沟通技能培训对限制生命疾病患者共同决策记录的影响:一项在重症监护室的观察性研究

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Sharyn L. Milnes RN, GCCCN, GCHE, GDipEd, MBioeth , Debra C. Kerr BN MBusL GCResM, GCTerEd PhD , Ana Hutchinson BN, GDClinEpi, GC-ALL, PhD , Nicholas B. Simpson MBBS, FACEM, FCICM, DIMC RCSEd, GCHE, PGDipEcho , Yianni Mantzaridis BMBS , Charlie Corke MBBS, FCICM , Michael Bailey PhD, MSc (statistics), BSc (hons), GAICD , Neil R. Orford MBBS, FANZCA, FCICM, PGDip Echo, PhD
{"title":"沟通技能培训对限制生命疾病患者共同决策记录的影响:一项在重症监护室的观察性研究","authors":"Sharyn L. Milnes RN, GCCCN, GCHE, GDipEd, MBioeth ,&nbsp;Debra C. Kerr BN MBusL GCResM, GCTerEd PhD ,&nbsp;Ana Hutchinson BN, GDClinEpi, GC-ALL, PhD ,&nbsp;Nicholas B. Simpson MBBS, FACEM, FCICM, DIMC RCSEd, GCHE, PGDipEcho ,&nbsp;Yianni Mantzaridis BMBS ,&nbsp;Charlie Corke MBBS, FCICM ,&nbsp;Michael Bailey PhD, MSc (statistics), BSc (hons), GAICD ,&nbsp;Neil R. Orford MBBS, FANZCA, FCICM, PGDip Echo, PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.ccrj.2023.04.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>This article aims to examine the association between a shared decision-making (SDM) clinical communication training program and documentation of SDM for patients with life-limiting illness (LLI) admitted to intensive care.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This article used a prospective, longitudinal observational study in a tertiary intensive care unit (ICU). Outcomes included the proportion of patients with SDM documented on an institutional Goals of Care Form during hospital admission, as well as characteristics, outcomes, and factors associated with an SDM admission.</p></div><div><h3>Intervention</h3><p>Clinical communication skills training (iValidate) and clinical support program are the intervention for this study.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 325 patients with LLI were admitted to the ICU and included in the study. Overall, 184 (57%) had an SDM admission, with 79% of Goals of Care Form completed by an iValidate-trained doctor. Exposure to an iValidate-trained doctor was the strongest predictor of an ICU patient with LLI having an SDM admission (odds ratio: 22.72, 95% confidence interval: 11.91–43.54, <em>p</em> &lt; 0.0001). A higher proportion of patients with an SDM admission selected high-dependency unit–level care (29% vs. 12%, <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001) and ward-based care (36% vs. 5%, p &lt; 0.0001), with no difference in the proportion of patients choosing intensive care or palliative care. The proportion of patients with no deterioration plan was higher in the non-SDM admission cohort (59% vs. 0%, <em>p</em> &lt; 0.0001).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Clinical communication training that explicitly teaches identification of patient values is associated with improved documentation of SDM for critically ill patients with LLI. Understanding the relationship between improved SDM and patient, family, and clinical outcomes requires appropriately designed high-quality trials randomised at the patient or cluster level.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":49215,"journal":{"name":"Critical Care and Resuscitation","volume":"25 1","pages":"Pages 20-26"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of communication skills training on documentation of shared decision-making for patients with life-limiting illness: An observational study in an intensive care unit\",\"authors\":\"Sharyn L. Milnes RN, GCCCN, GCHE, GDipEd, MBioeth ,&nbsp;Debra C. Kerr BN MBusL GCResM, GCTerEd PhD ,&nbsp;Ana Hutchinson BN, GDClinEpi, GC-ALL, PhD ,&nbsp;Nicholas B. Simpson MBBS, FACEM, FCICM, DIMC RCSEd, GCHE, PGDipEcho ,&nbsp;Yianni Mantzaridis BMBS ,&nbsp;Charlie Corke MBBS, FCICM ,&nbsp;Michael Bailey PhD, MSc (statistics), BSc (hons), GAICD ,&nbsp;Neil R. Orford MBBS, FANZCA, FCICM, PGDip Echo, PhD\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ccrj.2023.04.005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>This article aims to examine the association between a shared decision-making (SDM) clinical communication training program and documentation of SDM for patients with life-limiting illness (LLI) admitted to intensive care.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This article used a prospective, longitudinal observational study in a tertiary intensive care unit (ICU). Outcomes included the proportion of patients with SDM documented on an institutional Goals of Care Form during hospital admission, as well as characteristics, outcomes, and factors associated with an SDM admission.</p></div><div><h3>Intervention</h3><p>Clinical communication skills training (iValidate) and clinical support program are the intervention for this study.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 325 patients with LLI were admitted to the ICU and included in the study. Overall, 184 (57%) had an SDM admission, with 79% of Goals of Care Form completed by an iValidate-trained doctor. Exposure to an iValidate-trained doctor was the strongest predictor of an ICU patient with LLI having an SDM admission (odds ratio: 22.72, 95% confidence interval: 11.91–43.54, <em>p</em> &lt; 0.0001). A higher proportion of patients with an SDM admission selected high-dependency unit–level care (29% vs. 12%, <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001) and ward-based care (36% vs. 5%, p &lt; 0.0001), with no difference in the proportion of patients choosing intensive care or palliative care. The proportion of patients with no deterioration plan was higher in the non-SDM admission cohort (59% vs. 0%, <em>p</em> &lt; 0.0001).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Clinical communication training that explicitly teaches identification of patient values is associated with improved documentation of SDM for critically ill patients with LLI. Understanding the relationship between improved SDM and patient, family, and clinical outcomes requires appropriately designed high-quality trials randomised at the patient or cluster level.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49215,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Critical Care and Resuscitation\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"Pages 20-26\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Critical Care and Resuscitation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1441277223000054\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical Care and Resuscitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1441277223000054","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的本文旨在探讨共同决策(SDM)临床沟通培训计划与重症监护患者SDM记录之间的关系。方法采用前瞻性、纵向观察性研究,在某三级重症监护病房(ICU)进行。结果包括住院期间记录在机构护理目标表上的SDM患者的比例,以及与SDM入院相关的特征、结果和因素。干预措施临床沟通技巧训练(iValidate)和临床支持计划是本研究的干预措施。结果共有325例LLI患者入住ICU并纳入研究。总体而言,184人(57%)接受SDM入院,其中79%的护理目标表由ivalidate培训的医生完成。接触ivalidate培训过的医生是ICU LLI患者SDM入院的最强预测因子(优势比:22.72,95%可信区间:11.91-43.54,p <0.0001)。SDM入院患者选择高依赖单位级别护理的比例较高(29% vs. 12%, p <0.001)和病房护理(36% vs. 5%, p <0.0001),选择重症监护或姑息治疗的患者比例无差异。在非sdm入院队列中,无恶化计划的患者比例更高(59%比0%,p <0.0001)。结论明确教授患者价值识别的临床沟通培训与改善LLI危重患者SDM记录有关。了解改善的SDM与患者、家庭和临床结果之间的关系,需要在患者或集群水平上随机设计适当的高质量试验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effect of communication skills training on documentation of shared decision-making for patients with life-limiting illness: An observational study in an intensive care unit

Objectives

This article aims to examine the association between a shared decision-making (SDM) clinical communication training program and documentation of SDM for patients with life-limiting illness (LLI) admitted to intensive care.

Methods

This article used a prospective, longitudinal observational study in a tertiary intensive care unit (ICU). Outcomes included the proportion of patients with SDM documented on an institutional Goals of Care Form during hospital admission, as well as characteristics, outcomes, and factors associated with an SDM admission.

Intervention

Clinical communication skills training (iValidate) and clinical support program are the intervention for this study.

Results

A total of 325 patients with LLI were admitted to the ICU and included in the study. Overall, 184 (57%) had an SDM admission, with 79% of Goals of Care Form completed by an iValidate-trained doctor. Exposure to an iValidate-trained doctor was the strongest predictor of an ICU patient with LLI having an SDM admission (odds ratio: 22.72, 95% confidence interval: 11.91–43.54, p < 0.0001). A higher proportion of patients with an SDM admission selected high-dependency unit–level care (29% vs. 12%, p < 0.001) and ward-based care (36% vs. 5%, p < 0.0001), with no difference in the proportion of patients choosing intensive care or palliative care. The proportion of patients with no deterioration plan was higher in the non-SDM admission cohort (59% vs. 0%, p < 0.0001).

Conclusions

Clinical communication training that explicitly teaches identification of patient values is associated with improved documentation of SDM for critically ill patients with LLI. Understanding the relationship between improved SDM and patient, family, and clinical outcomes requires appropriately designed high-quality trials randomised at the patient or cluster level.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Critical Care and Resuscitation
Critical Care and Resuscitation CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE-
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
3.40%
发文量
44
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: ritical Care and Resuscitation (CC&R) is the official scientific journal of the College of Intensive Care Medicine (CICM). The Journal is a quarterly publication (ISSN 1441-2772) with original articles of scientific and clinical interest in the specialities of Critical Care, Intensive Care, Anaesthesia, Emergency Medicine and related disciplines. The Journal is received by all Fellows and trainees, along with an increasing number of subscribers from around the world. The CC&R Journal currently has an impact factor of 3.3, placing it in 8th position in world critical care journals and in first position in the world outside the USA and Europe.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信