first issue of this journal, and since then I have written a couple more (Stewart 1998, 2005; Elliott and Stewart 2017). The first issue piece was in a section labelled ‘Soapbox’. That label is an appropriate description of each of my previous contributions and also appropriate to what follows. My intention is to be provocative, beginning by saying I wish to challenge lazy thinking about the meaning of a term in use every day in academia but without much, if any, questioning of what is meant when it is used. If you are willing to be challenged, read on.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47369,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"HUMAN RESOURCE DEVELOPMENT INTERNATIONAL\",\"volume\":\"26 1\",\"pages\":\"241 - 245\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"HUMAN RESOURCE DEVELOPMENT INTERNATIONAL\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/13678868.2023.2210463\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MANAGEMENT\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"HUMAN RESOURCE DEVELOPMENT INTERNATIONAL","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13678868.2023.2210463","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我以“背景”打开这篇文章,帮助读者为接下来的内容做好准备。我很高兴在这本杂志的第一期上写下了其中一个观点,从那以后我又写了几篇(Stewart 19982005;Elliott和Stewart 2017)。第一期文章在一个名为“Soapbox”的部分。这个标签恰当地描述了我以前的每一项贡献,也适用于以下内容。我的意图是挑衅性的,首先我说我希望挑战学术界每天对一个术语含义的懒惰思考,但对它使用时的含义没有太多质疑。如果你愿意接受挑战,请继续阅读。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
International research: a polemic on what counts
I have opened this piece with ‘background’ to help prepare the reader for what follows. I had the pleasure of writing one of the perspectives in the first issue of this journal, and since then I have written a couple more (Stewart 1998, 2005; Elliott and Stewart 2017). The first issue piece was in a section labelled ‘Soapbox’. That label is an appropriate description of each of my previous contributions and also appropriate to what follows. My intention is to be provocative, beginning by saying I wish to challenge lazy thinking about the meaning of a term in use every day in academia but without much, if any, questioning of what is meant when it is used. If you are willing to be challenged, read on.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.40
自引率
11.10%
发文量
43
期刊介绍: Human Resource Development International promotes all aspects of practice and research that explore issues of individual, group and organisational learning and performance. In adopting this perspective Human Resource Development International is committed to questioning the divide between practice and theory; between the practitioner and the academic; and between traditional and experimental methodological approaches. Human Resource Development International is committed to a wide understanding of ''organisation'' - one that extends through self-managed teams, voluntary work, or family businesses to global enterprises and bureaucracies. Human Resource Development International also commits itself to exploring the development of organisations and the life-long learning of people and their collectivity (organisation), their strategy and their policy, from all parts of the world. In this way Human Resource Development International will become a leading forum for debate and exploration of the interdisciplinary field of human resource development.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信