俄国电影的设计:无声时代电影的制作艺术家与物质环境

IF 0.1 0 FILM, RADIO, TELEVISION
Marshall Deutelbaum
{"title":"俄国电影的设计:无声时代电影的制作艺术家与物质环境","authors":"Marshall Deutelbaum","doi":"10.1080/17503132.2023.2204039","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Drawing on archival research and the established literature, Designing Russian Cinema charts the shifting attitudes of critics and set designers, termed here ‘production artists’, toward what constitutes proper set design during the silent era. Initially, this meant painterly inspired and ethnographically correct sets for films about rural life that were thought to reflect the Russian character. By the mid-1910s, these influences waned as set design came to be recognised as an independent art form. In films about urban life, complex spatial compositions became commonplace during this time, and individual designers established long-term working relationships with specific directors. Following the Revolution, set designers sought to envision the ideals and realities of the Soviet way of life in a variety of ways. Andrei Burov’s sets for Sergei Eisenstein’s The General Line (1926), for example, present a utopian ideal, while Sergei Kozlovskii’s almost barren interior sets for The Girl with a Hatbox (1927) capture the everyday reality of contemporary living space. Eventually, the set design in such films as Your Acquaintance (1927) and Golden Mountains (1931) start to reflect the psychology of characters. Rees focuses a thematically defined chapter – ‘The Rural Environment’, ‘The Domestic Interior’, ‘The Workplace’ – on each stage in this evolution of set design. An additional chapter, ‘Artistic Arenas’, traces instances of self-referential set designs depicting artistic practice and performance across the entire silent period. An appendix of eight essays by such set designers as Kozlovskii, Burov, Lev Kuleshov and Sergei Iutkevich, along with others, offers readers a direct view of what some key designers themselves thought the function of set design should be. The overall result is a rich, coherent survey of the progress of Russian cinema viewed from the previously under-developed vantage point of those responsible for what the films looked like. Focusing on the work of set designers enables Rees to trace out lines of influence among them. This allows her, for example, to reassess the contemporary praise for the sets that Vasilii Rakhal’s designed for Strike (1925).","PeriodicalId":41168,"journal":{"name":"Studies in Russian and Soviet Cinema","volume":"17 1","pages":"137 - 138"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Designing Russian cinema: The production artist and the material environment in silent era film\",\"authors\":\"Marshall Deutelbaum\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/17503132.2023.2204039\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Drawing on archival research and the established literature, Designing Russian Cinema charts the shifting attitudes of critics and set designers, termed here ‘production artists’, toward what constitutes proper set design during the silent era. Initially, this meant painterly inspired and ethnographically correct sets for films about rural life that were thought to reflect the Russian character. By the mid-1910s, these influences waned as set design came to be recognised as an independent art form. In films about urban life, complex spatial compositions became commonplace during this time, and individual designers established long-term working relationships with specific directors. Following the Revolution, set designers sought to envision the ideals and realities of the Soviet way of life in a variety of ways. Andrei Burov’s sets for Sergei Eisenstein’s The General Line (1926), for example, present a utopian ideal, while Sergei Kozlovskii’s almost barren interior sets for The Girl with a Hatbox (1927) capture the everyday reality of contemporary living space. Eventually, the set design in such films as Your Acquaintance (1927) and Golden Mountains (1931) start to reflect the psychology of characters. Rees focuses a thematically defined chapter – ‘The Rural Environment’, ‘The Domestic Interior’, ‘The Workplace’ – on each stage in this evolution of set design. An additional chapter, ‘Artistic Arenas’, traces instances of self-referential set designs depicting artistic practice and performance across the entire silent period. An appendix of eight essays by such set designers as Kozlovskii, Burov, Lev Kuleshov and Sergei Iutkevich, along with others, offers readers a direct view of what some key designers themselves thought the function of set design should be. The overall result is a rich, coherent survey of the progress of Russian cinema viewed from the previously under-developed vantage point of those responsible for what the films looked like. Focusing on the work of set designers enables Rees to trace out lines of influence among them. This allows her, for example, to reassess the contemporary praise for the sets that Vasilii Rakhal’s designed for Strike (1925).\",\"PeriodicalId\":41168,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Studies in Russian and Soviet Cinema\",\"volume\":\"17 1\",\"pages\":\"137 - 138\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Studies in Russian and Soviet Cinema\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/17503132.2023.2204039\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"FILM, RADIO, TELEVISION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studies in Russian and Soviet Cinema","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17503132.2023.2204039","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"FILM, RADIO, TELEVISION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

根据档案研究和已建立的文献,《设计俄罗斯电影》描绘了评论家和布景设计师(这里称为“制作艺术家”)对无声时代适当布景设计的转变态度。最初,这意味着在绘画灵感和民族志上正确的背景下,关于农村生活的电影被认为反映了俄罗斯人的性格。到20世纪10年代中期,随着布景设计被认为是一种独立的艺术形式,这些影响逐渐减弱。在关于城市生活的电影中,复杂的空间构成在这一时期变得司空见惯,个别设计师与特定的导演建立了长期的工作关系。革命之后,布景设计师试图以各种方式设想苏维埃生活方式的理想和现实。例如,安德烈·布罗夫为谢尔盖·爱森斯坦的《总线》(1926)设计的布景呈现出一种乌托邦式的理想,而谢尔盖·科兹洛夫斯基为《拿帽盒的女孩》(1927)设计的几乎荒凉的室内布景则捕捉到了当代生活空间的日常现实。最终,《你的熟人》(1927)和《金山》(1931)等电影的布景设计开始反映人物的心理。Rees将主题定义的章节——“乡村环境”、“家庭室内”、“工作场所”——集中在布景设计演变的每个阶段。另一章,“艺术舞台”,追溯了自我参照的场景设计的实例,描绘了整个沉默时期的艺术实践和表演。本书的附录收录了Kozlovskii、brov、Lev Kuleshov和Sergei Iutkevich等布景设计师的八篇文章,让读者可以直接了解一些关键设计师自己认为布景设计的功能应该是什么。整体的结果是一个丰富的,连贯的调查俄罗斯电影的进步,从以前欠发达的有利位置,负责什么电影看起来像。专注于布景设计师的工作使里斯能够追踪他们之间的影响线。例如,这使她能够重新评估当代对瓦西里·拉哈尔(Vasilii Rakhal)为《Strike》(1925)设计的布景的赞誉。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Designing Russian cinema: The production artist and the material environment in silent era film
Drawing on archival research and the established literature, Designing Russian Cinema charts the shifting attitudes of critics and set designers, termed here ‘production artists’, toward what constitutes proper set design during the silent era. Initially, this meant painterly inspired and ethnographically correct sets for films about rural life that were thought to reflect the Russian character. By the mid-1910s, these influences waned as set design came to be recognised as an independent art form. In films about urban life, complex spatial compositions became commonplace during this time, and individual designers established long-term working relationships with specific directors. Following the Revolution, set designers sought to envision the ideals and realities of the Soviet way of life in a variety of ways. Andrei Burov’s sets for Sergei Eisenstein’s The General Line (1926), for example, present a utopian ideal, while Sergei Kozlovskii’s almost barren interior sets for The Girl with a Hatbox (1927) capture the everyday reality of contemporary living space. Eventually, the set design in such films as Your Acquaintance (1927) and Golden Mountains (1931) start to reflect the psychology of characters. Rees focuses a thematically defined chapter – ‘The Rural Environment’, ‘The Domestic Interior’, ‘The Workplace’ – on each stage in this evolution of set design. An additional chapter, ‘Artistic Arenas’, traces instances of self-referential set designs depicting artistic practice and performance across the entire silent period. An appendix of eight essays by such set designers as Kozlovskii, Burov, Lev Kuleshov and Sergei Iutkevich, along with others, offers readers a direct view of what some key designers themselves thought the function of set design should be. The overall result is a rich, coherent survey of the progress of Russian cinema viewed from the previously under-developed vantage point of those responsible for what the films looked like. Focusing on the work of set designers enables Rees to trace out lines of influence among them. This allows her, for example, to reassess the contemporary praise for the sets that Vasilii Rakhal’s designed for Strike (1925).
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Studies in Russian and Soviet Cinema
Studies in Russian and Soviet Cinema FILM, RADIO, TELEVISION-
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
22
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信