I. Bărbulescu, C. Dumitrache, C. Diguță, M. Begea, P. M. Matei, M. Frîncu, Simona Ioana Mărculescu, Alexandru Ciric, V. Tudor, Elena Mirela Boroiu, R. Teodorescu
{"title":"在微发酵水平上酿酒酵母菌和芽孢星菌的生长动态演变,在皮特罗萨酒庄具有潜在的酿酒用途","authors":"I. Bărbulescu, C. Dumitrache, C. Diguță, M. Begea, P. M. Matei, M. Frîncu, Simona Ioana Mărculescu, Alexandru Ciric, V. Tudor, Elena Mirela Boroiu, R. Teodorescu","doi":"10.17930/agl202221","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The grape surface hosts a complex community of yeast Saccharomyces and non-Saccharomyces species responsible for spontaneous alcoholic fermentation in wine industry. The yeast strains used for this study were isolated from ‘Tămâioasă Românească’ and ‘Busuioacă de Bohotin’ grape varieties from Pietroasa vineyard, and the isolates were identified through a molecular method. Identification of yeast strains through the BLASTn analysis of the 5.8S-ITS region revealed that PFE5 strain showed the best sequence match to Saccharomyces cerevisiae (98% similarity) and PFE15 strain to Starmerella bacillaris (99.78% similarity), respectively. In this first micro-pilot study, the differences between Sacharomyces and non-Saccharomyces yeasts in batch (for Starmella bacillaris) and fed-batch fermentation system (for S. cerevisae) and how these regimes influence the culture growth were assessed. The applied fed-batch process was capable for producing two times more S. cerevisae yeast biomass than Starmella bacillaris through a batch process. In addition, the yield of S. cerevisiae converting the substrate into biomass was 42.3%, almost double compared to the yield of Starmella bacillaris. Moreover, the cell wet weight (WCW) for S. cerevisae was 32.5 g/L and for Starmella bacillaris 15.35 g/L, respectively. Both yeast biomass will be used at Pietroasa winery for inoculation separately or mixed as co-culture for ‘Tămâioasă Românească’ and ‘Busuioacă de Bohotin’ grape juice.","PeriodicalId":44979,"journal":{"name":"AgroLife Scientific Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"EVOLUTION AT THE MICROFERMENTER LEVEL OF THE GROWTH DYNAMICS OF Saccharomyces cerevisiae AND Starmella bacillaris YEASTS WITH POTENTIAL FOR USE IN WINEMAKING AT THE PIETROASA WINERY\",\"authors\":\"I. Bărbulescu, C. Dumitrache, C. Diguță, M. Begea, P. M. Matei, M. Frîncu, Simona Ioana Mărculescu, Alexandru Ciric, V. Tudor, Elena Mirela Boroiu, R. Teodorescu\",\"doi\":\"10.17930/agl202221\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The grape surface hosts a complex community of yeast Saccharomyces and non-Saccharomyces species responsible for spontaneous alcoholic fermentation in wine industry. The yeast strains used for this study were isolated from ‘Tămâioasă Românească’ and ‘Busuioacă de Bohotin’ grape varieties from Pietroasa vineyard, and the isolates were identified through a molecular method. Identification of yeast strains through the BLASTn analysis of the 5.8S-ITS region revealed that PFE5 strain showed the best sequence match to Saccharomyces cerevisiae (98% similarity) and PFE15 strain to Starmerella bacillaris (99.78% similarity), respectively. In this first micro-pilot study, the differences between Sacharomyces and non-Saccharomyces yeasts in batch (for Starmella bacillaris) and fed-batch fermentation system (for S. cerevisae) and how these regimes influence the culture growth were assessed. The applied fed-batch process was capable for producing two times more S. cerevisae yeast biomass than Starmella bacillaris through a batch process. In addition, the yield of S. cerevisiae converting the substrate into biomass was 42.3%, almost double compared to the yield of Starmella bacillaris. Moreover, the cell wet weight (WCW) for S. cerevisae was 32.5 g/L and for Starmella bacillaris 15.35 g/L, respectively. Both yeast biomass will be used at Pietroasa winery for inoculation separately or mixed as co-culture for ‘Tămâioasă Românească’ and ‘Busuioacă de Bohotin’ grape juice.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44979,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"AgroLife Scientific Journal\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"AgroLife Scientific Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17930/agl202221\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRONOMY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AgroLife Scientific Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17930/agl202221","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
摘要
葡萄表面有一个复杂的酵母菌群落,酵母菌和非酵母菌负责葡萄酒工业中自发的酒精发酵。本研究所使用的酵母菌是从Pietroasa葡萄园的‘t mioasei rom neascei’和‘busuioacei de Bohotin’葡萄品种中分离得到的,并通过分子方法对其进行了鉴定。通过5.8S-ITS区的BLASTn分析对酵母菌进行鉴定,结果显示PFE5菌株与酿酒酵母(Saccharomyces cerevisiae)和PFE15菌株的序列匹配度分别为98%和99.78%。在这第一个微型中试研究中,我们评估了酵母和非酵母在分批发酵系统(用于杆菌Starmella bacillaris)和补料分批发酵系统(用于酿酒酵母S. cerevisae)中的差异,以及这些制度如何影响培养物的生长。采用间歇补料法生产的酿酒酵母生物量是间歇法生产的芽孢星菌的两倍。此外,酿酒酵母将底物转化为生物量的产量为42.3%,几乎是杆菌Starmella bacillaris的两倍。酿酒酵母的细胞湿重(WCW)为32.5 g/L,芽孢杆菌的细胞湿重为15.35 g/L。这两种酵母生物量将在Pietroasa酿酒厂单独接种或混合培养' t mioasei rom neascei '和' busuioacei de Bohotin '葡萄汁。
EVOLUTION AT THE MICROFERMENTER LEVEL OF THE GROWTH DYNAMICS OF Saccharomyces cerevisiae AND Starmella bacillaris YEASTS WITH POTENTIAL FOR USE IN WINEMAKING AT THE PIETROASA WINERY
The grape surface hosts a complex community of yeast Saccharomyces and non-Saccharomyces species responsible for spontaneous alcoholic fermentation in wine industry. The yeast strains used for this study were isolated from ‘Tămâioasă Românească’ and ‘Busuioacă de Bohotin’ grape varieties from Pietroasa vineyard, and the isolates were identified through a molecular method. Identification of yeast strains through the BLASTn analysis of the 5.8S-ITS region revealed that PFE5 strain showed the best sequence match to Saccharomyces cerevisiae (98% similarity) and PFE15 strain to Starmerella bacillaris (99.78% similarity), respectively. In this first micro-pilot study, the differences between Sacharomyces and non-Saccharomyces yeasts in batch (for Starmella bacillaris) and fed-batch fermentation system (for S. cerevisae) and how these regimes influence the culture growth were assessed. The applied fed-batch process was capable for producing two times more S. cerevisae yeast biomass than Starmella bacillaris through a batch process. In addition, the yield of S. cerevisiae converting the substrate into biomass was 42.3%, almost double compared to the yield of Starmella bacillaris. Moreover, the cell wet weight (WCW) for S. cerevisae was 32.5 g/L and for Starmella bacillaris 15.35 g/L, respectively. Both yeast biomass will be used at Pietroasa winery for inoculation separately or mixed as co-culture for ‘Tămâioasă Românească’ and ‘Busuioacă de Bohotin’ grape juice.