比较传统与可生物降解贻贝种子收集器(SMCs)对种子沉降、种子密度和种子生长的影响:部署深度和位置的影响

IF 3.6 2区 农林科学 Q2 AGRICULTURAL ENGINEERING
Lisanne A. van den Bogaart , Jildou Schotanus , Jacob J. Capelle , Tjeerd J. Bouma
{"title":"比较传统与可生物降解贻贝种子收集器(SMCs)对种子沉降、种子密度和种子生长的影响:部署深度和位置的影响","authors":"Lisanne A. van den Bogaart ,&nbsp;Jildou Schotanus ,&nbsp;Jacob J. Capelle ,&nbsp;Tjeerd J. Bouma","doi":"10.1016/j.aquaeng.2023.102344","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Mussel bottom culture is historically based on transplanting wild mussel seed to designated culture plots. Seed mussel collectors (SMCs) that are deployed in the water column are gradually replacing benthic mussel beds for mussel seed resource provisioning. Traditional SMCs consist of weighted filamentous nylon ropes. The performance of SMCs are promising, but the major disadvantages are the increased cost, effort, and the use of non-sustainable materials. In this study, we developed an innovative SMC: the BioShell-SMC. It consists of a coconut core rope surrounded by empty cockle shells that are held in place by biodegradable socking. The advantage of this system compared to traditional SMCs is that it provides biodegradable and sustainable resource material suitable for on-bottom placement. We compared its relative performance to that of a traditional SMC at different deployment depths and locations used for SMC deployment in the Dutch Wadden Sea and Oosterschelde. The results from this experiment indicated that in six out of nine locations mussel seed biomass was comparable between the two collector types. On both collector types, mussel seed biomass was higher in the Wadden Sea than in the Oosterschelde. We also found that mussel seed biomass development was not affected by deployment depth, though mussels were more numerous and shorter in deep water. The results of the current study provide a promising start toward a more sustainable mussel seed collection for bottom cultivation.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8120,"journal":{"name":"Aquacultural Engineering","volume":"102 ","pages":"Article 102344"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparing traditional vs. biodegradable seed mussel collectors (SMCs) for seed settlement, seed density, and seed growth: Effect of deployment depth and location\",\"authors\":\"Lisanne A. van den Bogaart ,&nbsp;Jildou Schotanus ,&nbsp;Jacob J. Capelle ,&nbsp;Tjeerd J. Bouma\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.aquaeng.2023.102344\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Mussel bottom culture is historically based on transplanting wild mussel seed to designated culture plots. Seed mussel collectors (SMCs) that are deployed in the water column are gradually replacing benthic mussel beds for mussel seed resource provisioning. Traditional SMCs consist of weighted filamentous nylon ropes. The performance of SMCs are promising, but the major disadvantages are the increased cost, effort, and the use of non-sustainable materials. In this study, we developed an innovative SMC: the BioShell-SMC. It consists of a coconut core rope surrounded by empty cockle shells that are held in place by biodegradable socking. The advantage of this system compared to traditional SMCs is that it provides biodegradable and sustainable resource material suitable for on-bottom placement. We compared its relative performance to that of a traditional SMC at different deployment depths and locations used for SMC deployment in the Dutch Wadden Sea and Oosterschelde. The results from this experiment indicated that in six out of nine locations mussel seed biomass was comparable between the two collector types. On both collector types, mussel seed biomass was higher in the Wadden Sea than in the Oosterschelde. We also found that mussel seed biomass development was not affected by deployment depth, though mussels were more numerous and shorter in deep water. The results of the current study provide a promising start toward a more sustainable mussel seed collection for bottom cultivation.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8120,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Aquacultural Engineering\",\"volume\":\"102 \",\"pages\":\"Article 102344\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Aquacultural Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0144860923000316\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRICULTURAL ENGINEERING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aquacultural Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0144860923000316","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AGRICULTURAL ENGINEERING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

贻贝底部培养在历史上是基于将野生贻贝种子移植到指定的培养区。部署在水柱中的贻贝种子收集器(SMC)正在逐渐取代海底贻贝床,以提供贻贝种子资源。传统的SMC由加重的丝状尼龙绳组成。SMC的性能是有希望的,但主要缺点是增加了成本、工作量和使用不可持续的材料。在这项研究中,我们开发了一种创新的SMC:BioShell SMC。它由一根椰子芯绳组成,周围环绕着空的贝壳,贝壳通过可生物降解的鞋垫固定在适当的位置。与传统SMC相比,该系统的优点在于,它提供了适合底部放置的可生物降解和可持续的资源材料。我们将其相对性能与传统SMC在不同部署深度和位置的相对性能进行了比较,用于荷兰瓦德登海和奥斯特舍尔德的SMC部署。该实验的结果表明,在九个位置中的六个位置,两种收集器类型的贻贝种子生物量相当。在这两种收集器类型中,Wadden海的贻贝种子生物量都高于Oosterschelde。我们还发现,贻贝种子生物量的发展不受部署深度的影响,尽管贻贝在深水中数量更多、更短。目前的研究结果为更可持续的海底养殖贻贝种子采集提供了一个有希望的开端。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparing traditional vs. biodegradable seed mussel collectors (SMCs) for seed settlement, seed density, and seed growth: Effect of deployment depth and location

Mussel bottom culture is historically based on transplanting wild mussel seed to designated culture plots. Seed mussel collectors (SMCs) that are deployed in the water column are gradually replacing benthic mussel beds for mussel seed resource provisioning. Traditional SMCs consist of weighted filamentous nylon ropes. The performance of SMCs are promising, but the major disadvantages are the increased cost, effort, and the use of non-sustainable materials. In this study, we developed an innovative SMC: the BioShell-SMC. It consists of a coconut core rope surrounded by empty cockle shells that are held in place by biodegradable socking. The advantage of this system compared to traditional SMCs is that it provides biodegradable and sustainable resource material suitable for on-bottom placement. We compared its relative performance to that of a traditional SMC at different deployment depths and locations used for SMC deployment in the Dutch Wadden Sea and Oosterschelde. The results from this experiment indicated that in six out of nine locations mussel seed biomass was comparable between the two collector types. On both collector types, mussel seed biomass was higher in the Wadden Sea than in the Oosterschelde. We also found that mussel seed biomass development was not affected by deployment depth, though mussels were more numerous and shorter in deep water. The results of the current study provide a promising start toward a more sustainable mussel seed collection for bottom cultivation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Aquacultural Engineering
Aquacultural Engineering 农林科学-农业工程
CiteScore
8.60
自引率
10.00%
发文量
63
审稿时长
>24 weeks
期刊介绍: Aquacultural Engineering is concerned with the design and development of effective aquacultural systems for marine and freshwater facilities. The journal aims to apply the knowledge gained from basic research which potentially can be translated into commercial operations. Problems of scale-up and application of research data involve many parameters, both physical and biological, making it difficult to anticipate the interaction between the unit processes and the cultured animals. Aquacultural Engineering aims to develop this bioengineering interface for aquaculture and welcomes contributions in the following areas: – Engineering and design of aquaculture facilities – Engineering-based research studies – Construction experience and techniques – In-service experience, commissioning, operation – Materials selection and their uses – Quantification of biological data and constraints
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信