基于组合刚性配准优化的图像配准质量保证

Afua A. Yorke, Gary C. McDonald, D. Solis, T. Guerrero
{"title":"基于组合刚性配准优化的图像配准质量保证","authors":"Afua A. Yorke, Gary C. McDonald, D. Solis, T. Guerrero","doi":"10.31579/2640-1053/076","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: Expert selected landmark points on clinical image pairs to provide a basis for rigid registration validation. Using combinatorial rigid registration optimization (CORRO) provide a statistically characterized reference data set for image registration of the pelvis by estimating optimal registration. Materials ad Methods: Landmarks for each CT/CBCT image pair for 58 cases were identified. From the landmark pairs, combination subsets of k-number of landmark pairs were generated without repeat, forming k-set for k=4, 8, and 12. A rigid registration between the image pairs was computed for each k-combination set (2,000-8,000,000). The mean and standard deviation of the registration were used as final registration for each image pair. Joint entropy was used to validate the output results. Results: An average of 154 (range: 91-212) landmark pairs were selected for each CT/CBCT image pair. The mean standard deviation of the registration output decreased as the k-size increased for all cases. In general, the joint entropy evaluated was found to be lower than results from commercially available software. Of all 58 cases 58.3% of the k=4, 15% of k=8 and 18.3% of k=12 resulted in the better registration using CORRO as compared to 8.3% from a commercial registration software. The minimum joint entropy was determined for one case and found to exist at the estimated registration mean in agreement with the CORRO algorithm. Conclusion: The results demonstrate that CORRO works even in the extreme case of the pelvic anatomy where the CBCT suffers from reduced quality due to increased noise levels. The estimated optimal registration using CORRO was found to be better than commercially available software for all k-sets tested. Additionally, the k-set of 4 resulted in overall best outcomes when compared to k=8 and 12, which is anticipated because k=8 and 12 are more likely to have combinations that affected the accuracy of the registration.","PeriodicalId":93018,"journal":{"name":"Journal of cancer research and cellular therapeutics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Quality Assurance of Image Registration Using Combinatorial Rigid Registration Optimization (CORRO)\",\"authors\":\"Afua A. Yorke, Gary C. McDonald, D. Solis, T. Guerrero\",\"doi\":\"10.31579/2640-1053/076\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Purpose: Expert selected landmark points on clinical image pairs to provide a basis for rigid registration validation. Using combinatorial rigid registration optimization (CORRO) provide a statistically characterized reference data set for image registration of the pelvis by estimating optimal registration. Materials ad Methods: Landmarks for each CT/CBCT image pair for 58 cases were identified. From the landmark pairs, combination subsets of k-number of landmark pairs were generated without repeat, forming k-set for k=4, 8, and 12. A rigid registration between the image pairs was computed for each k-combination set (2,000-8,000,000). The mean and standard deviation of the registration were used as final registration for each image pair. Joint entropy was used to validate the output results. Results: An average of 154 (range: 91-212) landmark pairs were selected for each CT/CBCT image pair. The mean standard deviation of the registration output decreased as the k-size increased for all cases. In general, the joint entropy evaluated was found to be lower than results from commercially available software. Of all 58 cases 58.3% of the k=4, 15% of k=8 and 18.3% of k=12 resulted in the better registration using CORRO as compared to 8.3% from a commercial registration software. The minimum joint entropy was determined for one case and found to exist at the estimated registration mean in agreement with the CORRO algorithm. Conclusion: The results demonstrate that CORRO works even in the extreme case of the pelvic anatomy where the CBCT suffers from reduced quality due to increased noise levels. The estimated optimal registration using CORRO was found to be better than commercially available software for all k-sets tested. Additionally, the k-set of 4 resulted in overall best outcomes when compared to k=8 and 12, which is anticipated because k=8 and 12 are more likely to have combinations that affected the accuracy of the registration.\",\"PeriodicalId\":93018,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of cancer research and cellular therapeutics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-07-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of cancer research and cellular therapeutics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31579/2640-1053/076\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of cancer research and cellular therapeutics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31579/2640-1053/076","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

目的:专家选择临床图像对上的标志点,为刚性配准验证提供基础。使用组合刚性配准优化(CORRO)通过估计最优配准,为骨盆的图像配准提供了一个统计特征参考数据集。材料和方法:对58例患者的每对CT/CCT图像进行标记识别。根据地标对,生成k个地标对的组合子集而不重复,形成k=4、8和12的k集。为每个k组合集(2000-8000000)计算图像对之间的刚性配准。配准的平均值和标准偏差被用作每个图像对的最终配准。联合熵用于验证输出结果。结果:每个CT/CCT图像对平均选择154个(范围:91-212)标志对。在所有情况下,配准输出的平均标准偏差都随着k大小的增加而减小。一般来说,联合熵评估结果低于商用软件的结果。在所有58例病例中,58.3%的k=4、15%的k=8和18.3%的k=12使用CORRO进行了更好的注册,而商业注册软件的注册率为8.3%。针对一种情况确定了最小联合熵,并发现其存在于与CORRO算法一致的估计配准平均值处。结论:研究结果表明,CORRO即使在骨盆解剖的极端情况下也有效,因为噪音水平增加,CBCT的质量降低。对于所有测试的k集,使用CORRO估计的最优配准被发现比商用软件更好。此外,与k=8和12相比,4的k集产生了总体上最好的结果,这是预期的,因为k=8与12更有可能具有影响配准精度的组合。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Quality Assurance of Image Registration Using Combinatorial Rigid Registration Optimization (CORRO)
Purpose: Expert selected landmark points on clinical image pairs to provide a basis for rigid registration validation. Using combinatorial rigid registration optimization (CORRO) provide a statistically characterized reference data set for image registration of the pelvis by estimating optimal registration. Materials ad Methods: Landmarks for each CT/CBCT image pair for 58 cases were identified. From the landmark pairs, combination subsets of k-number of landmark pairs were generated without repeat, forming k-set for k=4, 8, and 12. A rigid registration between the image pairs was computed for each k-combination set (2,000-8,000,000). The mean and standard deviation of the registration were used as final registration for each image pair. Joint entropy was used to validate the output results. Results: An average of 154 (range: 91-212) landmark pairs were selected for each CT/CBCT image pair. The mean standard deviation of the registration output decreased as the k-size increased for all cases. In general, the joint entropy evaluated was found to be lower than results from commercially available software. Of all 58 cases 58.3% of the k=4, 15% of k=8 and 18.3% of k=12 resulted in the better registration using CORRO as compared to 8.3% from a commercial registration software. The minimum joint entropy was determined for one case and found to exist at the estimated registration mean in agreement with the CORRO algorithm. Conclusion: The results demonstrate that CORRO works even in the extreme case of the pelvic anatomy where the CBCT suffers from reduced quality due to increased noise levels. The estimated optimal registration using CORRO was found to be better than commercially available software for all k-sets tested. Additionally, the k-set of 4 resulted in overall best outcomes when compared to k=8 and 12, which is anticipated because k=8 and 12 are more likely to have combinations that affected the accuracy of the registration.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信