在洪泛区恢复过程中,天然洪水是河滩植被发展的加速因素吗?

IF 0.9 3区 生物学 Q3 MARINE & FRESHWATER BIOLOGY
Barbara Stammel, Julia Stäps, André Schwab, Kathrin Kiehl
{"title":"在洪泛区恢复过程中,天然洪水是河滩植被发展的加速因素吗?","authors":"Barbara Stammel,&nbsp;Julia Stäps,&nbsp;André Schwab,&nbsp;Kathrin Kiehl","doi":"10.1002/iroh.202102091","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Riverbanks are very dynamic habitats for riparian vegetation strongly influenced by fluvial and geomorphic processes. This habitat type was severely reduced in the past by river straightening and bank stabilisation. Restoration and establishment of new floodplain streams promote this habitat, but a directed succession to later stages was observed many times. Our study aimed to analyse whether the often observed directed succession of the streambank vegetation after restoration implementation could be reversed by a natural flood along a newly created floodplain stream. We investigated the effects of a natural flood in 2013 and different prerestoration conditions on species development in the riparian zone. Vegetation was studied along 12 transects in four different sections from 2011 to 2014. Species composition differed strongly between the sections. Species richness was lowest in a newly dug steep section with high morphological dynamics and highest on wider flat streambanks. Changes during the years reflecting different hydrological events varied between sections. The high natural flood in 2013 reduced the cover of the herb layer and increased bare ground, which led in most sections to a loss of nontarget species. Total target species richness did not change due to the natural flood, while target species showed a high turnover rate. In the following year, however, the flood-induced development of species composition, in general, was reversed. Natural floods changed abiotic and biotic conditions along the streambank, but they did not accelerate ecological restoration towards predefined target ecosystems. However, they were necessary to preserve the needed dynamic vegetation changes and species turnover to hinder the succession to later stages dominated by a few species. Our study shows that riparian vegetation near the streambank can be monitored most effectively in cross-profile transects, both in the long-term and event-related.</p>","PeriodicalId":54928,"journal":{"name":"International Review of Hydrobiology","volume":"107 1-2","pages":"76-87"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/iroh.202102091","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Are natural floods accelerators for streambank vegetation development in floodplain restoration?\",\"authors\":\"Barbara Stammel,&nbsp;Julia Stäps,&nbsp;André Schwab,&nbsp;Kathrin Kiehl\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/iroh.202102091\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Riverbanks are very dynamic habitats for riparian vegetation strongly influenced by fluvial and geomorphic processes. This habitat type was severely reduced in the past by river straightening and bank stabilisation. Restoration and establishment of new floodplain streams promote this habitat, but a directed succession to later stages was observed many times. Our study aimed to analyse whether the often observed directed succession of the streambank vegetation after restoration implementation could be reversed by a natural flood along a newly created floodplain stream. We investigated the effects of a natural flood in 2013 and different prerestoration conditions on species development in the riparian zone. Vegetation was studied along 12 transects in four different sections from 2011 to 2014. Species composition differed strongly between the sections. Species richness was lowest in a newly dug steep section with high morphological dynamics and highest on wider flat streambanks. Changes during the years reflecting different hydrological events varied between sections. The high natural flood in 2013 reduced the cover of the herb layer and increased bare ground, which led in most sections to a loss of nontarget species. Total target species richness did not change due to the natural flood, while target species showed a high turnover rate. In the following year, however, the flood-induced development of species composition, in general, was reversed. Natural floods changed abiotic and biotic conditions along the streambank, but they did not accelerate ecological restoration towards predefined target ecosystems. However, they were necessary to preserve the needed dynamic vegetation changes and species turnover to hinder the succession to later stages dominated by a few species. Our study shows that riparian vegetation near the streambank can be monitored most effectively in cross-profile transects, both in the long-term and event-related.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54928,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Review of Hydrobiology\",\"volume\":\"107 1-2\",\"pages\":\"76-87\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-12-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/iroh.202102091\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Review of Hydrobiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/iroh.202102091\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MARINE & FRESHWATER BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Review of Hydrobiology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/iroh.202102091","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MARINE & FRESHWATER BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

河岸是河岸植被的动态栖息地,受河流和地貌过程的强烈影响。这种生境类型在过去由于河流矫直和河岸稳定而严重减少。恢复和建立新的洪泛区溪流促进了这种栖息地,但多次观察到直接演替到后期阶段。我们的研究旨在分析在恢复实施后经常观察到的河岸植被的定向演替是否会被沿着新形成的洪泛平原河流的自然洪水逆转。研究了2013年一次自然洪水和不同恢复条件对河岸带物种发育的影响。2011 - 2014年对4个不同断面12个样带的植被进行了研究。不同剖面间物种组成差异较大。物种丰富度在新开挖的高形态动态陡峭断面中最低,在较宽的平坦河岸上最高。反映不同水文事件的年份变化在各段之间有所不同。2013年的高自然洪水减少了草本层的覆盖,增加了裸地,导致大部分区段的非目标物种丧失。总目标物种丰富度未因自然洪水而发生变化,但目标物种具有较高的周转率。然而,在接下来的一年里,洪水引起的物种组成的发展总体上是相反的。自然洪水改变了河流沿岸的生物和非生物条件,但并没有加速生态系统向预定目标生态系统的恢复。然而,为了保持植被的动态变化和物种的更替,以阻止演替到少数物种主导的后期阶段,它们是必要的。我们的研究表明,无论是长期的还是与事件相关的,在横断面样带中都可以最有效地监测河滩附近的河岸植被。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Are natural floods accelerators for streambank vegetation development in floodplain restoration?

Are natural floods accelerators for streambank vegetation development in floodplain restoration?

Riverbanks are very dynamic habitats for riparian vegetation strongly influenced by fluvial and geomorphic processes. This habitat type was severely reduced in the past by river straightening and bank stabilisation. Restoration and establishment of new floodplain streams promote this habitat, but a directed succession to later stages was observed many times. Our study aimed to analyse whether the often observed directed succession of the streambank vegetation after restoration implementation could be reversed by a natural flood along a newly created floodplain stream. We investigated the effects of a natural flood in 2013 and different prerestoration conditions on species development in the riparian zone. Vegetation was studied along 12 transects in four different sections from 2011 to 2014. Species composition differed strongly between the sections. Species richness was lowest in a newly dug steep section with high morphological dynamics and highest on wider flat streambanks. Changes during the years reflecting different hydrological events varied between sections. The high natural flood in 2013 reduced the cover of the herb layer and increased bare ground, which led in most sections to a loss of nontarget species. Total target species richness did not change due to the natural flood, while target species showed a high turnover rate. In the following year, however, the flood-induced development of species composition, in general, was reversed. Natural floods changed abiotic and biotic conditions along the streambank, but they did not accelerate ecological restoration towards predefined target ecosystems. However, they were necessary to preserve the needed dynamic vegetation changes and species turnover to hinder the succession to later stages dominated by a few species. Our study shows that riparian vegetation near the streambank can be monitored most effectively in cross-profile transects, both in the long-term and event-related.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Review of Hydrobiology
International Review of Hydrobiology 生物-海洋与淡水生物学
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
10.50%
发文量
15
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: As human populations grow across the planet, water security, biodiversity loss and the loss of aquatic ecosystem services take on ever increasing priority for policy makers. International Review of Hydrobiology brings together in one forum fundamental and problem-oriented research on the challenges facing marine and freshwater biology in an economically changing world. Interdisciplinary in nature, articles cover all aspects of aquatic ecosystems, ranging from headwater streams to the ocean and biodiversity studies to ecosystem functioning, modeling approaches including GIS and resource management, with special emphasis on the link between marine and freshwater environments. The editors expressly welcome research on baseline data. The knowledge-driven papers will interest researchers, while the problem-driven articles will be of particular interest to policy makers. The overarching aim of the journal is to translate science into policy, allowing us to understand global systems yet act on a regional scale. International Review of Hydrobiology publishes original articles, reviews, short communications, and methods papers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信