罗西BSHEER。档案战争:沙特阿拉伯的历史政治。斯坦福:斯坦福大学出版社,2020。416页。30.00美元,平装书。ISBN 9781503612570。

IF 0.2 Q3 AREA STUDIES
Guy Burak
{"title":"罗西BSHEER。档案战争:沙特阿拉伯的历史政治。斯坦福:斯坦福大学出版社,2020。416页。30.00美元,平装书。ISBN 9781503612570。","authors":"Guy Burak","doi":"10.1017/rms.2021.42","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"geographicalbased segregation by linking such projects to colonialism. Nonetheless, these models were viewed as beneficial by opposing camps who considered education reform as an opportunity for the production of ideal Iraqi women. Iraq’s educational development emerged from a colonial-linearity that aimed to yield specific subjects: its opposition evidently indicates that Iraqi women ‘believed they could better serve the nation’s interest by overthrowing the existing political order than by learning how to efficiently manage a household’ (105). The state of scholarship on Iraq is such that very few studies have consulted the country’s rich archives or conducted research within its borders. Of course, Pursley anticipated this otherwise minor critique by noting that the ‘very limited state of scholarship on Iraq means that many available sources remain unexamined and many of those that have been examined remain open to alternate readings’ (28). Familiar Future will interest scholars engaged with economic development projects, gender studies, postcolonial studies, national imaginaries, and the manufacturing of subjectivity. In a Koselleckian tradition, Pursley not only offers us a tantalizing critique of modernization and modernity, but also challenges us to rethink the boundaries between history, historiography and theory: an opportunity to reflect on the positioning of the history of Iraq within interdisciplinary theories.","PeriodicalId":21066,"journal":{"name":"Review of Middle East Studies","volume":"55 1","pages":"189 - 191"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"13","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"ROSIE BSHEER. Archive Wars: The Politics of History in Saudi Arabia. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2020. Pp. 416. $30.00, paperback. ISBN 9781503612570.\",\"authors\":\"Guy Burak\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/rms.2021.42\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"geographicalbased segregation by linking such projects to colonialism. Nonetheless, these models were viewed as beneficial by opposing camps who considered education reform as an opportunity for the production of ideal Iraqi women. Iraq’s educational development emerged from a colonial-linearity that aimed to yield specific subjects: its opposition evidently indicates that Iraqi women ‘believed they could better serve the nation’s interest by overthrowing the existing political order than by learning how to efficiently manage a household’ (105). The state of scholarship on Iraq is such that very few studies have consulted the country’s rich archives or conducted research within its borders. Of course, Pursley anticipated this otherwise minor critique by noting that the ‘very limited state of scholarship on Iraq means that many available sources remain unexamined and many of those that have been examined remain open to alternate readings’ (28). Familiar Future will interest scholars engaged with economic development projects, gender studies, postcolonial studies, national imaginaries, and the manufacturing of subjectivity. In a Koselleckian tradition, Pursley not only offers us a tantalizing critique of modernization and modernity, but also challenges us to rethink the boundaries between history, historiography and theory: an opportunity to reflect on the positioning of the history of Iraq within interdisciplinary theories.\",\"PeriodicalId\":21066,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Review of Middle East Studies\",\"volume\":\"55 1\",\"pages\":\"189 - 191\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"13\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Review of Middle East Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/rms.2021.42\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"AREA STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Review of Middle East Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/rms.2021.42","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"AREA STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 13

摘要

通过将此类项目与殖民主义联系起来,实现基于地理的隔离。尽管如此,反对阵营认为这些模式是有益的,他们认为教育改革是培养理想伊拉克妇女的机会。伊拉克的教育发展源于一种旨在培养特定科目的殖民线性:它的反对显然表明,伊拉克妇女“相信推翻现有政治秩序比学习如何有效管理家庭更能为国家利益服务”(105)。伊拉克的学术状况如此之好,以至于很少有研究查阅该国丰富的档案或在其境内进行研究。当然,帕斯利预见到了这一次要的批评,他指出,“关于伊拉克的学术状况非常有限,这意味着许多可用的资料来源仍然未经审查,许多已审查的资料仍然可以供其他阅读”(28)。《熟悉的未来》将吸引从事经济发展项目、性别研究、后殖民研究、国家想象和主体性制造的学者。在科塞勒克传统中,帕斯利不仅为我们提供了一个对现代化和现代性的诱人批判,而且还挑战我们重新思考历史、史学和理论之间的界限:一个在跨学科理论中反思伊拉克历史定位的机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
ROSIE BSHEER. Archive Wars: The Politics of History in Saudi Arabia. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2020. Pp. 416. $30.00, paperback. ISBN 9781503612570.
geographicalbased segregation by linking such projects to colonialism. Nonetheless, these models were viewed as beneficial by opposing camps who considered education reform as an opportunity for the production of ideal Iraqi women. Iraq’s educational development emerged from a colonial-linearity that aimed to yield specific subjects: its opposition evidently indicates that Iraqi women ‘believed they could better serve the nation’s interest by overthrowing the existing political order than by learning how to efficiently manage a household’ (105). The state of scholarship on Iraq is such that very few studies have consulted the country’s rich archives or conducted research within its borders. Of course, Pursley anticipated this otherwise minor critique by noting that the ‘very limited state of scholarship on Iraq means that many available sources remain unexamined and many of those that have been examined remain open to alternate readings’ (28). Familiar Future will interest scholars engaged with economic development projects, gender studies, postcolonial studies, national imaginaries, and the manufacturing of subjectivity. In a Koselleckian tradition, Pursley not only offers us a tantalizing critique of modernization and modernity, but also challenges us to rethink the boundaries between history, historiography and theory: an opportunity to reflect on the positioning of the history of Iraq within interdisciplinary theories.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信