冒着擦除风险？后人文主义研究实践与儿童形象

IF 1.3 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH

Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood Pub Date : 2022-08-24 DOI:10.1177/14639491221117761

K. Murris, J. Osgood

{"title":"冒着擦除风险？后人文主义研究实践与儿童形象","authors":"K. Murris, J. Osgood","doi":"10.1177/14639491221117761","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"shared motivation for this special issue in response to the apparent explosion in posthumanist childhood studies in recent years; the deep scepticism and distrust it generates in certain and, crucially, our concern with detectable formulas that have in enact the complex dilute its philosophical underpinnings. special to slow down and pause, to re-turn to philosophical potential of posthumanism to transform the questions and open-ended enquiries","PeriodicalId":46773,"journal":{"name":"Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Risking erasure? Posthumanist research practices and figurations of (the) child\",\"authors\":\"K. Murris, J. Osgood\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/14639491221117761\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"shared motivation for this special issue in response to the apparent explosion in posthumanist childhood studies in recent years; the deep scepticism and distrust it generates in certain and, crucially, our concern with detectable formulas that have in enact the complex dilute its philosophical underpinnings. special to slow down and pause, to re-turn to philosophical potential of posthumanism to transform the questions and open-ended enquiries\",\"PeriodicalId\":46773,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-08-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/14639491221117761\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/14639491221117761","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 2

摘要

近年来，后人文主义儿童研究出现了明显的爆炸式增长，共同的动机促成了本期特刊的出版;它在某些，而且至关重要的是，我们对制定复杂的可检测公式的关注中产生了深刻的怀疑和不信任，削弱了它的哲学基础。特别要慢下来，暂停一下，回到后人文主义的哲学潜力来改变问题和开放式的询问

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Risking erasure? Posthumanist research practices and figurations of (the) child

shared motivation for this special issue in response to the apparent explosion in posthumanist childhood studies in recent years; the deep scepticism and distrust it generates in certain and, crucially, our concern with detectable formulas that have in enact the complex dilute its philosophical underpinnings. special to slow down and pause, to re-turn to philosophical potential of posthumanism to transform the questions and open-ended enquiries

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-

CiteScore

2.70

自引率

8.30%

发文量

期刊介绍： Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood (CIEC) is a peer-reviewed international research journal. The journal provides a forum for researchers and professionals who are exploring new and alternative perspectives in their work with young children (from birth to eight years of age) and their families. CIEC aims to present opportunities for scholars to highlight the ways in which the boundaries of early childhood studies and practice are expanding, and for readers to participate in the discussion of emerging issues, contradictions and possibilities.