超级优先留置权在美利坚合众国因其州合宪性而受到质疑

IF 0.8 0 ARCHITECTURE
Sadatsugu Nishiura
{"title":"超级优先留置权在美利坚合众国因其州合宪性而受到质疑","authors":"Sadatsugu Nishiura","doi":"10.1002/2475-8876.12382","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This note focuses on super-priority liens (SPLs), which allow homeowner associations to foreclose a property over its mortgage. Twenty-two states have so far implemented such liens, hoping to balance the interests of mortgage creditors and homeowner associations. The state of Nevada has been facing more challenges from both mortgage creditors and homeowner associations regarding the constitutionality of non-judicial foreclosure than other states. This paper summaries the cases since 2000 and discusses the three major decisions that the Supreme Court of Nevada made involving SPLs' non-judicial constitutionality, tender-extinguishing SPLs, and federal creditors' role in SPLs.</p>","PeriodicalId":42793,"journal":{"name":"Japan Architectural Review","volume":"6 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/2475-8876.12382","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Super-priority lien challenged for its state constitutionality in the United States of America\",\"authors\":\"Sadatsugu Nishiura\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/2475-8876.12382\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>This note focuses on super-priority liens (SPLs), which allow homeowner associations to foreclose a property over its mortgage. Twenty-two states have so far implemented such liens, hoping to balance the interests of mortgage creditors and homeowner associations. The state of Nevada has been facing more challenges from both mortgage creditors and homeowner associations regarding the constitutionality of non-judicial foreclosure than other states. This paper summaries the cases since 2000 and discusses the three major decisions that the Supreme Court of Nevada made involving SPLs' non-judicial constitutionality, tender-extinguishing SPLs, and federal creditors' role in SPLs.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":42793,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Japan Architectural Review\",\"volume\":\"6 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/2475-8876.12382\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Japan Architectural Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/2475-8876.12382\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"ARCHITECTURE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Japan Architectural Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/2475-8876.12382","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ARCHITECTURE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这篇文章的重点是超级优先留置权(SPLs),它允许房主协会取消房屋抵押贷款的抵押品赎回权。到目前为止,已有22个州实施了这种留置权,希望平衡抵押债权人和房主协会的利益。与其他州相比,内华达州一直面临着来自抵押债权人和房主协会的更多挑战,这些挑战涉及非司法性止赎的合宪性。本文对2000年以来的案例进行了总结,并讨论了内华达州最高法院做出的三个主要裁决,涉及SPLs的非司法合宪性、消灭投标的SPLs以及联邦债权人在SPLs中的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Super-priority lien challenged for its state constitutionality in the United States of America

Super-priority lien challenged for its state constitutionality in the United States of America

This note focuses on super-priority liens (SPLs), which allow homeowner associations to foreclose a property over its mortgage. Twenty-two states have so far implemented such liens, hoping to balance the interests of mortgage creditors and homeowner associations. The state of Nevada has been facing more challenges from both mortgage creditors and homeowner associations regarding the constitutionality of non-judicial foreclosure than other states. This paper summaries the cases since 2000 and discusses the three major decisions that the Supreme Court of Nevada made involving SPLs' non-judicial constitutionality, tender-extinguishing SPLs, and federal creditors' role in SPLs.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
11.10%
发文量
58
审稿时长
15 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信