1918年11月:德国革命

IF 0.3 4区 历史学 Q2 HISTORY
M. Hughes
{"title":"1918年11月:德国革命","authors":"M. Hughes","doi":"10.1080/00182370.2023.2231290","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"population” and the Holocaust was a footnote continues to challenge a “humanist understanding of Germany” (471), recalling Kant as well as Fichte. Smith might exaggerate the degree to which contemporary scholarship views Germany as a radically nationalist polity. His treatment of the period 1871 to 1945 is rather more traditional thematically than the rest of the book. Finally, the relative lack of attention to the Habsburg Empire and Austria, not to mention the GDR, could be construed as lacunae in a narrative aimed at reconceptualizing traditional understandings of German nationalism and nationhood. These modest caveats aside, Smith has produced a remarkably erudite, original, and beautifully written narrative history of nationalism and nationhood in German-speaking Central Europe.","PeriodicalId":44078,"journal":{"name":"HISTORIAN","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"November 1918: the German revolution\",\"authors\":\"M. Hughes\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/00182370.2023.2231290\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"population” and the Holocaust was a footnote continues to challenge a “humanist understanding of Germany” (471), recalling Kant as well as Fichte. Smith might exaggerate the degree to which contemporary scholarship views Germany as a radically nationalist polity. His treatment of the period 1871 to 1945 is rather more traditional thematically than the rest of the book. Finally, the relative lack of attention to the Habsburg Empire and Austria, not to mention the GDR, could be construed as lacunae in a narrative aimed at reconceptualizing traditional understandings of German nationalism and nationhood. These modest caveats aside, Smith has produced a remarkably erudite, original, and beautifully written narrative history of nationalism and nationhood in German-speaking Central Europe.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44078,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"HISTORIAN\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-04-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"HISTORIAN\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/00182370.2023.2231290\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"历史学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HISTORY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"HISTORIAN","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00182370.2023.2231290","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

人口”和大屠杀是一个脚注,继续挑战“对德国的人文主义理解”(471),让人想起康德和费希特。史密斯可能夸大了当代学术界将德国视为一个激进的民族主义政体的程度。他对1871年至1945年这段时期的处理在主题上比本书其他部分更为传统。最后,对哈布斯堡帝国和奥地利相对缺乏关注,更不用说民主德国了,这可以被解释为旨在重新概念化对德国民族主义和国家地位的传统理解的叙事中的空白。撇开这些适度的警告不谈,史密斯创作了一部关于德语中欧民族主义和国家地位的非常博学、原创和优美的叙事史。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
November 1918: the German revolution
population” and the Holocaust was a footnote continues to challenge a “humanist understanding of Germany” (471), recalling Kant as well as Fichte. Smith might exaggerate the degree to which contemporary scholarship views Germany as a radically nationalist polity. His treatment of the period 1871 to 1945 is rather more traditional thematically than the rest of the book. Finally, the relative lack of attention to the Habsburg Empire and Austria, not to mention the GDR, could be construed as lacunae in a narrative aimed at reconceptualizing traditional understandings of German nationalism and nationhood. These modest caveats aside, Smith has produced a remarkably erudite, original, and beautifully written narrative history of nationalism and nationhood in German-speaking Central Europe.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
HISTORIAN
HISTORIAN HISTORY-
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
3
期刊介绍: Founded in 1938, The Historian has one of the largest circulations of any scholarly journal in the US or Britain with over 13,000 paid subscribers, both individual and institutional. The Historian seeks to publish only the finest of contemporary and relevant historical scholarship. It is the commitment of The Historian to serve as an integrator for the historical profession, bringing together the many strands of historical analysis through the publication of a diverse collection of articles.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信