地价能否抑制城市工业用地扩张?从生产中土地可替代性角度的解释

IF 2.9 3区 工程技术 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
Aidong Zhao, Jinsheng Huang, H. Ploegmakers, Jing Lan, Erwin van der Krabbene, Xianlei Ma
{"title":"地价能否抑制城市工业用地扩张?从生产中土地可替代性角度的解释","authors":"Aidong Zhao, Jinsheng Huang, H. Ploegmakers, Jing Lan, Erwin van der Krabbene, Xianlei Ma","doi":"10.1080/12265934.2022.2063159","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Industrial land expansion has become a matter of increasing concern to policy-makers, especially in developing and emerging manufacturing countries. Price mechanisms are regarded as an important way to control the expansion of industrial land. For industrial land, the effectiveness of a price mechanism in controlling land expansion relies substantially on the substitutability of land in production, which remains unclear in the literature. This paper provides empirical evidence on the substitutability of industrial land by examining the impact of increases in land prices on the elasticity of substitution between land input and other production factors based on China’s city-level industrial production in 2007–2015. We find that land price increases significantly induce the industrial sector to reduce land demand by substituting capital for land. However, our estimated elasticity of substitution of capital for land in production is only 0.03, which indicates that industrial land is substitutable but the degree of substitutability is very low in production. The findings of our study suggest that the benefits of relying on price mechanisms to curb industrial land expansion may be very limited; hence, traditional planning instruments should also be suitably designed to jointly curb industrial land expansion.","PeriodicalId":46464,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Urban Sciences","volume":"26 1","pages":"651 - 671"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Can land prices be used to curb urban industrial land expansion? An explanation from the perspective of substitutability of land in production\",\"authors\":\"Aidong Zhao, Jinsheng Huang, H. Ploegmakers, Jing Lan, Erwin van der Krabbene, Xianlei Ma\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/12265934.2022.2063159\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Industrial land expansion has become a matter of increasing concern to policy-makers, especially in developing and emerging manufacturing countries. Price mechanisms are regarded as an important way to control the expansion of industrial land. For industrial land, the effectiveness of a price mechanism in controlling land expansion relies substantially on the substitutability of land in production, which remains unclear in the literature. This paper provides empirical evidence on the substitutability of industrial land by examining the impact of increases in land prices on the elasticity of substitution between land input and other production factors based on China’s city-level industrial production in 2007–2015. We find that land price increases significantly induce the industrial sector to reduce land demand by substituting capital for land. However, our estimated elasticity of substitution of capital for land in production is only 0.03, which indicates that industrial land is substitutable but the degree of substitutability is very low in production. The findings of our study suggest that the benefits of relying on price mechanisms to curb industrial land expansion may be very limited; hence, traditional planning instruments should also be suitably designed to jointly curb industrial land expansion.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46464,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Urban Sciences\",\"volume\":\"26 1\",\"pages\":\"651 - 671\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-04-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Urban Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/12265934.2022.2063159\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Urban Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/12265934.2022.2063159","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

工业用地扩张已成为决策者日益关注的问题,特别是在发展中国家和新兴制造业国家。价格机制被认为是控制工业用地扩张的重要手段。对于工业用地,价格机制在控制土地扩张方面的有效性在很大程度上依赖于土地在生产中的可替代性,这一点在文献中仍不清楚。本文以2007-2015年中国城市工业生产为样本,考察了土地价格上涨对土地投入与其他生产要素之间替代弹性的影响,为工业用地可替代性提供了实证证据。研究发现,土地价格上涨显著诱导工业部门通过资本替代土地来减少土地需求。然而,我们估计的生产中资本对土地的替代弹性仅为0.03,这表明工业用地在生产中具有可替代性,但可替代性程度很低。研究结果表明,依靠价格机制抑制工业用地扩张的效益可能非常有限;因此,也应适当设计传统的规划工具,共同抑制工业用地的扩张。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Can land prices be used to curb urban industrial land expansion? An explanation from the perspective of substitutability of land in production
Abstract Industrial land expansion has become a matter of increasing concern to policy-makers, especially in developing and emerging manufacturing countries. Price mechanisms are regarded as an important way to control the expansion of industrial land. For industrial land, the effectiveness of a price mechanism in controlling land expansion relies substantially on the substitutability of land in production, which remains unclear in the literature. This paper provides empirical evidence on the substitutability of industrial land by examining the impact of increases in land prices on the elasticity of substitution between land input and other production factors based on China’s city-level industrial production in 2007–2015. We find that land price increases significantly induce the industrial sector to reduce land demand by substituting capital for land. However, our estimated elasticity of substitution of capital for land in production is only 0.03, which indicates that industrial land is substitutable but the degree of substitutability is very low in production. The findings of our study suggest that the benefits of relying on price mechanisms to curb industrial land expansion may be very limited; hence, traditional planning instruments should also be suitably designed to jointly curb industrial land expansion.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
6.90%
发文量
36
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信