自我调节学习和跨文化能力:考察自我调节在支持职前教师跨文化学习成果中的作用

IF 1 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Marissa M. Zhu, Kimberly M. Alberts, W. Bork, David Wong
{"title":"自我调节学习和跨文化能力:考察自我调节在支持职前教师跨文化学习成果中的作用","authors":"Marissa M. Zhu, Kimberly M. Alberts, W. Bork, David Wong","doi":"10.1080/14675986.2023.2213655","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This mixed-methods study examines how 15 preservice teachers’ self-regulated learning (SRL) skills relate to their ICC development in a teacher education course. ICC was assessed using a standardised exam and an open-ended cultural dilemma. Participants’ SRL was assessed along 7 dimensions: planning, goal orientation, task strategies, self-efficacy, self-monitoring, self-evaluation, and adaptiveness. Quantitative analyses demonstrate that participants’ SRL abilities were significantly associated with higher ICC outcomes on the exam (r = .69, p < .01) and dilemma assignment (r = .87, p < .01). Higher performance on the exam was associated with the planning, self-monitoring, and self-evaluation processes, whereas higher performance on the cultural dilemma was associated with planning, goal orientation, strategy use, self-monitoring, self-evaluation, and adaptiveness. To compare ICC development across participants at varying levels of SRL abilities, we conducted a content analysis of participants’ dilemma responses. Only participants with the highest self-regulation skills demonstrated proficiency in all four cognitive intercultural competencies. Participants who were less adept at self-regulation were more likely to make ethnocentric statements in their responses, suggesting minimal evidence of ICC development. Overall, the findings supported our hypothesis that more skilled self-regulators would be further developed along the cognitive dimension of ICC.","PeriodicalId":46788,"journal":{"name":"Intercultural Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Self-regulated learning and intercultural competence: examining the role of self-regulation in supporting preservice teachers’ intercultural learning outcomes\",\"authors\":\"Marissa M. Zhu, Kimberly M. Alberts, W. Bork, David Wong\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/14675986.2023.2213655\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT This mixed-methods study examines how 15 preservice teachers’ self-regulated learning (SRL) skills relate to their ICC development in a teacher education course. ICC was assessed using a standardised exam and an open-ended cultural dilemma. Participants’ SRL was assessed along 7 dimensions: planning, goal orientation, task strategies, self-efficacy, self-monitoring, self-evaluation, and adaptiveness. Quantitative analyses demonstrate that participants’ SRL abilities were significantly associated with higher ICC outcomes on the exam (r = .69, p < .01) and dilemma assignment (r = .87, p < .01). Higher performance on the exam was associated with the planning, self-monitoring, and self-evaluation processes, whereas higher performance on the cultural dilemma was associated with planning, goal orientation, strategy use, self-monitoring, self-evaluation, and adaptiveness. To compare ICC development across participants at varying levels of SRL abilities, we conducted a content analysis of participants’ dilemma responses. Only participants with the highest self-regulation skills demonstrated proficiency in all four cognitive intercultural competencies. Participants who were less adept at self-regulation were more likely to make ethnocentric statements in their responses, suggesting minimal evidence of ICC development. Overall, the findings supported our hypothesis that more skilled self-regulators would be further developed along the cognitive dimension of ICC.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46788,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Intercultural Education\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Intercultural Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/14675986.2023.2213655\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Intercultural Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14675986.2023.2213655","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要:这项混合方法研究考察了15名职前教师的自我调节学习(SRL)技能与他们在教师教育课程中的ICC发展之间的关系。ICC采用标准化考试和开放式文化困境进行评估。参与者的SRL从7个维度进行评估:计划、目标定向、任务策略、自我效能感、自我监控、自我评价和适应能力。定量分析表明,参与者的SRL能力与考试中较高的ICC成绩显著相关(r = .69,p < .01)和困境分配(r = .87,p < .01)。更高的考试成绩与计划、自我监控和自我评估过程有关,而更高的文化困境表现与计划、目标导向、策略使用、自我监控、自我评估和适应能力有关。为了比较不同SRL能力水平参与者的ICC发展,我们对参与者的困境反应进行了内容分析。只有具有最高自我调节技能的参与者才能熟练掌握所有四种认知跨文化能力。不太善于自我调节的参与者更有可能在回答中发表以种族为中心的言论,这表明ICC发展的证据很少。总的来说,这些发现支持了我们的假设,即更熟练的自我调节器将沿着ICC的认知维度进一步发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Self-regulated learning and intercultural competence: examining the role of self-regulation in supporting preservice teachers’ intercultural learning outcomes
ABSTRACT This mixed-methods study examines how 15 preservice teachers’ self-regulated learning (SRL) skills relate to their ICC development in a teacher education course. ICC was assessed using a standardised exam and an open-ended cultural dilemma. Participants’ SRL was assessed along 7 dimensions: planning, goal orientation, task strategies, self-efficacy, self-monitoring, self-evaluation, and adaptiveness. Quantitative analyses demonstrate that participants’ SRL abilities were significantly associated with higher ICC outcomes on the exam (r = .69, p < .01) and dilemma assignment (r = .87, p < .01). Higher performance on the exam was associated with the planning, self-monitoring, and self-evaluation processes, whereas higher performance on the cultural dilemma was associated with planning, goal orientation, strategy use, self-monitoring, self-evaluation, and adaptiveness. To compare ICC development across participants at varying levels of SRL abilities, we conducted a content analysis of participants’ dilemma responses. Only participants with the highest self-regulation skills demonstrated proficiency in all four cognitive intercultural competencies. Participants who were less adept at self-regulation were more likely to make ethnocentric statements in their responses, suggesting minimal evidence of ICC development. Overall, the findings supported our hypothesis that more skilled self-regulators would be further developed along the cognitive dimension of ICC.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Intercultural Education
Intercultural Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
8.30%
发文量
36
期刊介绍: Intercultural Education is a global forum for the analysis of issues dealing with education in plural societies. It provides educational professionals with the knowledge and information that can assist them in contributing to the critical analysis and the implementation of intercultural education. Topics covered include: terminological issues, education and multicultural society today, intercultural communication, human rights and anti-racist education, pluralism and diversity in a democratic frame work, pluralism in post-communist and in post-colonial countries, migration and indigenous minority issues, refugee issues, language policy issues, curriculum and classroom organisation, and school development.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信