否认与武器控制差异的技术-种族动态

IF 0.6 Q3 POLITICAL SCIENCE
R. Mathur
{"title":"否认与武器控制差异的技术-种族动态","authors":"R. Mathur","doi":"10.1080/02185377.2018.1515640","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This paper argues that there is an urgent need for postcolonial scholars to engage with the problem of arms control and disarmament. It is also an invitation for experts on arms control and disarmament to gain insights from existing postcolonial perspectives on problems of violence. A violence that is resurfacing with the simultaneous emergence of the ‘dynamic of difference’ through civilizational posturing of West and the Rest and the ‘dynamic of denial’ that encourages erasure and reclusion of colonial violence, Hiroshima and the contribution of the Global South towards arms control and disarmament. This paper seeks to make visible how the ‘dynamic of difference’ and the ‘dynamic of denial’ work in tandem with each other in everyday practices of weapons control. It introduces the concept of ‘techno-racism’ to understand the circulating power of discourses on racial reductionism and technological determinism that are productive forces having an effect on the intersecting dynamics of difference and denial in weapons control. This is demonstrated with reference to the historical trajectory of representation and memory of Hiroshima in contemporary discourses on arms control and disarmament.","PeriodicalId":44333,"journal":{"name":"Asian Journal of Political Science","volume":"26 1","pages":"297 - 313"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2018-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/02185377.2018.1515640","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Techno-Racial dynamics of denial & difference in weapons control\",\"authors\":\"R. Mathur\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/02185377.2018.1515640\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT This paper argues that there is an urgent need for postcolonial scholars to engage with the problem of arms control and disarmament. It is also an invitation for experts on arms control and disarmament to gain insights from existing postcolonial perspectives on problems of violence. A violence that is resurfacing with the simultaneous emergence of the ‘dynamic of difference’ through civilizational posturing of West and the Rest and the ‘dynamic of denial’ that encourages erasure and reclusion of colonial violence, Hiroshima and the contribution of the Global South towards arms control and disarmament. This paper seeks to make visible how the ‘dynamic of difference’ and the ‘dynamic of denial’ work in tandem with each other in everyday practices of weapons control. It introduces the concept of ‘techno-racism’ to understand the circulating power of discourses on racial reductionism and technological determinism that are productive forces having an effect on the intersecting dynamics of difference and denial in weapons control. This is demonstrated with reference to the historical trajectory of representation and memory of Hiroshima in contemporary discourses on arms control and disarmament.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44333,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Asian Journal of Political Science\",\"volume\":\"26 1\",\"pages\":\"297 - 313\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-09-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/02185377.2018.1515640\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Asian Journal of Political Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/02185377.2018.1515640\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"POLITICAL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Journal of Political Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02185377.2018.1515640","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

摘要本文认为,后殖民学者迫切需要参与军备控制与裁军问题的研究。这也是邀请军备控制和裁军专家从现有的后殖民观点中获得对暴力问题的见解。与此同时,通过西方和其他地区的文明姿态出现的“差异动态”和鼓励消除和封闭殖民暴力、广岛以及全球南方对军备控制和裁军的贡献的“否认动态”正在重新出现。本文试图揭示“差异动态”和“拒绝动态”在武器控制的日常实践中是如何协同工作的。它引入了“技术种族主义”的概念,以理解关于种族还原论和技术决定论的话语的循环力量,这些话语是对武器控制中差异和否认的交叉动态产生影响的生产力。这一点在当代军备控制和裁军论述中对广岛的再现和记忆的历史轨迹中得到了证明。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Techno-Racial dynamics of denial & difference in weapons control
ABSTRACT This paper argues that there is an urgent need for postcolonial scholars to engage with the problem of arms control and disarmament. It is also an invitation for experts on arms control and disarmament to gain insights from existing postcolonial perspectives on problems of violence. A violence that is resurfacing with the simultaneous emergence of the ‘dynamic of difference’ through civilizational posturing of West and the Rest and the ‘dynamic of denial’ that encourages erasure and reclusion of colonial violence, Hiroshima and the contribution of the Global South towards arms control and disarmament. This paper seeks to make visible how the ‘dynamic of difference’ and the ‘dynamic of denial’ work in tandem with each other in everyday practices of weapons control. It introduces the concept of ‘techno-racism’ to understand the circulating power of discourses on racial reductionism and technological determinism that are productive forces having an effect on the intersecting dynamics of difference and denial in weapons control. This is demonstrated with reference to the historical trajectory of representation and memory of Hiroshima in contemporary discourses on arms control and disarmament.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
期刊介绍: Asian Journal of Political Science ( AJPS) is an international refereed journal affiliated to the Graduate School of Public Administration, Seoul National University. Published since 1993, AJPS is a leading journal on Asian politics and governance. It publishes high-quality original articles in major areas of political science, including comparative politics, political thought, international relations, public policy, and public administration, with specific reference to Asian regions and countries. AJPS aims to address some of the most contemporary political and administrative issues in Asia (especially in East, South, and Southeast Asia) at the local, national, and global levels. The journal can be of great value to academic experts, researchers, and students in the above areas of political science as well as to practical policy makers, state institutions, and international agencies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信