现场交通条件下基于灵活车道分配和预留的交叉口组合控制

IF 3.6 2区 工程技术 Q2 TRANSPORTATION
Farzaneh Azadi , Nikola Mitrovic , Aleksandar Z. Stevanovic
{"title":"现场交通条件下基于灵活车道分配和预留的交叉口组合控制","authors":"Farzaneh Azadi ,&nbsp;Nikola Mitrovic ,&nbsp;Aleksandar Z. Stevanovic","doi":"10.1080/23249935.2022.2119113","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>A concept called Combined Alternate-Direction Lane Assignment and Reservation-based Intersection Control (CADLARIC) was recently proposed for better management of directionally unrestricted traffic flows in a Connected and Autonomous Vehicles (CAVs) environment. In CADLARIC, vehicles must position themselves in a proper lane before they reach the downstream intersection, which enables the resolution of vehicular conflicts both between intersections and, as traditionally, within the intersection boxes. CADLARIC has shown very promising results, but it is quite infrastructurally demanding, requiring six lanes per intersection approach. To overcome this problem, we propose here Combined Flexible Lane Assignment and Reservation-based Intersection Control (CFLARIC), a more robust concept that offers a full spectrum of lane assignment possibilities in combination with the appropriate reservation-based intersection control. Three distinctive CFLARIC strategies are tested on a simulated three-intersection corridor from West Valley City, Utah. The efficiency and safety performance of the proposed CFLARIC scenarios are evaluated through a comparison with Fixed-Time Control (FTC) and Full Reservation-based Intersection Control (FRIC), both with conventional lane assignments. The results illustrate that CFLARIC scenarios: (i) outperform FTC and FRIC in terms of efficiency (delay and number of stops), and (ii) improve overall safety (by reducing a number of conflicting situations) when compared to FRIC. The findings of this study prove that flexible control concepts such as CFLARIC have a great potential to improve safety and efficiency in future CAV environment. Future research needs to define under which conditions and how the proposed concept could be partially implemented in field operations.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48871,"journal":{"name":"Transportmetrica A-Transport Science","volume":"20 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Combined flexible lane assignment and reservation-based intersection control in field-like traffic conditions\",\"authors\":\"Farzaneh Azadi ,&nbsp;Nikola Mitrovic ,&nbsp;Aleksandar Z. Stevanovic\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/23249935.2022.2119113\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>A concept called Combined Alternate-Direction Lane Assignment and Reservation-based Intersection Control (CADLARIC) was recently proposed for better management of directionally unrestricted traffic flows in a Connected and Autonomous Vehicles (CAVs) environment. In CADLARIC, vehicles must position themselves in a proper lane before they reach the downstream intersection, which enables the resolution of vehicular conflicts both between intersections and, as traditionally, within the intersection boxes. CADLARIC has shown very promising results, but it is quite infrastructurally demanding, requiring six lanes per intersection approach. To overcome this problem, we propose here Combined Flexible Lane Assignment and Reservation-based Intersection Control (CFLARIC), a more robust concept that offers a full spectrum of lane assignment possibilities in combination with the appropriate reservation-based intersection control. Three distinctive CFLARIC strategies are tested on a simulated three-intersection corridor from West Valley City, Utah. The efficiency and safety performance of the proposed CFLARIC scenarios are evaluated through a comparison with Fixed-Time Control (FTC) and Full Reservation-based Intersection Control (FRIC), both with conventional lane assignments. The results illustrate that CFLARIC scenarios: (i) outperform FTC and FRIC in terms of efficiency (delay and number of stops), and (ii) improve overall safety (by reducing a number of conflicting situations) when compared to FRIC. The findings of this study prove that flexible control concepts such as CFLARIC have a great potential to improve safety and efficiency in future CAV environment. Future research needs to define under which conditions and how the proposed concept could be partially implemented in field operations.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48871,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Transportmetrica A-Transport Science\",\"volume\":\"20 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Transportmetrica A-Transport Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/org/science/article/pii/S2324993523000088\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"TRANSPORTATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transportmetrica A-Transport Science","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/org/science/article/pii/S2324993523000088","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"TRANSPORTATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

为了更好地管理互联和自动驾驶汽车(CAV)环境中方向不受限制的交通流,最近提出了一种名为 "基于交叉口控制的组合式交替方向车道分配和预留(CADLARIC)"的概念。在 CADLARIC 中,车辆必须在到达下游交叉路口之前将自己定位在适当的车道上,这样就能解决交叉路口之间以及传统上交叉路口内的车辆冲突。CADLARIC 已显示出非常有前途的结果,但它对基础设施的要求很高,每个交叉路口进路需要六条车道。为了克服这个问题,我们在这里提出了灵活车道分配和基于预留的交叉口控制相结合的概念(CFLARIC),这是一个更稳健的概念,结合适当的基于预留的交叉口控制,提供全方位的车道分配可能性。在犹他州西谷市的一个模拟三交叉口走廊上测试了三种不同的 CFLARIC 策略。通过与固定时间控制(FTC)和完全基于预留的交叉口控制(FRIC)(均采用传统的车道分配)进行比较,对所提出的 CFLARIC 方案的效率和安全性能进行了评估。结果表明,CFLARIC 方案(i) 在效率(延迟和停车次数)方面优于 FTC 和 FRIC,(ii) 与 FRIC 相比,提高了整体安全性(减少了许多冲突情况)。本研究的结果证明,CFLARIC 等灵活控制概念在提高未来 CAV 环境的安全性和效率方面具有巨大潜力。未来的研究需要确定在哪些条件下以及如何在实地操作中部分实施所提出的概念。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Combined flexible lane assignment and reservation-based intersection control in field-like traffic conditions

A concept called Combined Alternate-Direction Lane Assignment and Reservation-based Intersection Control (CADLARIC) was recently proposed for better management of directionally unrestricted traffic flows in a Connected and Autonomous Vehicles (CAVs) environment. In CADLARIC, vehicles must position themselves in a proper lane before they reach the downstream intersection, which enables the resolution of vehicular conflicts both between intersections and, as traditionally, within the intersection boxes. CADLARIC has shown very promising results, but it is quite infrastructurally demanding, requiring six lanes per intersection approach. To overcome this problem, we propose here Combined Flexible Lane Assignment and Reservation-based Intersection Control (CFLARIC), a more robust concept that offers a full spectrum of lane assignment possibilities in combination with the appropriate reservation-based intersection control. Three distinctive CFLARIC strategies are tested on a simulated three-intersection corridor from West Valley City, Utah. The efficiency and safety performance of the proposed CFLARIC scenarios are evaluated through a comparison with Fixed-Time Control (FTC) and Full Reservation-based Intersection Control (FRIC), both with conventional lane assignments. The results illustrate that CFLARIC scenarios: (i) outperform FTC and FRIC in terms of efficiency (delay and number of stops), and (ii) improve overall safety (by reducing a number of conflicting situations) when compared to FRIC. The findings of this study prove that flexible control concepts such as CFLARIC have a great potential to improve safety and efficiency in future CAV environment. Future research needs to define under which conditions and how the proposed concept could be partially implemented in field operations.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Transportmetrica A-Transport Science
Transportmetrica A-Transport Science TRANSPORTATION SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY-
CiteScore
8.10
自引率
12.10%
发文量
55
期刊介绍: Transportmetrica A provides a forum for original discourse in transport science. The international journal''s focus is on the scientific approach to transport research methodology and empirical analysis of moving people and goods. Papers related to all aspects of transportation are welcome. A rigorous peer review that involves editor screening and anonymous refereeing for submitted articles facilitates quality output.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信