木瓜凝胶处理后牙本质表面的三维粗糙度和形态

Q4 Dentistry
P. M. Pires, Paula Martins Bravo Miranda, Paula Helena de Accioly Costa, A. Monteiro, A. Alexandria, Lucianne Cople Maia, A. A. Neves
{"title":"木瓜凝胶处理后牙本质表面的三维粗糙度和形态","authors":"P. M. Pires, Paula Martins Bravo Miranda, Paula Helena de Accioly Costa, A. Monteiro, A. Alexandria, Lucianne Cople Maia, A. A. Neves","doi":"10.5195/d3000.2022.176","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: To investigate the effect of chemomechanical caries removing agents (CCRAs) based on papain (Papacárie Duo Gel® and Brix3000®) over dentin surfaces compared with 37% phosphoric acid and 11.5% polyacrylic acid.Materials and methods: Sound human molars were sectioned at the crown level, resulting in 48 dentin blocks, which were randomly divided into 4 groups (n=12): 1) Papacárie Duo Gel®; 2) Brix3000®; 3) 11.5% polyacrylic acid solution and 4) 37% phosphoric acid gel. All products were applied for 30s. Ten blocks per group were analyzed by a non-contact 3D profilometer before and after treatments for linear (Ra) and volumetric roughness (Sa). The superficial morphology of the remaining blocks in each group (n=2) was evaluated by scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Normality was rejected for the data (Shapiro-Wilk test) and therefore, Kruskal-Wallis test, followed by Dunn’s proof or Wilcoxon signed rank test with its respective effect size calculation were used to compare the results with α=5%.Results: Ra and Sa values for specimens submitted to Papacárie Duo Gel® and Brix3000® were statistically similar to baseline values. Application of phosphoric and polyacrylic acid resulted in a statistically increase in roughness compared to the CCRAs. SEM evaluation showed that Papacárie Duo Gel® resulted in surface debris. Polyacrylic acid and Brix3000®resulted in partial opening of the tubules but dentin exposed to polyacrylic was able to remove more smear layer than Brix3000®, while phosphoric acid resulted in total opening of the dentinal tubules.Conclusion: Both Papacárie Duo Gel® and Brix3000® did not result in roughness changes when applied in sound dentin.","PeriodicalId":37056,"journal":{"name":"Dentistry 3000","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Tridimensional roughness and morphology of sound dentin surfaces after papain-gel treatment\",\"authors\":\"P. M. Pires, Paula Martins Bravo Miranda, Paula Helena de Accioly Costa, A. Monteiro, A. Alexandria, Lucianne Cople Maia, A. A. Neves\",\"doi\":\"10.5195/d3000.2022.176\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Purpose: To investigate the effect of chemomechanical caries removing agents (CCRAs) based on papain (Papacárie Duo Gel® and Brix3000®) over dentin surfaces compared with 37% phosphoric acid and 11.5% polyacrylic acid.Materials and methods: Sound human molars were sectioned at the crown level, resulting in 48 dentin blocks, which were randomly divided into 4 groups (n=12): 1) Papacárie Duo Gel®; 2) Brix3000®; 3) 11.5% polyacrylic acid solution and 4) 37% phosphoric acid gel. All products were applied for 30s. Ten blocks per group were analyzed by a non-contact 3D profilometer before and after treatments for linear (Ra) and volumetric roughness (Sa). The superficial morphology of the remaining blocks in each group (n=2) was evaluated by scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Normality was rejected for the data (Shapiro-Wilk test) and therefore, Kruskal-Wallis test, followed by Dunn’s proof or Wilcoxon signed rank test with its respective effect size calculation were used to compare the results with α=5%.Results: Ra and Sa values for specimens submitted to Papacárie Duo Gel® and Brix3000® were statistically similar to baseline values. Application of phosphoric and polyacrylic acid resulted in a statistically increase in roughness compared to the CCRAs. SEM evaluation showed that Papacárie Duo Gel® resulted in surface debris. Polyacrylic acid and Brix3000®resulted in partial opening of the tubules but dentin exposed to polyacrylic was able to remove more smear layer than Brix3000®, while phosphoric acid resulted in total opening of the dentinal tubules.Conclusion: Both Papacárie Duo Gel® and Brix3000® did not result in roughness changes when applied in sound dentin.\",\"PeriodicalId\":37056,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Dentistry 3000\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-03-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Dentistry 3000\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5195/d3000.2022.176\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Dentistry\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dentistry 3000","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5195/d3000.2022.176","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:与37%磷酸和11.5%聚丙烯酸相比,研究基于木瓜蛋白酶(Papacárie Duo-Gel®和Brix3000®)的化学机械除龋剂(CCRA)对牙本质表面的影响。材料和方法:在牙冠水平切开健全的人磨牙,得到48个牙本质块,随机分为4组(n=12):1)Papacárie Duo-Gel®;2) Brix3000®;3) 11.5%聚丙烯酸溶液和4)37%磷酸凝胶。所有产品应用时间均为30s。在线性(Ra)和体积粗糙度(Sa)处理前后,每组10个块通过非接触式3D轮廓仪进行分析。通过扫描电子显微镜(SEM)评估各组(n=2)中剩余嵌段的表面形态。数据的正态性被拒绝(Shapiro-Wilk检验),因此,使用Kruskal-Wallis检验、Dunn证明或Wilcoxon符号秩检验及其各自的效应大小计算来比较α=5%的结果。结果:提交给Papacárie Duo-Gel®和Brix3000®的样本的Ra和Sa值在统计学上与基线值相似。与CCRA相比,磷酸和聚丙烯酸的应用导致粗糙度的统计增加。SEM评估显示Papacárie Duo-Gel®导致表面碎屑。聚丙烯酸和Brix3000®导致牙本质小管部分开放,但暴露于聚丙烯酸的牙本质比Brix3000®能够去除更多的涂抹层,而磷酸导致牙本质管完全开放。结论:Papacárie Duo Gel®和Brix3000®应用于健全的牙本质时,不会导致粗糙度变化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Tridimensional roughness and morphology of sound dentin surfaces after papain-gel treatment
Purpose: To investigate the effect of chemomechanical caries removing agents (CCRAs) based on papain (Papacárie Duo Gel® and Brix3000®) over dentin surfaces compared with 37% phosphoric acid and 11.5% polyacrylic acid.Materials and methods: Sound human molars were sectioned at the crown level, resulting in 48 dentin blocks, which were randomly divided into 4 groups (n=12): 1) Papacárie Duo Gel®; 2) Brix3000®; 3) 11.5% polyacrylic acid solution and 4) 37% phosphoric acid gel. All products were applied for 30s. Ten blocks per group were analyzed by a non-contact 3D profilometer before and after treatments for linear (Ra) and volumetric roughness (Sa). The superficial morphology of the remaining blocks in each group (n=2) was evaluated by scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Normality was rejected for the data (Shapiro-Wilk test) and therefore, Kruskal-Wallis test, followed by Dunn’s proof or Wilcoxon signed rank test with its respective effect size calculation were used to compare the results with α=5%.Results: Ra and Sa values for specimens submitted to Papacárie Duo Gel® and Brix3000® were statistically similar to baseline values. Application of phosphoric and polyacrylic acid resulted in a statistically increase in roughness compared to the CCRAs. SEM evaluation showed that Papacárie Duo Gel® resulted in surface debris. Polyacrylic acid and Brix3000®resulted in partial opening of the tubules but dentin exposed to polyacrylic was able to remove more smear layer than Brix3000®, while phosphoric acid resulted in total opening of the dentinal tubules.Conclusion: Both Papacárie Duo Gel® and Brix3000® did not result in roughness changes when applied in sound dentin.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Dentistry 3000
Dentistry 3000 Dentistry-Dentistry (all)
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
25
审稿时长
19 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信