通过批判性和新唯物主义的见解重新构想教育中的数字技术

IF 1.2 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Magda Pischetola
{"title":"通过批判性和新唯物主义的见解重新构想教育中的数字技术","authors":"Magda Pischetola","doi":"10.1344/der.2021.40.154-171","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Technological determinism, techno-solutionism and instrumental perspectives on technologies have populated educational research literature in the last decades, and even more since the pandemic crisis has started. This essay offers a critique about simplistic explanations of technology adoption in pedagogy by using insights from critical philosophy of technology and feminist new materialism. It rejects the assumption of teachers’ resistance to change and proposes a frame to expand future imaginaries of education. In this sense, critical studies provide a focus on human activity as interconnected with social and situated knowledges/practices. The emphasis is on recursive relations that allow educational researchers and practitioners to take into account the considerable complexity of digital technologies pedagogical adoption. On the other hand, feminist new materialism brings about a new focus on relational ontology, which adds to the critical theoretical framework the agentic element. By overcoming a binary way of seeing technologies through utopias and dystopias, new materialist studies focus on ethics and responsibility. We argue that we need both a critical and a neo-materialist view, in order to adopt technologies in education in meaningful, productive and creative ways. Building on small narratives and possible utopias can take us to re-design and re-interprete the future of educational technologies.","PeriodicalId":44576,"journal":{"name":"Digital Education Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Re-imagining Digital Technology in Education through Critical and Neo-materialist Insights\",\"authors\":\"Magda Pischetola\",\"doi\":\"10.1344/der.2021.40.154-171\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Technological determinism, techno-solutionism and instrumental perspectives on technologies have populated educational research literature in the last decades, and even more since the pandemic crisis has started. This essay offers a critique about simplistic explanations of technology adoption in pedagogy by using insights from critical philosophy of technology and feminist new materialism. It rejects the assumption of teachers’ resistance to change and proposes a frame to expand future imaginaries of education. In this sense, critical studies provide a focus on human activity as interconnected with social and situated knowledges/practices. The emphasis is on recursive relations that allow educational researchers and practitioners to take into account the considerable complexity of digital technologies pedagogical adoption. On the other hand, feminist new materialism brings about a new focus on relational ontology, which adds to the critical theoretical framework the agentic element. By overcoming a binary way of seeing technologies through utopias and dystopias, new materialist studies focus on ethics and responsibility. We argue that we need both a critical and a neo-materialist view, in order to adopt technologies in education in meaningful, productive and creative ways. Building on small narratives and possible utopias can take us to re-design and re-interprete the future of educational technologies.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44576,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Digital Education Review\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-12-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Digital Education Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1344/der.2021.40.154-171\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Digital Education Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1344/der.2021.40.154-171","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

在过去的几十年里,技术决定论、技术解决方案主义和对技术的工具观点充斥着教育研究文献,自大流行危机开始以来,这种观点甚至更多。本文运用批判技术哲学和女权主义新唯物主义的见解,对教育学中对技术采用的简单化解释进行了批判。它拒绝了教师抗拒变革的假设,并提出了一个扩展未来教育想象的框架。从这个意义上说,批判性研究提供了人类活动与社会和情境知识/实践相互联系的关注。重点是递归关系,使教育研究人员和实践者能够考虑到数字技术教学采用的相当复杂性。另一方面,女性主义新唯物主义带来了对关系本体论的新关注,为批判的理论框架增添了代理元素。通过克服通过乌托邦和反乌托邦看待技术的二元方式,新唯物主义研究关注伦理和责任。我们认为,为了以有意义、富有成效和创造性的方式在教育中采用技术,我们既需要批判的观点,也需要新唯物主义的观点。以小故事和可能的乌托邦为基础,我们可以重新设计和重新解释教育技术的未来。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Re-imagining Digital Technology in Education through Critical and Neo-materialist Insights
Technological determinism, techno-solutionism and instrumental perspectives on technologies have populated educational research literature in the last decades, and even more since the pandemic crisis has started. This essay offers a critique about simplistic explanations of technology adoption in pedagogy by using insights from critical philosophy of technology and feminist new materialism. It rejects the assumption of teachers’ resistance to change and proposes a frame to expand future imaginaries of education. In this sense, critical studies provide a focus on human activity as interconnected with social and situated knowledges/practices. The emphasis is on recursive relations that allow educational researchers and practitioners to take into account the considerable complexity of digital technologies pedagogical adoption. On the other hand, feminist new materialism brings about a new focus on relational ontology, which adds to the critical theoretical framework the agentic element. By overcoming a binary way of seeing technologies through utopias and dystopias, new materialist studies focus on ethics and responsibility. We argue that we need both a critical and a neo-materialist view, in order to adopt technologies in education in meaningful, productive and creative ways. Building on small narratives and possible utopias can take us to re-design and re-interprete the future of educational technologies.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Digital Education Review
Digital Education Review EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
14.30%
发文量
18
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: Digital Education Review (DER) is a scientific, open and peer review journal designed as a space for dialogue and reflection about the impact of ICT on education and new emergent forms of teaching and learning in digital environments. It is published half-yearly (June & December) and it includes articles in English or Spanish. ICT plays an important role in education, raising discussions and important new challenges. Analyze the impact of ICT, new forms of literacy and virtual teaching and learning are the main goals of Digital Education Review. The publication is open to all those investigators who wish to propose articles on this subject. Articles admitted include empirical investigations as well as reviews and theoretical reflections. The journal publishes different kinds of articles: Peer Review Articles: articles that have passed the blind review carried out by a group of experts Reviews: short articles about books, software or websides and PhD Guest and Invited Articles: articles approved by the Editorial Board of the journal. DER publishes issues related with its focus and scope and also monographic issues, centered on a specific subject. Both of them are subjected to a peer review process. Finally, this journal is published by the Digital Education Observatory (OED) and Virtual Teaching and Learning Research Group (GREAV) at the Universitat de Barcelona.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信