殉道、暴力和尊严

IF 0.1 0 RELIGION
Alease A. Brown
{"title":"殉道、暴力和尊严","authors":"Alease A. Brown","doi":"10.22351/ET.V59I1.3618","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article reconsiders historically based arguments for Christian martyrdom, subjecting the tradition to an analysis suited to liberation of the marginalized. It begins with a description of the historical development of scholarship on martyrdom. From there, the essay analyzes Moss’s arguments regarding the discursive use of the image of the martyr, alongside Recla’s arguments regarding the Christian martyr as autothanatos, one who enacts self-death. Moss and Recla demonstrate the simultaneous fabrication and erasure of violence from the narratives of martyrdom. The article reconciles these opposing conclusions by applying the contextual lens of honor/shame to the analysis of martyrdom. Doing so reveals that, more than attempts to emphasize violence and/or suffering, martyrs, as culturally marginalized persons, represent for early Christians, the ideal Christian life--attitude of the marginalized, which is that of making radical claims of and to human dignity.","PeriodicalId":53914,"journal":{"name":"Estudos Teologicos","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Martyrdom, violence, and dignity\",\"authors\":\"Alease A. Brown\",\"doi\":\"10.22351/ET.V59I1.3618\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article reconsiders historically based arguments for Christian martyrdom, subjecting the tradition to an analysis suited to liberation of the marginalized. It begins with a description of the historical development of scholarship on martyrdom. From there, the essay analyzes Moss’s arguments regarding the discursive use of the image of the martyr, alongside Recla’s arguments regarding the Christian martyr as autothanatos, one who enacts self-death. Moss and Recla demonstrate the simultaneous fabrication and erasure of violence from the narratives of martyrdom. The article reconciles these opposing conclusions by applying the contextual lens of honor/shame to the analysis of martyrdom. Doing so reveals that, more than attempts to emphasize violence and/or suffering, martyrs, as culturally marginalized persons, represent for early Christians, the ideal Christian life--attitude of the marginalized, which is that of making radical claims of and to human dignity.\",\"PeriodicalId\":53914,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Estudos Teologicos\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-07-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Estudos Teologicos\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22351/ET.V59I1.3618\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"RELIGION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Estudos Teologicos","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22351/ET.V59I1.3618","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这篇文章重新考虑了基于历史的基督教殉难的论点,使传统的分析适合于边缘化的解放。它首先描述了关于殉难的学术研究的历史发展。在此基础上,本文分析了莫斯对殉道者形象的论述,以及克莱拉关于基督教殉道者是自我死亡者(autothanatos)的论述。莫斯和克莱拉展示了在殉道的叙述中,暴力是同时被捏造和抹去的。这篇文章通过运用荣誉/耻辱的语境镜头来分析殉道,调和了这些相反的结论。这样做表明,作为文化边缘化的人,殉道者比试图强调暴力和/或痛苦更能代表早期基督徒的理想基督徒生活——边缘化的态度,即对人类尊严提出激进的要求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Martyrdom, violence, and dignity
This article reconsiders historically based arguments for Christian martyrdom, subjecting the tradition to an analysis suited to liberation of the marginalized. It begins with a description of the historical development of scholarship on martyrdom. From there, the essay analyzes Moss’s arguments regarding the discursive use of the image of the martyr, alongside Recla’s arguments regarding the Christian martyr as autothanatos, one who enacts self-death. Moss and Recla demonstrate the simultaneous fabrication and erasure of violence from the narratives of martyrdom. The article reconciles these opposing conclusions by applying the contextual lens of honor/shame to the analysis of martyrdom. Doing so reveals that, more than attempts to emphasize violence and/or suffering, martyrs, as culturally marginalized persons, represent for early Christians, the ideal Christian life--attitude of the marginalized, which is that of making radical claims of and to human dignity.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Estudos Teologicos
Estudos Teologicos RELIGION-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信