使用鼠标跟踪识别强迫选择人格项目的欺骗

IF 2.6 3区管理学 Q2 DEVELOPMENT STUDIES

Public Administration and Development Pub Date : 2021-05-01 DOI:10.25035/PAD.2021.01.005

I. Kuzmich, Charles A. Scherbaum

{"title":"使用鼠标跟踪识别强迫选择人格项目的欺骗","authors":"I. Kuzmich, Charles A. Scherbaum","doi":"10.25035/PAD.2021.01.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This research utilizes mouse tracking as a potential behavioral method to examine cognitive processes underlying faking on forced-choice personality inventories. Mouse tracking is a method from social categorization research that captures a variety of metrics related to motor movements, which are linked to cognitive processing. To explore the utility of this method, we examined differences in the mouse tracking metrics of those instructed to respond honestly or to fake. Our findings show that there is a distinguishable difference in the behavioral response of those who are faking when responding to pairs of personality descriptors presented in a forced-choice format compared to those who are responding honestly. Implications and contributions of this study include insights into the cognitive processing that can occur while responding to personality items when respondents are faking and a demonstration of how mouse tracking methods can be used to detect faking.","PeriodicalId":39679,"journal":{"name":"Public Administration and Development","volume":"7 1","pages":"5"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Identifying Faking on Forced-Choice Personality Items Using Mouse Tracking\",\"authors\":\"I. Kuzmich, Charles A. Scherbaum\",\"doi\":\"10.25035/PAD.2021.01.005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This research utilizes mouse tracking as a potential behavioral method to examine cognitive processes underlying faking on forced-choice personality inventories. Mouse tracking is a method from social categorization research that captures a variety of metrics related to motor movements, which are linked to cognitive processing. To explore the utility of this method, we examined differences in the mouse tracking metrics of those instructed to respond honestly or to fake. Our findings show that there is a distinguishable difference in the behavioral response of those who are faking when responding to pairs of personality descriptors presented in a forced-choice format compared to those who are responding honestly. Implications and contributions of this study include insights into the cognitive processing that can occur while responding to personality items when respondents are faking and a demonstration of how mouse tracking methods can be used to detect faking.\",\"PeriodicalId\":39679,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Public Administration and Development\",\"volume\":\"7 1\",\"pages\":\"5\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Public Administration and Development\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.25035/PAD.2021.01.005\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"DEVELOPMENT STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Public Administration and Development","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25035/PAD.2021.01.005","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DEVELOPMENT STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1

摘要

这项研究利用鼠标追踪作为一种潜在的行为方法来检验在强迫选择人格清单上造假的认知过程。鼠标跟踪是社会分类研究中的一种方法，它捕捉了与运动相关的各种指标，这些指标与认知处理有关。为了探索这种方法的实用性，我们检查了那些被指示诚实回应或虚假回应的人的鼠标跟踪指标的差异。我们的研究结果表明，与诚实回应的人相比，那些在回应以强迫选择形式呈现的成对人格描述符时假装的人的行为反应存在明显差异。这项研究的意义和贡献包括深入了解受访者在伪装时对个性项目做出反应时可能发生的认知过程，以及如何使用鼠标跟踪方法来检测伪装。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Identifying Faking on Forced-Choice Personality Items Using Mouse Tracking

This research utilizes mouse tracking as a potential behavioral method to examine cognitive processes underlying faking on forced-choice personality inventories. Mouse tracking is a method from social categorization research that captures a variety of metrics related to motor movements, which are linked to cognitive processing. To explore the utility of this method, we examined differences in the mouse tracking metrics of those instructed to respond honestly or to fake. Our findings show that there is a distinguishable difference in the behavioral response of those who are faking when responding to pairs of personality descriptors presented in a forced-choice format compared to those who are responding honestly. Implications and contributions of this study include insights into the cognitive processing that can occur while responding to personality items when respondents are faking and a demonstration of how mouse tracking methods can be used to detect faking.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Public Administration and Development Social Sciences-Development

CiteScore

3.30

自引率

12.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： Since its founding in 1949, Public Administration and Development (PAD) has been reviewing and assessing the practice of public administration at the local, regional, national and international levels where it is directed to managing development processes in low and medium income countries. It gives special attention to investigations of the management of all phases of public policy formulation and implementation which have an interest and importance beyond a particular government and state. PAD has a particular interest in the link between public administration practice and management research and provides a professional and academic forum for reporting on new experiences and experiments. PAD also publishes articles on development management research in the NGO sector. It is widely read by academics and practitioners alike, including consultants, donors and policy advisers. With its case study approach, it is also frequently used for teaching and training purposes.