B. Merks, W. Frencken, A. R. Den Otter, Michael Brink
{"title":"利用小型足球比赛的位置数据量化方向负荷的变化","authors":"B. Merks, W. Frencken, A. R. Den Otter, Michael Brink","doi":"10.1080/24733938.2021.1912382","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Rapid changes in velocity and direction place high mechanical loads on players, but are ignored in commonly used load indicators. Purpose Quantifying change of direction (COD) load through positional data from small-sided games (SSG) and assess its criterion and construct validity. Methods Elite male youth soccer players (n = 25, 16.8 ± 1.3 years) played three SSG (5v5, 5×4 min) with different field dimensions (small [40×30 m], medium [55×38 m], large [70×45 m]). Positional data of the players was obtained with a Local Position Measurement system. COD load (AU) was quantified based on the combination of velocity and change in heading direction. Additionally, total distance covered, running distance, acceleration count, deceleration count, and Rating of Perceived Exertion were measured. Criterion validity was assessed by correlating COD load and the load indicators. Construct validity was determined by testing the differences between the SSG field dimensions. Results Strong correlations were determined between COD load and total distance covered (r = 0.74, p < .01) and running distance (r = 0.84, p < .01). Middle and large field size resulted in highest COD load (p < .05). Conclusion These results suggest that the COD load measure shows sufficient criterion and construct validity.","PeriodicalId":48512,"journal":{"name":"Science and Medicine in Football","volume":"6 1","pages":"234 - 240"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/24733938.2021.1912382","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Quantifying change of direction load using positional data from small-sided games in soccer\",\"authors\":\"B. Merks, W. Frencken, A. R. Den Otter, Michael Brink\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/24733938.2021.1912382\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Rapid changes in velocity and direction place high mechanical loads on players, but are ignored in commonly used load indicators. Purpose Quantifying change of direction (COD) load through positional data from small-sided games (SSG) and assess its criterion and construct validity. Methods Elite male youth soccer players (n = 25, 16.8 ± 1.3 years) played three SSG (5v5, 5×4 min) with different field dimensions (small [40×30 m], medium [55×38 m], large [70×45 m]). Positional data of the players was obtained with a Local Position Measurement system. COD load (AU) was quantified based on the combination of velocity and change in heading direction. Additionally, total distance covered, running distance, acceleration count, deceleration count, and Rating of Perceived Exertion were measured. Criterion validity was assessed by correlating COD load and the load indicators. Construct validity was determined by testing the differences between the SSG field dimensions. Results Strong correlations were determined between COD load and total distance covered (r = 0.74, p < .01) and running distance (r = 0.84, p < .01). Middle and large field size resulted in highest COD load (p < .05). Conclusion These results suggest that the COD load measure shows sufficient criterion and construct validity.\",\"PeriodicalId\":48512,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Science and Medicine in Football\",\"volume\":\"6 1\",\"pages\":\"234 - 240\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-04-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/24733938.2021.1912382\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Science and Medicine in Football\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/24733938.2021.1912382\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SPORT SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Science and Medicine in Football","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/24733938.2021.1912382","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Quantifying change of direction load using positional data from small-sided games in soccer
ABSTRACT Rapid changes in velocity and direction place high mechanical loads on players, but are ignored in commonly used load indicators. Purpose Quantifying change of direction (COD) load through positional data from small-sided games (SSG) and assess its criterion and construct validity. Methods Elite male youth soccer players (n = 25, 16.8 ± 1.3 years) played three SSG (5v5, 5×4 min) with different field dimensions (small [40×30 m], medium [55×38 m], large [70×45 m]). Positional data of the players was obtained with a Local Position Measurement system. COD load (AU) was quantified based on the combination of velocity and change in heading direction. Additionally, total distance covered, running distance, acceleration count, deceleration count, and Rating of Perceived Exertion were measured. Criterion validity was assessed by correlating COD load and the load indicators. Construct validity was determined by testing the differences between the SSG field dimensions. Results Strong correlations were determined between COD load and total distance covered (r = 0.74, p < .01) and running distance (r = 0.84, p < .01). Middle and large field size resulted in highest COD load (p < .05). Conclusion These results suggest that the COD load measure shows sufficient criterion and construct validity.