学生在期末硕士项目结构设计中遇到的困难和解决方法

IF 2 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Antonio Delgado, E. Justo, Domenico Terranova, J. Cascales
{"title":"学生在期末硕士项目结构设计中遇到的困难和解决方法","authors":"Antonio Delgado, E. Justo, Domenico Terranova, J. Cascales","doi":"10.1080/03043797.2023.2176742","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT What difficulties do architecture students encounter in the structural design for their final master project? How do they address these difficulties? This paper presents the topic and focuses on these two research questions by examining the students’ experience, using thematic analysis with a qualitative approach. We obtained the data through surveys administered to architecture students during their final master project. The results show 11 categories of students’ difficulties in designing the structure. The five most frequent are integration between structure and architecture, pre-sizing, long spans, complex geometries and floor systems. To deal with their difficulties, the students employed seven strategies, which we have grouped into three components: documentary, social and experimental. We found that the final master project students participating in our study possessed and practiced the following skills: self-directed learning, constructive investigation with problem-solving skills and positive social interaction. This study can help instructors understand the difficulties faced by the students learning structural design in the context of real world, authentic projects. Our findings confirm the positive effects of social learning, analogical thinking and design alternatives for structural design education.","PeriodicalId":47348,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Engineering Education","volume":"48 1","pages":"518 - 537"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Students’ difficulties and remedies with the structural design for their final master project\",\"authors\":\"Antonio Delgado, E. Justo, Domenico Terranova, J. Cascales\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/03043797.2023.2176742\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT What difficulties do architecture students encounter in the structural design for their final master project? How do they address these difficulties? This paper presents the topic and focuses on these two research questions by examining the students’ experience, using thematic analysis with a qualitative approach. We obtained the data through surveys administered to architecture students during their final master project. The results show 11 categories of students’ difficulties in designing the structure. The five most frequent are integration between structure and architecture, pre-sizing, long spans, complex geometries and floor systems. To deal with their difficulties, the students employed seven strategies, which we have grouped into three components: documentary, social and experimental. We found that the final master project students participating in our study possessed and practiced the following skills: self-directed learning, constructive investigation with problem-solving skills and positive social interaction. This study can help instructors understand the difficulties faced by the students learning structural design in the context of real world, authentic projects. Our findings confirm the positive effects of social learning, analogical thinking and design alternatives for structural design education.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47348,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Engineering Education\",\"volume\":\"48 1\",\"pages\":\"518 - 537\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-02-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Engineering Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/03043797.2023.2176742\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Engineering Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/03043797.2023.2176742","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要:建筑学专业的学生在最后一个硕士项目的结构设计中会遇到哪些困难?他们如何解决这些困难?本文提出了这一主题,并通过考察学生的经历,采用定性的主题分析方法,重点研究了这两个研究问题。我们通过对建筑学学生在最后一个硕士项目中进行的调查获得了数据。结果显示了11类学生在结构设计方面的困难。五种最常见的是结构和建筑之间的集成、预确定尺寸、长跨度、复杂的几何形状和地板系统。为了解决他们的困难,学生们采用了七种策略,我们将其分为三个部分:纪实、社交和实验。我们发现,参与我们研究的最终硕士项目学生拥有并实践了以下技能:自主学习、具有解决问题能力的建设性调查和积极的社会互动。本研究可以帮助教师了解学生在真实世界、真实项目的背景下学习结构设计所面临的困难。我们的研究结果证实了社会学习、类比思维和设计替代方案对结构设计教育的积极影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Students’ difficulties and remedies with the structural design for their final master project
ABSTRACT What difficulties do architecture students encounter in the structural design for their final master project? How do they address these difficulties? This paper presents the topic and focuses on these two research questions by examining the students’ experience, using thematic analysis with a qualitative approach. We obtained the data through surveys administered to architecture students during their final master project. The results show 11 categories of students’ difficulties in designing the structure. The five most frequent are integration between structure and architecture, pre-sizing, long spans, complex geometries and floor systems. To deal with their difficulties, the students employed seven strategies, which we have grouped into three components: documentary, social and experimental. We found that the final master project students participating in our study possessed and practiced the following skills: self-directed learning, constructive investigation with problem-solving skills and positive social interaction. This study can help instructors understand the difficulties faced by the students learning structural design in the context of real world, authentic projects. Our findings confirm the positive effects of social learning, analogical thinking and design alternatives for structural design education.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
European Journal of Engineering Education
European Journal of Engineering Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
13.00%
发文量
64
期刊介绍: European Journal of Engineering Education is published six times a year in print and electronic editions and provides an essential forum for dialogue between researchers and specialists in the field of engineering education, at European and worldwide levels. European Journal of Engineering Education is the Official Journal of SEFI, the Socièté Européenne pour la Formation des Ingénieurs (the European Society for Engineering Education). SEFI is a non-governmental organization whose aims are to develop information about engineering education, to improve communication and exchange between professors, researchers and students and to promote cooperation between the various institutions concerned with engineering education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信