马克·费舍尔怪异、诡异的退出教育学

IF 1.9 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Nicholas Stock
{"title":"马克·费舍尔怪异、诡异的退出教育学","authors":"Nicholas Stock","doi":"10.1080/14681366.2021.1949384","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Since the death of cultural critic Mark Fisher and the posthumous release of his final lectures Postcapitalist Desire, conversation surrounding his teaching and pedagogy has started to arise. This article thus seeks to (partly) formalise Fisher’s pedagogy into concepts that might contribute to broader pedagogical discourse. Building on and ultimately moving beyond the school of critical pedagogy, I examine the way Fisher’s pedagogy seeks to exit a state of capitalist realism and cultural inertia, something that can be achieved by a range of strategies such as attuning to weird and eerie affects, raising/razing consciousness and experimenting with medium. Ultimately, these examples raise concerns about the very nature of pedagogy itself and thus, in line with Fisher’s desire to exit capitalist realism, posit the question whether pedagogy needs exiting too. Formalisation of his pedagogy therefore always remains problematic.","PeriodicalId":46617,"journal":{"name":"Pedagogy Culture and Society","volume":"31 1","pages":"775 - 791"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/14681366.2021.1949384","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The weird, eerie, exit pedagogy of Mark Fisher\",\"authors\":\"Nicholas Stock\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/14681366.2021.1949384\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Since the death of cultural critic Mark Fisher and the posthumous release of his final lectures Postcapitalist Desire, conversation surrounding his teaching and pedagogy has started to arise. This article thus seeks to (partly) formalise Fisher’s pedagogy into concepts that might contribute to broader pedagogical discourse. Building on and ultimately moving beyond the school of critical pedagogy, I examine the way Fisher’s pedagogy seeks to exit a state of capitalist realism and cultural inertia, something that can be achieved by a range of strategies such as attuning to weird and eerie affects, raising/razing consciousness and experimenting with medium. Ultimately, these examples raise concerns about the very nature of pedagogy itself and thus, in line with Fisher’s desire to exit capitalist realism, posit the question whether pedagogy needs exiting too. Formalisation of his pedagogy therefore always remains problematic.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46617,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pedagogy Culture and Society\",\"volume\":\"31 1\",\"pages\":\"775 - 791\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-07-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/14681366.2021.1949384\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pedagogy Culture and Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/14681366.2021.1949384\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pedagogy Culture and Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14681366.2021.1949384","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

摘要自从文化评论家马克·费舍尔去世,他的最后一篇演讲《后资本主义的欲望》在他去世后发表以来,围绕他的教学和教育学的话题开始出现。因此,本文试图(部分)将费舍尔的教育学正式化为可能有助于更广泛的教育话语的概念。在批判教育学的基础上,并最终超越批判教育学,我研究了费舍尔的教育学如何寻求摆脱资本主义现实主义和文化惰性的状态,这可以通过一系列策略来实现,例如适应怪异和怪诞的影响,提高/消除意识和尝试媒介。最终,这些例子引发了人们对教育学本身本质的担忧,因此,根据费舍尔退出资本主义现实主义的愿望,提出了教育学是否也需要退出的问题。因此,他的教学法的形式化始终存在问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The weird, eerie, exit pedagogy of Mark Fisher
ABSTRACT Since the death of cultural critic Mark Fisher and the posthumous release of his final lectures Postcapitalist Desire, conversation surrounding his teaching and pedagogy has started to arise. This article thus seeks to (partly) formalise Fisher’s pedagogy into concepts that might contribute to broader pedagogical discourse. Building on and ultimately moving beyond the school of critical pedagogy, I examine the way Fisher’s pedagogy seeks to exit a state of capitalist realism and cultural inertia, something that can be achieved by a range of strategies such as attuning to weird and eerie affects, raising/razing consciousness and experimenting with medium. Ultimately, these examples raise concerns about the very nature of pedagogy itself and thus, in line with Fisher’s desire to exit capitalist realism, posit the question whether pedagogy needs exiting too. Formalisation of his pedagogy therefore always remains problematic.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Pedagogy Culture and Society
Pedagogy Culture and Society EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
10.00%
发文量
40
期刊介绍: Pedagogy, Culture & Society is a fully-refereed international journal that seeks to provide an international forum for pedagogy discussion and debate. The identity of the journal is built on the belief that pedagogy debate has the following features: •Pedagogy debate is not restricted by geographical boundaries: its participants are the international educational community and its proceedings appeal to a worldwide audience. •Pedagogy debate is open and democratic: it is not the preserve of teachers, politicians, academics or administrators but requires open discussion.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信