从自在到惰性

IF 0.3 0 PHILOSOPHY
Kimberly S. Engels
{"title":"从自在到惰性","authors":"Kimberly S. Engels","doi":"10.3167/SSI.2018.240105","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article focuses on Sartre’s concept of the practicoinert\nin his major work A Critique of Dialectical Reason, Vol. 1\n(CDR). I first show the progression from Sartre’s previous conception\nof in-itself to his concept of practico-inert. I identify five different\nlayers of the practico-inert: human-made objects, language,\nideas, social objects and class being. I show how these practico-inert\nlayers form the possibilities for our subjectivity and how this represents\na change from Sartre’s view of in-itself in Being and Nothingness.\nI then explore the relationship of freedom to the practico-inert\nand how Sartre argues that the practico-inert places limits on our\nfreedom. Lastly, I argue that despite the pessimistic picture Sartre\npaints in CDR, the practico-inert has the potential to both limit and\nenhance our freedom. I appeal to Sartre’s post-CDR essay ‘A Plea\nfor Intellectuals’ to argue that a Sartrean account of progress\nrequires the utilisation of the practico-inert.","PeriodicalId":41680,"journal":{"name":"Sartre Studies International","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3167/SSI.2018.240105","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"From In-Itself to Practico-Inert\",\"authors\":\"Kimberly S. Engels\",\"doi\":\"10.3167/SSI.2018.240105\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article focuses on Sartre’s concept of the practicoinert\\nin his major work A Critique of Dialectical Reason, Vol. 1\\n(CDR). I first show the progression from Sartre’s previous conception\\nof in-itself to his concept of practico-inert. I identify five different\\nlayers of the practico-inert: human-made objects, language,\\nideas, social objects and class being. I show how these practico-inert\\nlayers form the possibilities for our subjectivity and how this represents\\na change from Sartre’s view of in-itself in Being and Nothingness.\\nI then explore the relationship of freedom to the practico-inert\\nand how Sartre argues that the practico-inert places limits on our\\nfreedom. Lastly, I argue that despite the pessimistic picture Sartre\\npaints in CDR, the practico-inert has the potential to both limit and\\nenhance our freedom. I appeal to Sartre’s post-CDR essay ‘A Plea\\nfor Intellectuals’ to argue that a Sartrean account of progress\\nrequires the utilisation of the practico-inert.\",\"PeriodicalId\":41680,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sartre Studies International\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3167/SSI.2018.240105\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sartre Studies International\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3167/SSI.2018.240105\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"PHILOSOPHY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sartre Studies International","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3167/SSI.2018.240105","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PHILOSOPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

本文主要论述萨特在其主要著作《辩证理性批判》第一卷(CDR)中的实践观。我首先展示了从萨特之前对自身的概念到他对实践惰性的概念的发展。我确定了实践惰性的五个不同层面:人造物体、语言、思想、社会物体和阶级存在。我展示了这些实践惰性层是如何形成我们主体性的可能性的,以及这如何代表萨特在《存在与虚无》中对自身的看法的改变。然后,我探讨了自由与实践惰性的关系,以及萨特如何认为实践惰性限制了我们的自由。最后,我认为,尽管萨特在CDR中描绘了悲观的画面,但惰性的实践有可能限制和加强我们的自由。我引用萨特在CDR后的文章《知识分子的辩护》,认为萨特对进步的描述需要利用惰性的实践。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
From In-Itself to Practico-Inert
This article focuses on Sartre’s concept of the practicoinert in his major work A Critique of Dialectical Reason, Vol. 1 (CDR). I first show the progression from Sartre’s previous conception of in-itself to his concept of practico-inert. I identify five different layers of the practico-inert: human-made objects, language, ideas, social objects and class being. I show how these practico-inert layers form the possibilities for our subjectivity and how this represents a change from Sartre’s view of in-itself in Being and Nothingness. I then explore the relationship of freedom to the practico-inert and how Sartre argues that the practico-inert places limits on our freedom. Lastly, I argue that despite the pessimistic picture Sartre paints in CDR, the practico-inert has the potential to both limit and enhance our freedom. I appeal to Sartre’s post-CDR essay ‘A Plea for Intellectuals’ to argue that a Sartrean account of progress requires the utilisation of the practico-inert.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信